Fully automated 3D aortic segmentation of 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic analysis using deep learning.
4D flow MRI
MRI
hemodynamics
machine learning
thoracic aorta
Journal
Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
30
09
2019
revised:
18
02
2020
accepted:
24
02
2020
pubmed:
14
3
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
14
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To generate fully automated and fast 4D-flow MRI-based 3D segmentations of the aorta using deep learning for reproducible quantification of aortic flow, peak velocity, and dimensions. A total of 1018 subjects with aortic 4D-flow MRI (528 with bicuspid aortic valve, 376 with tricuspid aortic valve and aortic dilation, 114 healthy controls) comprised the data set. A convolutional neural network was trained to generate 3D aortic segmentations from 4D-flow data. Manual segmentations served as the ground truth (N = 499 training, N = 101 validation, N = 418 testing). Dice scores, Hausdorff distance, and average symmetrical surface distance were calculated to assess performance. Aortic flow, peak velocity, and lumen dimensions were quantified at the ascending, arch, and descending aorta and compared using Bland-Altman analysis. Interobserver variability of manual analysis was assessed on a subset of 40. Convolutional neural network segmentation required 0.438 ± 0.355 seconds versus 630 ± 254 seconds for manual analysis and demonstrated excellent performance with a median Dice score of 0.951 (0.930-0.966), Hausdorff distance of 2.80 (2.13-4.35), and average symmetrical surface distance of 0.176 (0.119-0.290). Excellent agreement was found for flow, peak velocity, and dimensions with low bias and limits of agreement less than 10% difference versus manual analysis. For aortic volume, limits of agreement were moderate within 16.3%. Interobserver variability (median Dice score: 0.950; Hausdorff distance: 2.45; and average symmetrical surface distance: 0.145) and convolutional neural network-based analysis (median Dice score: 0.953-0.959; Hausdorff distance: 2.24-2.91; and average symmetrical surface distance: 0.145-1.98 to observers) demonstrated similar reproducibility. Deep learning enabled fast and automated 3D aortic segmentation from 4D-flow MRI, demonstrating its potential for efficient clinical workflows. Future studies should investigate its utility for other vasculature and multivendor applications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32167203
doi: 10.1002/mrm.28257
pmc: PMC7724647
mid: NIHMS1651160
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2204-2218Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL115828
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL133504
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001422
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : F30 HL145995
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL134633
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jan;33(1):232-8
pubmed: 21182145
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):252-266
pubmed: 30732721
Med Image Anal. 2018 Oct;49:128-140
pubmed: 30144652
Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):160-169
pubmed: 30063195
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Nov;46(11):1097-112
pubmed: 19002516
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Jul;72(1):33-40
pubmed: 24006013
BMC Med Imaging. 2015 Aug 12;15:29
pubmed: 26263899
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Apr;49(4):1149-1156
pubmed: 30350434
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18 Suppl 1:1894-5
pubmed: 26237171
Radiology. 2018 Jul;288(1):177-185
pubmed: 29584598
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015 Feb;23(1):15-23
pubmed: 25476670
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Aug 10;17:72
pubmed: 26257141
Circulation. 2012 Sep 18;126(12):1452-60
pubmed: 22879371
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Oct 05;17:87
pubmed: 26438074
Heart. 2004 Aug;90(8):893-901
pubmed: 15253962
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Feb;63(2):330-8
pubmed: 20024953
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Mar;7(2):217-24
pubmed: 21779767
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Jan 7;21(1):1
pubmed: 30612574
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1):102-8
pubmed: 26466113
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Feb;39(2):300-8
pubmed: 9469714
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993 May-Jun;3(3):521-30
pubmed: 8324312
Ann Vasc Dis. 2010;3(3):196-201
pubmed: 23555410
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jan;43(1):236-48
pubmed: 26140480
Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):81-88
pubmed: 30299231
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Apr;31(4):881-8
pubmed: 20373432