Changes to Venous Flow Coupler Signal during DIEP Flap Inset Can Be Predictive of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.


Journal

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
ISSN: 1098-8947
Titre abrégé: J Reconstr Microsurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8502670

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 17 3 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 16 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

 Venous flow couplers are typically used to monitor free flaps during the postoperative period, with a continuous venous signal available immediately after completion of the anastomosis. Intraoperative loss of the coupler signal is not uncommon and may require adjustments in free flap inset and even flap thickness to get the venous signal to return. The effects of intraoperative coupler signal loss and the role of this technology on flap outcomes have not been evaluated. We hypothesized that the use of intraoperative coupler can be protective of both early and late flap complications by preventing unfavorable flap insets.  All patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and June 2019 by single microsurgery team were included. Flap inset and inset changes based on flow coupler signal problems were reviewed in the procedure notes. Patient demographics data and clinical outcomes were analyzed with comprehensive chart review.  Forty-four consecutive patients with 69 free flaps were identified. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or venous coupler size used in venous anastomosis. Although the number of operating room take backs for venous insufficiency was not significantly different between two groups, the free flaps with inset change had significantly higher complications that required later surgical intervention (  Surgeons should be aware that intraoperative coupler signal loss can be associated with poor clinical outcomes postoperatively and these flaps may require more perfusion imaging, flap debulking, or even additional venous anastomosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
 Venous flow couplers are typically used to monitor free flaps during the postoperative period, with a continuous venous signal available immediately after completion of the anastomosis. Intraoperative loss of the coupler signal is not uncommon and may require adjustments in free flap inset and even flap thickness to get the venous signal to return. The effects of intraoperative coupler signal loss and the role of this technology on flap outcomes have not been evaluated. We hypothesized that the use of intraoperative coupler can be protective of both early and late flap complications by preventing unfavorable flap insets.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
 All patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and June 2019 by single microsurgery team were included. Flap inset and inset changes based on flow coupler signal problems were reviewed in the procedure notes. Patient demographics data and clinical outcomes were analyzed with comprehensive chart review.
RESULTS RESULTS
 Forty-four consecutive patients with 69 free flaps were identified. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or venous coupler size used in venous anastomosis. Although the number of operating room take backs for venous insufficiency was not significantly different between two groups, the free flaps with inset change had significantly higher complications that required later surgical intervention (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
 Surgeons should be aware that intraoperative coupler signal loss can be associated with poor clinical outcomes postoperatively and these flaps may require more perfusion imaging, flap debulking, or even additional venous anastomosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32172526
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1703014
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

466-470

Informations de copyright

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Auteurs

Salih Colakoglu (S)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.

Ariel Johnson (A)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.

Jaclyn Anderson (J)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.

David Woodbridge Mathes (DW)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.

Tae Woon Chong (TW)

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH