Midwifery student's perceptions of completing a portfolio of evidence for initial registration: A qualitative exploratory study.

ANMAC standard 8.11 Education Midwifery students Portfolios ePortfolio

Journal

Nurse education in practice
ISSN: 1873-5223
Titre abrégé: Nurse Educ Pract
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101090848

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 28 10 2019
revised: 08 01 2020
accepted: 13 01 2020
pubmed: 15 3 2020
medline: 15 3 2020
entrez: 15 3 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Accreditation Council (ANMAC) has set regulatory standards, that require midwifery students to verify how they have met ANMAC standard 8.11 requirements prior to registration as a midwife. The most common formats for recording achievement of the ANMAC requirements are paper-based or electronic portfolios. Research was conducted to compare student's experiences of completing their university portfolio format. Focus group interviews were held at two south east Queensland universities. This study has found that there is disparity between universities in the level of detail documenting evidence of midwifery experiences. The paper-based portfolio was criticised for not having sufficient space for the students to explain the extent of their experiences, in contrast students completing the ePortfolio felt their reflective entries were excessive. Some students felt the portfolio was not being used to its full potential with suggestions that all experiences that fall within the midwife scope of practice should be recorded as evidence of practice experiences. Students felt the current ANMAC Standard 8.11 requirements limit the range of experiences and are repetitive in requiring up to 100 recordings for some experiences. No nationally agreed format exists of how students are required to document their required ANMAC experiences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32171172
pii: S1471-5953(19)30908-4
doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102696
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102696

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest This study received ethical approval from two universities. There was a potential conflict of interest as the researchers were academics at the universities the participants were studying at. However, no student at any-time was approached or conversed with about the research project by a midwifery academic/researcher known to them. This study engaged an academic from the opposite university to recruit and interview the participants at the other university.

Auteurs

Michelle Gray (M)

College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia. Electronic address: michelle.gray@cdu.edu.au.

Terri Downer (T)

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: tdowner@usc.edu.au.

Tanya Capper (T)

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: t.capper@cqu.edu.au.

Classifications MeSH