Knowing what's coming: Anticipatory audio cues can mitigate motion sickness.
Anticipation
Autonomous driving
Carsickness
Countermeasures
Motion sickness
Multisensory integration
Unpredictable motion
Journal
Applied ergonomics
ISSN: 1872-9126
Titre abrégé: Appl Ergon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0261412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
17
07
2019
revised:
16
01
2020
accepted:
28
01
2020
entrez:
17
3
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Being able to anticipate upcoming motion is known to potentially mitigate sickness resulting from provocative motion. We investigated whether auditory cues could increase anticipation and subsequently reduce motion sickness. Participants (N = 20) were exposed on a sled on a rail track to two 15-min conditions. Both were identical in terms of motion, being composed of the same repeated 9 m fore-aft displacements, with a semi-random timing of pauses and direction. The auditory cues were either 1) informative on the timing and direction of the upcoming motion, or 2) non-informative. Illness ratings were recorded at 1-min intervals using a 11-point scale. After exposure, average illness ratings were significantly lower for the condition that contained informative auditory cues, as compared to the condition without informative cues. This knowledge, i.e. that auditory signals can improve anticipation to motion, could be of importance in reducing carsickness in domains such as that of autonomous vehicles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32174356
pii: S0003-6870(20)30021-1
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103068
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103068Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: This research was supported by Ford Research and Advanced Engineering. There was no sponsor decisive involvement in the design of the experiment, nor in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data and the decision to submit for publication.