Effects of a short health education intervention on physical activity, arterial stiffness and cardiac autonomic function in individuals with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk.
Blood Pressure
/ physiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ physiopathology
Counseling
/ methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise
/ physiology
Female
Health Education
/ methods
Humans
Hypertension
/ physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Pulse Wave Analysis
Risk Factors
Sedentary Behavior
Time Factors
Vascular Stiffness
/ physiology
Walking
/ physiology
Arterial stiffness
Cardiac autonomic function
Cardiovascular risk
Counseling
Daily physical activity
Education
Primary care
Journal
Patient education and counseling
ISSN: 1873-5134
Titre abrégé: Patient Educ Couns
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8406280
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
12
05
2019
revised:
02
03
2020
accepted:
06
03
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
17
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study evaluated the effects of a short health education and counseling intervention program, in a primary healthcare setting, on daily physical activity (PA), arterial stiffness, and cardiac autonomic function in individuals with moderate-to-high risk of cardiovascular disease. This was a parallel-group study with a 4-month-long intervention, plus 8 months of follow-up. 164 individuals with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk were allocated to either an intervention (n = 87) or a control group (n = 77). The intervention consisted of 3 walking and face-to-face group sessions plus text messages. Primary outcome was daily PA (sedentary time, light and moderate-to-vigorous PA, all in min/day); secondary outcomes were arterial stiffness i.e., carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV, m/s)] and cardiac autonomic function [(i.e., standard deviation of all N-N intervals (SDNN, ms) and absolute high frequency (HF, ms There were not significant group*time interactions for sedentary time [-7.4 (7.6); p = 0.331)], light PA [4.4 (6.4); p = 0.491] or moderate-to-vigorous PA [0.1 (2.6); p = 0.938]. Considering secondary outcomes, there were not significant group*time interactions for cfPWV [0.09 (0.18); p = 0.592], Ln_SDNN [0.09 (0.06); p = 0.148], or Ln_HF [0.16 (0.14); p = 0.263]. The program did not improve daily PA, arterial stiffness, or the autonomic cardiac function. Primary care staff should consider longer or other types of intervention to improve daily PA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32173214
pii: S0738-3991(20)30139-7
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.005
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
1856-1863Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Authors have no conflict of interest with companies or manufactures. Results of the study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation.