Musical Emotion Perception in Bimodal Patients: Relative Weighting of Musical Mode and Tempo Cues.
bimodal
cochlear implant
frequency following response
hearing loss
music perception
musical emotion
psychophysical tuning curve
spectral modulation detection
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2019
accepted:
29
01
2020
entrez:
17
3
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several cues are used to convey musical emotion, the two primary being musical mode and musical tempo. Specifically, major and minor modes tend to be associated with positive and negative valence, respectively, and songs at fast tempi have been associated with more positive valence compared to songs at slow tempi (Balkwill and Thompson, 1999; Webster and Weir, 2005). In Experiment I, we examined the relative weighting of musical tempo and musical mode among adult cochlear implant (CI) users combining electric and contralateral acoustic stimulation, or "bimodal" hearing. Our primary hypothesis was that bimodal listeners would utilize both tempo and mode cues in their musical emotion judgments in a manner similar to normal-hearing listeners. Our secondary hypothesis was that low-frequency (LF) spectral resolution in the non-implanted ear, as quantified via psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) at 262 and 440 Hz, would be significantly correlated with degree of bimodal benefit for musical emotion perception. In Experiment II, we investigated across-channel spectral resolution using a spectral modulation detection (SMD) task and neural representation of temporal fine structure via the frequency following response (FFR) for a 170-ms /da/ stimulus. Results indicate that CI-alone performance was driven almost exclusively by tempo cues, whereas bimodal listening demonstrated use of both tempo and mode. Additionally, bimodal benefit for musical emotion perception may be correlated with spectral resolution in the non-implanted ear via SMD, as well as neural representation of
Identifiants
pubmed: 32174809
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00114
pmc: PMC7054459
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
114Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC009404
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U54 HD083211
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 D’Onofrio, Caldwell, Limb, Smith, Kessler and Gifford.
Références
Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13(2):105-12
pubmed: 18057874
Cochlear Implants Int. 2009;10 Suppl 1:96-9
pubmed: 19230032
Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):750-7
pubmed: 21730859
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):e972-e978
pubmed: 30247429
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 May;133(5):3030-8
pubmed: 23654406
Hear Res. 2008 Jan;235(1-2):143-56
pubmed: 18093766
Nature. 2002 Mar 7;416(6876):87-90
pubmed: 11882898
Cochlear Implants Int. 2003 Jun;4(2):85-95
pubmed: 18792140
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518771176
pubmed: 29716437
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Jul;21(4):684-94
pubmed: 23613083
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53(3):159-64
pubmed: 24456178
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Jun;125(6):470-7
pubmed: 26681623
Hear Res. 2017 Sep;352:30-39
pubmed: 28088500
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):576-581
pubmed: 29683995
Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):301-15
pubmed: 18003871
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Feb;19(2):120-34
pubmed: 18669126
Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):173-85
pubmed: 15064662
Ear Hear. 1997 Jun;18(3):252-60
pubmed: 9201460
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Feb;63(2):524-32
pubmed: 670549
Update Univ S C Dep Music. 2012 Mar 23;30(2):5-10
pubmed: 23469365
Ear Hear. 2018 Jul/Aug;39(4):679-686
pubmed: 29194080
Cochlear Implants Int. 2002 Mar;3(1):29-53
pubmed: 18792110
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jul;136(1):EL33-9
pubmed: 24993235
Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 Feb;12(1):21-6
pubmed: 21756455
Br J Audiol. 2000 Aug;34(4):205-24
pubmed: 10997450
Int J Audiol. 2011 Apr;50(4):237-42
pubmed: 21299376
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jun;58(6):363-372
pubmed: 30987476
Int J Audiol. 2015 Feb;54(2):114-23
pubmed: 25177899
Int J Audiol. 2005 Jul;44(7):408-20
pubmed: 16136791
Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):628-40
pubmed: 15699060
Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(2):111-41
pubmed: 9818509
Int J Audiol. 2012 May;51(5):389-98
pubmed: 22201528
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):501-516
pubmed: 30285977
Hear Res. 2014 Feb;308:13-26
pubmed: 23665130
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520902001
pubmed: 32003296
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 7;30(14):4922-6
pubmed: 20371812
Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14 Suppl 1:14-21
pubmed: 19390171
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2268-79
pubmed: 20681749
Otol Neurotol. 2003 Mar;24(2):243-54
pubmed: 12621339
Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Jul;127(7):682-6
pubmed: 17573562
Int J Audiol. 2011 Apr;50(4):270-8
pubmed: 21190394
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 28;10(8):e0136685
pubmed: 26317976
Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):411-8
pubmed: 19474735
Cochlear Implants Int. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 3:S114-20
pubmed: 26561882
Child Neuropsychol. 2016;22(3):366-80
pubmed: 25562621
Hear Res. 2017 Feb;344:148-157
pubmed: 27864051