Surgically induced astigmatism and refractive outcomes following phacotrabeculectomy.


Journal

Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
entrez: 17 3 2020
pubmed: 17 3 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To objectively evaluate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) after phacotrabeculectomy using keratometry and topography and to compare the magnitude of SIA and the refractive outcomes of single-site and twin-site phacotrabeculectomies. Forty prospective subjects were enrolled in the study and were randomized into single-site and twin-site cohorts. SIA was objectively assessed using keratometry and Orbscan before and at three months after surgery. For both cohorts, the changes in SIA were assessed using power vector analysis compared at the third month after surgery. Each cohort consisted of 20 eyes. The preoperative parameters and postoperative IOP were comparable and similar, respectively, in both the cohorts (P = 0.1). Majority of the patients in both the cohorts had preoperative against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism. The median change in SIA at the three-month postoperative visit was similar in both the cohorts, with a small increase in ATR astigmatism. Although the SIA change measured by keratometry in the J0 component was similar in both the groups (P = 0.54), that of J45 was significantly different (P = 0.01). However, the median change in SIA was similar in both the groups for both the J0 (P = 0.52) and J45 components (P = 0.94) when measured by Orbscan. The SIA in both the groups measured with keratometry (P = 0.62) and topography (P = 0.52) were clinically and statistically similar. In both the groups, the refraction was similar at 1 month and 3 months. The SIA as measured with keratometry and topography was similar in the single-site and twin-site phacotrabeculectomy cohorts at the end of 3-months. The postoperative refraction was stabilized in 1-month in both the groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32174580
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2020_68_4_609_280691
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_588_19
pmc: PMC7210854
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

609-614

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None

Références

Ophthalmology. 2011 Jan;118(1):71-6
pubmed: 20691480
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jul;115(7):1130-1133.e1
pubmed: 18171584
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Aug 24;10:1393-9
pubmed: 26347460
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1997;(224):39
pubmed: 9589728
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Apr;27(4):518-23
pubmed: 11311616
Ophthalmology. 2008 Mar;115(3):447-454.e1
pubmed: 17825417
Ophthalmology. 2002 Dec;109(12):2215-24; quiz 2225, 2231
pubmed: 12466161
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;63(7):606-10
pubmed: 26458479
Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Jun;74(6):367-75
pubmed: 9255814
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Dec;22(10):1485-91
pubmed: 9051507
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Jun;29(6):484-9
pubmed: 9640570
J Glaucoma. 2016 Apr;25(4):e308-12
pubmed: 25719233
J Glaucoma. 2016 May;25(5):e531-5
pubmed: 27120136
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):2018-27
pubmed: 22018365
Klin Oczna. 1997;99(5):313-5
pubmed: 9640018
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jan;27(1):31-49
pubmed: 11165856
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):799-802
pubmed: 16765798
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992 Sep;18(5):429-43
pubmed: 1403745
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(5):e2405
pubmed: 26844453
Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1971 Jun;48(6):467-78
pubmed: 5281065
Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jul;83(7):779-82
pubmed: 10381662
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Apr;24(4):515-8
pubmed: 9584248
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;11(3):296-303
pubmed: 27621788
Br J Ophthalmol. 1991 Apr;75(4):217-8
pubmed: 2021587
Ophthalmic Surg. 1979 Jan;10(1):38-49
pubmed: 424172
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;89(8):1021-5
pubmed: 16024858
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;237(11):887-92
pubmed: 10541897
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Jan;25(1):77-82
pubmed: 9888081

Auteurs

Sirisha Senthil (S)

VST Glaucoma Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Sanket Deshmukh (S)

GMRV Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Kiranmaye Turaga (K)

GMRV Campus, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Veerendranath Pesala (V)

Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Praveen K Bandela (PK)

Brien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Jonnadula Ganesh (J)

VST Glaucoma Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Chandrasekhar Garudadri (C)

VST Glaucoma Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Shrikant Bharadwaj (S)

VST Glaucoma Center, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH