Missing Links. Indigenous Life and Evolutionary Thought in the History of Russian Ethnography.
Gilyak
Nivkh
Russia
Siberia
USSR
evolutionism
history of ethnography
indigenism
kinship
Journal
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
ISSN: 1522-2365
Titre abrégé: Ber Wiss
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7909914
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
17
3
2020
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
17
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The history of Russian social anthropology has long been best known for the work of three, late nineteenth-century "exile ethnographers," each sent to the Russian Far East for their anti-tsarist activities as students. All three men-Vladimir Bogoraz, Vladimir Iokhel'son, and Lev Shternberg-produced voluminous and celebrated works on Russian far eastern indigenous life, but it was the young Shternberg who had perhaps the most profound effect on setting the agenda for the canonic evolutionist line soon to take hold in late Russian imperial and early Soviet ethnography. This essay draws on archival, library, and field research to revisit the life and work of Shternberg in order to tell the story of "group marriage" that he documented for the life of one Sakhalin Island indigenous people, Gilyaks (or Nivkhgu, Nivkhi). Documented in this way by Shternberg, the Nivkh kinship system proved a crucial "missing link" for Friedrich Engels, who had long been eager to provide evidence of primitive communism as man's natural state. For Gilyaks, the die was cast. Their role as the quintessential savages of Engels' favor made them famous in Russian and Soviet ethnographic literature, and significantly enhanced their importance to Soviet government planners. This essay tracks that episode and its aftermaths as a pivotal moment in the history of Russian social anthropology and of evolutionist thought more broadly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32176369
doi: 10.1002/bewi.201900022
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
119-140Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Références
Barnes, Robert Harrison, Kedang: A Study in the Collective Thought of an Eastern Indonesian People (Oxford: Clarendon, 1974).
Black, Lydia, “Relative Status of Wife Givers and Wife Takers in Gilyak Society,” American Anthropologist 74, no. 5 (1972): 1244-1248.
Black, Lydia, “Dogs, Bears and Killer Whales: An Analysis of the Nivkh Symbolic System” (PhD thesis, University Massachusetts, Amherst, 1973.
Bloch, Maurice, Marxism and Anthropology: The History of a Relationship (London: Oxford University Press, 1983).
Boas, Franz, The Mind of Primitive Man (New York: MacMillan, 1927 [1911]).
Brower Daniel, Training the Nihilists (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975).
Chekhov, Anton, Ostrov Sakhalin: Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem, vols. 14-15 (Moscow: Nauka, 1978).
Collier, Jane, and Sylvia Yanagisako (eds.), Gender and Kinship: Essays toward a Unified Analysis (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987).
Defoe, Daniel, The Wonderful Life and Surprising Adventures of the Renowned Hero Robinson Crusoe (Philadelphia: Cist, 1789).
Defoe, Daniel, The Farther Adventures of Robinson Crusoe of York, Mariner (London: Boy's Own Paper, 1925).
Engels, Friedrich, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State: In Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan (New York: International Publishers, 1972).
Faubion, James, “Kinship Is Dead: Long Live Kinship,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38 (1996): 67-91.
Fison, Lorimer, and Alfred W. Howitt, Kamilaroi and Kurnai (Melbourne: George Robertson, 1880).
Foucault, Michel, An Introduction, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1 (New York: Vintage, 1990).
Freed, Stanley, Ruth Freed, and Laila Williamson, “Capitalist Philanthropy and Russian Revolutionaries: The Jesup North Pacific Expedition (1897-1902),” American Anthropologist 90 (1988): 7-24.
Gagen-Torn, Nina Ivanovna, Lev Iakovlevich Shternberg (Moscow: Nauka, 1975).
Gassenschmidt, Christoph, Jewish Liberal Politics in Tsarist Russia, 1900-1914: The Modernization of Russian Jewry (New York: New York University Press, 1995).
Gleason, Abbott, Young Russia: The Genesis of Russian Radicalism in the 1860s (New York: Viking, 1980).
Goody, Jack, The Oriental, the Ancient and the Primitive: Systems of Marriage and the Family in the Pre-Industrial Societies of Asia (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Grant, Bruce, In the Soviet House of Culture: A Century of Perestroikas (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).
Haberer, Erich E., Jews and Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Hawes, Charles H., In the Uttermost East (London: Harper, 1904).
Hegel, Georg W. F., Theses on the Philosophy of History (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988).
Hiatt, Lester, Arguments about Aborigines: Australia and the Evolution of Social Anthropology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Hoogenboom, Hilda, “Vera Figner and Revolutionary Autobiographies: The Influence of Gender on Genre,” in Women in Russia and Ukraine, ed. Rosalind Marsh (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 78-92.
Kohler, Josef, On the Prehistory of Marriage: Totemism, Group Marriage and Mother Right, trans. from the German by Robert H. Barnes and Ruth Barnes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975).
Krader, Lawrence, The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx (Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1974)
Kreinovich, Erukhim, “Perezhitki rodovoi sobstvennosti i gruppovogo braka u giliakov,” Trudy lnstituta Antropologii, Arkheologii i Etnografii 4 (1936): 711-754.
Krol’, Moisei A., “Vospominaniia o L. Ia. Shternberge,” Katorga i Ssylka 8-9 (1929): 57-58.
Krupnik, Igor, “The Bogoras Enigma,” in Anthropological Concepts in the Postmodern Era, ed. Vaclav Hubinger (London: Routledge, 1996), 35-52.
Leacock, Eleanor Burke. „Introduction,“ in Friedrich Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State: In Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan (New York: International Publishers, 1972), 7-67.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, “The Structural Study of Myth,” in Claude Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology, trans. Claire Jacobson (New York and London: Basic Books, 1963), 206-231.
LéviStrauss, Claude, The Elementary Structures of Kinship, trans. James Harle Bell, John Richard von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969).
Malinin, Viktor A., Filosofiia revoliutsionnogo narodnichestva (Moscow: Nauka, 1972).
McConkey, James, To a Distant Island (New York: Dutton, 1986).
Morgan, Lewis H., Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family (Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1871).
Morgan, Lewis H., Ancient Society (London: MacMillan, 1877).
Murdock, George P., Social Structure (New York: MacMillan, 1949).
Needham, Rodney (ed.), Rethinking Kinship and Marriage (London: Tavistock, 1971).
Ossendowski, Ferdinand, Man and Mystery in Asia (New York: Dutton, 1924).
Panov, A. A., Sakhalin kak koloniia (St. Petersburg: I. D. Sykin, 1905)
Popkin, Cathy, “Chekhov as Ethnographer: Epistemological Crisis on Sakhalin Island,” Slavic Review 51, no. 1 (1992): 36-51.
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R., Structure and Function in Primitive Society (London: Cohen and West, 1952).
Reichard, Gladys A., “Social Life,” in General Anthropology, ed. Franz Boas (New York: D. C. Heath, 1938), 409-486.
Rinsifai [Rinzō], Mamiya, San Kokf, Tsou Ran, To Sets, ou Aperçu général des trois royaumes (Paris: Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland, 1832).
Rivers, William H. R., The Todas (London: MacMillan, 1906).
Rivers, William H. R., Robert R. Marett, and Northcote W. Thomas (eds.), Anthropological Essays presented to Edward Burnett Tylor (Oxford: Clarendon, 1907).
Sahlins, Marshall, Culture and Practical Reason (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976)
Sapir, Boris (ed.), Lavrov: Years of Emigration Letters and Documents in Two Volumes, vol. 2 (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 1974).
Schneider, David, A Critique of the Study of Kinship (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1984).
Schweitzer, Peter, “Spouse-Exchange in North-Eastern Siberia: On Kinship and Sexual Relations and their Transformations,” Vienna Contributions to Ethnology and Anthropology 5 (1989): 17-38.
Shternberg, Lev, “Giliaki (I),” Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie 28, no. 60 (1904a): 1-42.
Shternberg, Lev, “Giliaki (II),” Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie 28, no. 61 (1904b): 19-55.
Shternberg, Lev, “Giliaki (III),” Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie 28, no. 63 (1904c): 66-119.
Shternberg, Lev, Giliaki, orochi, gol'dy, negidal'tsy, ainy (Khabarovsk: Dal'nevostochnoe knizhnoe gosurdarstvennoe izdatels'tvo, 1933a).
Shternberg, Lev, Sem'ia i rod u narodov Severo-Vostochnoi Azii, ed. Ian P. Al'kor [alias Koshkin] (Leningrad: Institut Narodov Severa, 1933b).
Shternberg, Lev, The Social Organization of the Gilyak, ed. Bruce Grant (New York: American Museum of Natural History, 1999).
Smoliak, Anna V., “Zametki po etnografii nivkhov Amurskogo Limana,” Trudy Instituta Etnografii 56 (1960): 96-98.
Smoliak, Anna V., Etnicheskie protsessy u narodov Nizhnego Amura i Sakhalina (Moscow: Nauka, 1975).
Stephan, John, Sakhalin: A History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).
Taksami, Chuner M., “Issledovatel’, drug i uchitel’ nivkhov,” in Issledovateli Sakhalina i Kuril, ed. Ivan A. Senchenko (Iuzhno-Sakhalinsk: Sakhalinskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1961), 103-131.
Troitskii, Nikolai, “Druz′ia naroda ili besy?” Rodina 2 (1996): 67-72.
Tvardovskaia, Valentian A., “People′s Will,” Great Soviet Encyclopedia 17 (New York: MacMillan, 1983): 617-618.
Urban, Greg, Metaphysical Community (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1996).
Venturi, Franco, Roots of Revolution: A History of the Populist and Socialist Movements in Nineteenth-Century Russia (New York: Knopf, 1960).
Vucinich, Alexander, Darwin in Russian Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).