Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging reveals distinct early breast tumor hemodynamic responses to metronomic and maximum tolerated dose regimens.
Breast cancer
Diffuse optics
Flare
Metronomic
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Treatment monitoring
Journal
Breast cancer research : BCR
ISSN: 1465-542X
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100927353
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 03 2020
13 03 2020
Historique:
received:
13
09
2019
accepted:
11
02
2020
entrez:
15
3
2020
pubmed:
15
3
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breast cancer patients with early-stage disease are increasingly administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to downstage their tumors prior to surgery. In this setting, approximately 31% of patients fail to respond to therapy. This demonstrates the need for techniques capable of providing personalized feedback about treatment response at the earliest stages of therapy to identify patients likely to benefit from changing treatment. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) has emerged as a promising functional imaging technique for NAC monitoring. DOSI uses non-ionizing near-infrared light to provide non-invasive measures of absolute concentrations of tissue chromophores such as oxyhemoglobin. In 2011, we reported a new DOSI prognostic marker, oxyhemoglobin flare: a transient increase in oxyhemoglobin capable of discriminating NAC responders within the first day of treatment. In this follow-up study, DOSI was used to confirm the presence of the flare as well as to investigate whether DOSI markers of NAC response are regimen dependent. This dual-center study examined 54 breast tumors receiving NAC measured with DOSI before therapy and the first week following chemotherapy administration. Patients were treated with either a standard of care maximum tolerated dose (MTD) regimen or an investigational metronomic (MET) regimen. Changes in tumor chromophores were tracked throughout the first week and compared to pathologic response and treatment regimen at specific days utilizing generalized estimating equations (GEE). Within patients receiving MTD therapy, the oxyhemoglobin flare was confirmed as a prognostic DOSI marker for response appearing as soon as day 1 with post hoc GEE analysis demonstrating a difference of 48.77% between responders and non-responders (p < 0.0001). Flare was not observed in patients receiving MET therapy. Within all responding patients, the specific treatment was a significant predictor of day 1 changes in oxyhemoglobin, showing a difference of 39.45% (p = 0.0010) between patients receiving MTD and MET regimens. DOSI optical biomarkers are differentially sensitive to MTD and MET regimens at early timepoints suggesting the specific treatment regimen should be considered in future DOSI studies. Additionally, DOSI may help to identify regimen-specific responses in a more personalized manner, potentially providing critical feedback necessary to implement adaptive changes to the treatment strategy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer patients with early-stage disease are increasingly administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to downstage their tumors prior to surgery. In this setting, approximately 31% of patients fail to respond to therapy. This demonstrates the need for techniques capable of providing personalized feedback about treatment response at the earliest stages of therapy to identify patients likely to benefit from changing treatment. Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) has emerged as a promising functional imaging technique for NAC monitoring. DOSI uses non-ionizing near-infrared light to provide non-invasive measures of absolute concentrations of tissue chromophores such as oxyhemoglobin. In 2011, we reported a new DOSI prognostic marker, oxyhemoglobin flare: a transient increase in oxyhemoglobin capable of discriminating NAC responders within the first day of treatment. In this follow-up study, DOSI was used to confirm the presence of the flare as well as to investigate whether DOSI markers of NAC response are regimen dependent.
METHODS
This dual-center study examined 54 breast tumors receiving NAC measured with DOSI before therapy and the first week following chemotherapy administration. Patients were treated with either a standard of care maximum tolerated dose (MTD) regimen or an investigational metronomic (MET) regimen. Changes in tumor chromophores were tracked throughout the first week and compared to pathologic response and treatment regimen at specific days utilizing generalized estimating equations (GEE).
RESULTS
Within patients receiving MTD therapy, the oxyhemoglobin flare was confirmed as a prognostic DOSI marker for response appearing as soon as day 1 with post hoc GEE analysis demonstrating a difference of 48.77% between responders and non-responders (p < 0.0001). Flare was not observed in patients receiving MET therapy. Within all responding patients, the specific treatment was a significant predictor of day 1 changes in oxyhemoglobin, showing a difference of 39.45% (p = 0.0010) between patients receiving MTD and MET regimens.
CONCLUSIONS
DOSI optical biomarkers are differentially sensitive to MTD and MET regimens at early timepoints suggesting the specific treatment regimen should be considered in future DOSI studies. Additionally, DOSI may help to identify regimen-specific responses in a more personalized manner, potentially providing critical feedback necessary to implement adaptive changes to the treatment strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32169100
doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01262-1
pii: 10.1186/s13058-020-01262-1
pmc: PMC7071774
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
29Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA142989
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA079778
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA080098
Pays : United States
Références
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
J Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;57 Suppl 1:34S-9S
pubmed: 26834099
NMR Biomed. 2010 Apr;23(3):233-41
pubmed: 20175134
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug;7(8):455-65
pubmed: 20531380
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jun 21;62(12):4637-4653
pubmed: 28402286
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Feb;113(3):509-17
pubmed: 18327670
Med Phys. 2008 Jun;35(6):2443-51
pubmed: 18649477
Radiology. 2018 Dec;289(3):618-627
pubmed: 30179110
Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):424-31
pubmed: 15516615
J Biomed Opt. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):044005
pubmed: 16965162
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;74(2):229-38
pubmed: 24871032
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Oct;52(Pt 2):16-25
pubmed: 29024776
J Biomed Opt. 2008 Sep-Oct;13(5):050509
pubmed: 19021379
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Mar;184(3):868-77
pubmed: 15728611
Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):663-72
pubmed: 22623692
Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 15;78(20):5891-5900
pubmed: 30104241
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 15;20(14):3632-6
pubmed: 24748554
J Clin Invest. 2000 Apr;105(8):1045-7
pubmed: 10772648
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):27-39
pubmed: 29242041
Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 15;76(20):5933-5944
pubmed: 27527559
Annu Rev Physiol. 2019 Feb 10;81:505-534
pubmed: 30742782
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):778-786
pubmed: 29431574
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994 Oct;11(10):2727-41
pubmed: 7931757
J Cancer. 2014 Jan 05;5(1):58-68
pubmed: 24396498
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Nov 28;369(1955):4512-30
pubmed: 22006904
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov;12(11):631-44
pubmed: 26241939
Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Jan 04;8(2):555-569
pubmed: 28270967
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012 Mar 01;4(3):
pubmed: 22296764
Appl Opt. 2000 Dec 1;39(34):6498-507
pubmed: 18354663
Transl Oncol. 2012 Aug;5(4):238-46
pubmed: 22937175
Neoplasia. 2014 Jan;16(1):84-96
pubmed: 24563621
NMR Biomed. 2011 Jul;24(6):712-20
pubmed: 21692116
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 30;108(35):14626-31
pubmed: 21852577
J Biomed Opt. 2012 Jul;17(7):071311
pubmed: 22894472
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Aug 13;367(1900):3055-72
pubmed: 19581255
Cancer Res. 2003 Aug 1;63(15):4342-6
pubmed: 12907602
Front Immunol. 2016 Dec 20;7:621
pubmed: 28066431
J Biomed Opt. 2018 Oct;24(2):1-11
pubmed: 30338678
Br J Surg. 2014 Jul;101(8):912-24
pubmed: 24838656
Cell Death Differ. 2014 Jan;21(1):15-25
pubmed: 23787994
Cancer Res. 2012 Sep 1;72(17):4318-28
pubmed: 22777823
Cancer Lett. 2015 Mar 28;358(2):100-106
pubmed: 25541061
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 1;20(23):6006-15
pubmed: 25294916
Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Jun;4(6):423-36
pubmed: 15170445
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 1;23(19):5769-5778
pubmed: 28679773
Cell. 2010 Mar 19;140(6):883-99
pubmed: 20303878
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 10;26(5):778-85
pubmed: 18258986
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 14;20(1):56
pubmed: 29898762
Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 1;72(5):1103-15
pubmed: 22237627