Are Rubber Gloves Marketed as Accelerator-Free Truly Free of Accelerators?


Journal

Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
ISSN: 2162-5220
Titre abrégé: Dermatitis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101207335

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 14 3 2020
pubmed: 14 3 2020
medline: 14 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Allergic contact dermatitis to rubber accelerators in gloves has been well described in the literature. In response to this, glove manufacturers have recently marketed "accelerator-free" gloves. Little research has been done, to confirm whether these gloves are truly free from the accelerators known to cause contact dermatitis. The aim of the study was to verify use of accelerators in reportedly accelerator-free/low-dermatitis-potential gloves. A total of 16 commercially available medical gloves touted as "accelerator-free," "sensitive," or "low dermatitis potential" were obtained and analyzed via mass spectrometry (liquid chromatography heated electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography heated electrospray high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry) to determine whether any of the 9 known rubber accelerators were present (thiurams, carbamates, mercaptobenzothiazole, and diphenylguanidine). Despite marketing claims to the contrary, all tested gloves had at least 1 accelerant detected. Dipentamethylenethiuram disulfide, a thiuram, was found in all 16 gloves. Half of the gloves (8/16) contained more than 1 accelerator, with 1 glove having 5 rubber accelerators present. Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to accelerators should be aware potentially sensitizing accelerators may be present in gloves that are reported to not contain them.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Allergic contact dermatitis to rubber accelerators in gloves has been well described in the literature. In response to this, glove manufacturers have recently marketed "accelerator-free" gloves. Little research has been done, to confirm whether these gloves are truly free from the accelerators known to cause contact dermatitis.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to verify use of accelerators in reportedly accelerator-free/low-dermatitis-potential gloves.
METHODS
A total of 16 commercially available medical gloves touted as "accelerator-free," "sensitive," or "low dermatitis potential" were obtained and analyzed via mass spectrometry (liquid chromatography heated electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography heated electrospray high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry) to determine whether any of the 9 known rubber accelerators were present (thiurams, carbamates, mercaptobenzothiazole, and diphenylguanidine).
RESULTS
Despite marketing claims to the contrary, all tested gloves had at least 1 accelerant detected. Dipentamethylenethiuram disulfide, a thiuram, was found in all 16 gloves. Half of the gloves (8/16) contained more than 1 accelerator, with 1 glove having 5 rubber accelerators present.
CONCLUSION
Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to accelerators should be aware potentially sensitizing accelerators may be present in gloves that are reported to not contain them.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32168144
doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000508
pii: 01206501-202003000-00007
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Retracted Publication

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

128-133

Commentaires et corrections

Type : RetractionIn

Auteurs

Makenzie E Pillsbury (ME)

From the Masonic Cancer Center Mass Spectrometry Facility.

Sanna Ronkainen (S)

Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University, DC.

Molly Goodier (M)

University of Minnesota Medical School.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota.

Sara A Hylwa (SA)

Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Park Nicollet Contact Dermatitis Clinic, Health Partners Institute.
Department of Dermatology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN.

Classifications MeSH