Intraoperative injection versus sponge-applied mitomycin C during trabeculectomy: One-year study.
Injectable mitomycin C
sponge soaked mitomycin C
trabeculectomy
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
17
3
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the safety and efficacy of mitomycin C (MMC) injection versus sponge during trabeculectomy. It is a prospective analysis of patients who underwent trabeculectomy with MMC and followed up for 1 year, divided into two groups, namely, group 1- injection (n = 21), group 2-> sponge (n = 21). The same concentration of MMC was used for both groups. Inclusion criteria were trabeculectomies with MMC for intraocular pressure (IOP) control in eyes with glaucoma (primary + secondary) with a follow-up of 1 year. Mean preoperative IOP in group 1 was 29.00 ± 11.92 mmHg and group 2 was 25.87 ± 11.09 mmHg, which reduced to 12.19 ± 4.03 and 15.56 ± 10.72 mmHg at final visit with P value of 0.0002 and 0.001, respectively. Mean preoperative number of antiglaucoma medications was 2.4 ± 0.87 in group 1 and 2.3 ± 0.96 in group 2, which reduced to 0.38 ± 0.5 and 0.91 ± 0.85 with P value of 0.001 and 0.0003, respectively. The complete success rate was 52.4% in the injection group and 26.1% in the sponge group at end of 1 year. Overall, success rate (complete + qualified) was 90.5% and 87% in group 1 and group 2 at final visit. All major complications were encountered in sponge group. 1 (11.1%) patient developed choroidal detachment and one had malignant glaucoma which got resolved by medical management. 33.3% cases had encapsulated bleb which received bleb needling. 44.4% cases underwent Argon laser suture lysis postoperatively. The MMC injection may be as safe and as effective as conventional sponge application with comparable estimated complete treatment success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32174581
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2020_68_4_615_280695
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_963_19
pmc: PMC7210852
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mitomycin
50SG953SK6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
615-619Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Int Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;27(6):351-5
pubmed: 17549432
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1997 Oct;28(10):805-9
pubmed: 9336772
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;16(2):107-13
pubmed: 15744141
Dev Ophthalmol. 2012;50:79-89
pubmed: 22517175
Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):712-22
pubmed: 22244944
Curr Eye Res. 2002 Oct;25(4):221-5
pubmed: 12658555
Korean J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jun;10(1):42-7
pubmed: 8755201
Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Aug;115(8):969-74
pubmed: 9258217
J Glaucoma. 2001 Oct;10(5 Suppl 1):S81-4
pubmed: 11890288
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007 Jan;6(1):27-32
pubmed: 17181449
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 20;9:1945-51
pubmed: 26527859
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;253(7):1153-9
pubmed: 25940554
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997 Jul;38(8):1639-46
pubmed: 9224294
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Dec;14(6):491-6
pubmed: 9867332
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Fall;11(3):233-41
pubmed: 8590255
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 May;36(4):316-22
pubmed: 18700917
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995 Mar;233(3):154-62
pubmed: 7758983
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1):CD002897
pubmed: 11279773
Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;86(8):866-70
pubmed: 19086929
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jul;109(7):1336-41; discussion 1341-2
pubmed: 12093659
Ophthalmic Surg. 1993 Apr;24(4):249-55
pubmed: 8321506
Ophthalmologica. 1998;212(1):37-42
pubmed: 9438583