Genetic correlations between energy status indicator traits and female fertility in primiparous Nordic Red Dairy cattle.

acetone beta-hydroxybutyrate fatty acid heritability mid-IR reflectance spectroscopy

Journal

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience
ISSN: 1751-732X
Titre abrégé: Animal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101303270

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 3 2020
pubmed: 14 3 2020
medline: 14 3 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Inclusion of feed efficiency traits into the dairy cattle breeding programmes will require considering early lactation energy status to avoid deterioration in health and fertility of dairy cows. In this regard, energy status indicator (ESI) traits, for example, blood metabolites or milk fatty acids (FAs), are of interest. These indicators can be predicted from routine milk samples by mid-IR reflectance spectroscopy (MIR). In this study, we estimated genetic variation in ESI traits and their genetic correlation with female fertility in early lactation. The data consisted of 37 424 primiparous Nordic Red Dairy cows with milk test-day records between 8 and 91 days in milk (DIM). Routine test-day milk samples were analysed by MIR using previously developed calibration equations for blood plasma non-esterified FA (NEFA), milk FAs, milk beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) and milk acetone concentrations. Six ESI traits were considered and included: plasma NEFA concentration (mmol/l) either predicted by multiple linear regression including DIM, milk fat to protein ratio (FPR) and FAs C10:0, C14:0, C18:1 cis-9, C14:0 * C18:1 cis-9 (NEFAFA) or directly from milk MIR spectra (NEFAMIR), C18:1 cis-9 (g/100 ml milk), FPR, BHB (mmol/l milk) and acetone (mmol/l milk). The interval from calving to first insemination (ICF) was considered as the fertility trait. Data were analysed using linear mixed models. Heritability estimates varied during the first three lactation months from 0.13 to 0.19, 0.10 to 0.17, 0.09 to 0.14, 0.07 to 0.10, 0.13 to 0.17 and 0.13 to 0.18 for NEFAMIR, NEFAFA, C18:1 cis-9, FPR, milk BHB and acetone, respectively. Genetic correlations between all ESI traits and ICF were from 0.18 to 0.40 in the first lactation period (8 to 35 DIM), in general somewhat lower (0.03 to 0.43) in the second period (36 to 63 DIM) and decreased clearly (-0.02 to 0.19) in the third period (64 to 91 DIM). Our results indicate that genetic variation in energy status of cows in early lactation can be determined using MIR-predicted indicators. In addition, the markedly lower genetic correlation between ESI traits and fertility in the third lactation month indicated that energy status should be determined from the first test-day milk samples during the first 2 months of lactation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32167447
pii: S1751731120000439
doi: 10.1017/S1751731120000439
pmc: PMC7369375
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Références

J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1267-1280
pubmed: 29174146
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Aug;94(8):4152-63
pubmed: 21787950
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016 Nov;29(11):1530-1540
pubmed: 27608643
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Apr;92(4):1469-78
pubmed: 19307628
Reprod Domest Anim. 2008 Oct;43(5):612-22
pubmed: 18384499
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Nov;95(11):6781-7
pubmed: 22939798
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Sep;102(9):7904-7916
pubmed: 31301831
Animal. 2019 Mar;13(3):649-658
pubmed: 29987991
Reproduction. 2005 Oct;130(4):485-95
pubmed: 16183866
Animal. 2015 Feb;9(2):191-207
pubmed: 25387784
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):7286-92
pubmed: 25218753
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6312-6326
pubmed: 28571989
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5393-5402
pubmed: 22916946
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):6113-21
pubmed: 22863102
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Apr;90(4):1761-6
pubmed: 17369216
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1171-86
pubmed: 24440251
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Apr;93(4):1702-12
pubmed: 20338448
Anim Reprod Sci. 2014 Jan 30;144(3-4):60-71
pubmed: 24378117
J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):4268-4278
pubmed: 29477533
Proc Nutr Soc. 2000 Feb;59(1):127-34
pubmed: 10828182
J Dairy Sci. 2016 May;99(5):4080-4094
pubmed: 26723123
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Apr;94(4):1657-67
pubmed: 21426953
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Sep;99(9):6855-6873
pubmed: 27372587
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Dec;95(12):7225-35
pubmed: 23040020
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Jul;91(7):2814-22
pubmed: 18565939
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Feb;96(2):1237-50
pubmed: 23260017
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Sep;102(9):8184-8196
pubmed: 31279556
Animal. 2019 May;13(5):897-908
pubmed: 30523776
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4323-32
pubmed: 18946138

Auteurs

T Mehtiö (T)

Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 2, FI-31600Jokioinen, Finland.

P Mäntysaari (P)

Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 2, FI-31600Jokioinen, Finland.

E Negussie (E)

Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 2, FI-31600Jokioinen, Finland.

A-M Leino (AM)

Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 2, FI-31600Jokioinen, Finland.

J Pösö (J)

Faba Co-op, PO Box 40, FI-01301Vantaa, Finland.

E A Mäntysaari (EA)

Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 2, FI-31600Jokioinen, Finland.

M H Lidauer (MH)

Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Tietotie 2, FI-31600Jokioinen, Finland.

Classifications MeSH