A New Rehabilitative Mechanism in Primary Motor Cortex After Peripheral Trauma.
brachial plexus lesions
functional connectivity
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
motor cortex
neuronal plasticity
peripheral nerve reconstruction
rehabilitation
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
29
08
2019
accepted:
04
02
2020
entrez:
17
3
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Homuncular organization, i.e., the neuronal representation of the human body within the primary motor cortex, is one of the most fundamental principles of the human brain. Despite this, in rare peripheral nerve surgery patients, the transformation of a monofunctional (diaphragm activation) into a bifunctional motor area (diaphragm and arm activation is controlled by the same cortical area) has previously been demonstrated. The mechanisms behind this transformation are not fully known. To investigate this transformation of a monofunctional area we investigate functional connectivity changes in a unique and highly instructive pathophysiological patient model. These patients suffer from complete brachial plexus avulsion with arm paralysis and had been treated with reconnection of the end of the musculocutaneous nerve to the side of a fully functional phrenic nerve to regain function. Task-based functional connectivity between the arm representations and the diaphragm (phrenic nerve) representations were examined in six patients and 12 aged matched healthy controls at ultra-high field MRI while they either performed or tried isolated elbow flexion or conducted forced abdominal inspiration. Functional connectivity values are considerably increased between the diseased arm and the bilateral diaphragm areas while trying strong muscle tension in the diseased arm as compared to the healthy arm. This effect was not found as compared to the healthy arm in the patient group. This connectivity was stronger between ipsilateral than between corresponding contralateral brain regions. No corresponding differences were found in healthy subjects. Our data suggests that the increased functional connectivity between the deprived arm area and the diaphragm area drives biceps muscle function. From this findings we infer that this new rehabilitative mechanism in the primary motor cortex may establish new intrahemispheric connections within the brain and the motor cortex in particular to reroute the output of a completely denervated motor area. This study extend current knowledge about neuroplasticity within the motor cortex.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32174882
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00125
pmc: PMC7056825
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
125Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Fischmeister, Amini, Matt, Reinecke, Schmidhammer and Beisteiner.
Références
Brain. 2009 Nov;132(Pt 11):3122-33
pubmed: 19737843
Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2181-91
pubmed: 18567624
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:149-86
pubmed: 9530495
Brain Res. 2013 Apr 4;1504:58-73
pubmed: 23396112
Neuroscientist. 2011 Aug;17(4):407-22
pubmed: 21531986
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:320-41
pubmed: 23994314
Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):1015-21
pubmed: 21620980
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Mar;42(3):E14
pubmed: 28245732
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Mar;42(3):E13
pubmed: 28245665
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Aug;38(8):4125-4156
pubmed: 28544076
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
pubmed: 22019881
Exp Neurol. 2008 Jul;212(1):132-44
pubmed: 18501895
Arch Neurol. 2011 Nov;68(11):1467-70
pubmed: 22084132
Neuron. 2018 Dec 5;100(5):1252-1266.e3
pubmed: 30482692
Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 18;9:1116
pubmed: 30619069
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):90-101
pubmed: 17560126
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(6):577-9
pubmed: 21436389
Front Neurosci. 2011 Apr 01;5:32
pubmed: 21503145
Neurosci Res. 2018 Oct;135:32-36
pubmed: 29258852
Compr Physiol. 2012 Apr;2(2):1387-415
pubmed: 23798304
J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):386-95
pubmed: 16716573
Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-41
pubmed: 22642651
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;151:73-102
pubmed: 29519481
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 28;10:381
pubmed: 27516736
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):173-80
pubmed: 14741654
J Neurosurg. 2013 Apr;118(4):725-9
pubmed: 23373808
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Oct 11;3:498-506
pubmed: 24273732
Hum Brain Mapp. 2000 Nov;11(3):207-13
pubmed: 11098798
Neuroimage. 2001 Jun;13(6 Pt 1):1016-26
pubmed: 11352607
Front Neurol. 2016 Dec 23;7:240
pubmed: 28066323
Exp Neurol. 2009 Jun;217(2):388-94
pubmed: 19345686
J Physiol. 2013 Jan 1;591(1):17-31
pubmed: 23090951