Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
Aged
Alzheimer Disease
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Amyloid beta-Peptides
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Biomarkers
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Case-Control Studies
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neurofilament Proteins
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Peptide Fragments
/ cerebrospinal fluid
tau Proteins
/ cerebrospinal fluid
Alzheimer’s disease
amyloid-β
biomarkers
cerebral amyloid angiopathy
cerebrospinal fluid
Journal
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD
ISSN: 1875-8908
Titre abrégé: J Alzheimers Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9814863
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
pubmed:
17
3
2020
medline:
8
5
2021
entrez:
17
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is limited data on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in sporadic amyloid-β (Aβ) cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). To determine the profile of biomarkers relevant to neurodegenerative disease in the CSF of patients with CAA. We performed a detailed comparison of CSF markers, comparing patients with CAA, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and control (CS) participants, recruited from the Biomarkers and Outcomes in CAA (BOCAA) study, and a Specialist Cognitive Disorders Service. We included 10 CAA, 20 AD, and 10 CS participants (mean age 68.6, 62.5, and 62.2 years, respectively). In unadjusted analyses, CAA patients had a distinctive CSF biomarker profile, with significantly lower (p < 0.01) median concentrations of Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42, sAβPPα, and sAβPPβ. CAA patients had higher levels of neurofilament light (NFL) than the CS group (p < 0.01), but there were no significant differences in CSF total tau, phospho-tau, soluble TREM2 (sTREM2), or neurogranin concentrations. AD patients had higher total tau, phospho-tau and neurogranin than CS and CAA groups. In age-adjusted analyses, differences for the CAA group remained for Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42, and sAβPPβ. Comparing CAA patients with amyloid-PET positive (n = 5) and negative (n = 5) scans, PET positive individuals had lower (p < 0.05) concentrations of CSF Aβ42, and higher total tau, phospho-tau, NFL, and neurogranin concentrations, consistent with an "AD-like" profile. CAA has a characteristic biomarker profile, suggestive of a global, rather than selective, accumulation of amyloid species; we also provide evidence of different phenotypes according to amyloid-PET positivity. Further replication and validation of these preliminary findings in larger cohorts is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is limited data on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in sporadic amyloid-β (Aβ) cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).
OBJECTIVE
To determine the profile of biomarkers relevant to neurodegenerative disease in the CSF of patients with CAA.
METHODS
We performed a detailed comparison of CSF markers, comparing patients with CAA, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and control (CS) participants, recruited from the Biomarkers and Outcomes in CAA (BOCAA) study, and a Specialist Cognitive Disorders Service.
RESULTS
We included 10 CAA, 20 AD, and 10 CS participants (mean age 68.6, 62.5, and 62.2 years, respectively). In unadjusted analyses, CAA patients had a distinctive CSF biomarker profile, with significantly lower (p < 0.01) median concentrations of Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42, sAβPPα, and sAβPPβ. CAA patients had higher levels of neurofilament light (NFL) than the CS group (p < 0.01), but there were no significant differences in CSF total tau, phospho-tau, soluble TREM2 (sTREM2), or neurogranin concentrations. AD patients had higher total tau, phospho-tau and neurogranin than CS and CAA groups. In age-adjusted analyses, differences for the CAA group remained for Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42, and sAβPPβ. Comparing CAA patients with amyloid-PET positive (n = 5) and negative (n = 5) scans, PET positive individuals had lower (p < 0.05) concentrations of CSF Aβ42, and higher total tau, phospho-tau, NFL, and neurogranin concentrations, consistent with an "AD-like" profile.
CONCLUSION
CAA has a characteristic biomarker profile, suggestive of a global, rather than selective, accumulation of amyloid species; we also provide evidence of different phenotypes according to amyloid-PET positivity. Further replication and validation of these preliminary findings in larger cohorts is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32176643
pii: JAD191254
doi: 10.3233/JAD-191254
pmc: PMC7242825
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor
0
Biomarkers
0
Neurofilament Proteins
0
Peptide Fragments
0
amyloid beta-protein (1-40)
0
amyloid beta-protein (1-42)
0
amyloid beta-protein (25-38)
0
neurofilament protein L
0
tau Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1189-1201Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L023784/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Arthritis Research UK
ID : ARUK-NETWORK 2012-6-ICE
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Arthritis Research UK
ID : ARUK-PG2017-1946
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Arthritis Research UK
ID : ARUK-PG2017-1946
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Neuron. 2016 Jul 6;91(1):1-3
pubmed: 27387643
Neurologia. 2017 May;32(4):213-218
pubmed: 26778730
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Feb 15;409:116580
pubmed: 31775058
Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Mar;6(3):131-44
pubmed: 20157306
Neurology. 2017 Oct 3;89(14):1490-1498
pubmed: 28855406
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):663-72
pubmed: 17684513
Neuron. 2018 Jul 11;99(1):13-27
pubmed: 30001506
Ann Neurol. 2009 Aug;66(2):245-9
pubmed: 19743453
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jul;15(8):811-819
pubmed: 27180034
Neurology. 2018 Feb 27;90(9):e754-e762
pubmed: 29386280
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jul 2;6(243):243ra86
pubmed: 24990881
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 May 26;6(3):28
pubmed: 25031638
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Mar;17(3):377-82
pubmed: 19845747
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jul;136(1):139-152
pubmed: 29754206
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Oct;55(10):967-72
pubmed: 1431963
BMC Neurol. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):75
pubmed: 28420323
Eur Neurol. 2014;71(5-6):283-7
pubmed: 24577197
Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):184-5
pubmed: 1566067
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017 Oct 16;5(1):73
pubmed: 29037261
Neurology. 2017 Jan 10;88(2):169-176
pubmed: 27903811
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Dec;12(12):1259-1272
pubmed: 27423963
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013 Oct;39(6):593-611
pubmed: 23489283
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;88(11):982-994
pubmed: 28844070
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015 May;35(5):710-7
pubmed: 25735919
Neuron. 1991 Apr;6(4):487-98
pubmed: 1673054
EMBO Mol Med. 2016 May 02;8(5):466-76
pubmed: 26941262
Nat Rev Neurol. 2017 Aug;13(8):457-476
pubmed: 28708131
Neurology. 2010 Apr 27;74(17):1346-50
pubmed: 20421578
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1291-1295
pubmed: 27567848
Neurology. 2013 Nov 5;81(19):1659-65
pubmed: 24097810
Neurology. 2017 Nov 14;89(20):2108-2114
pubmed: 29046363
Brain. 2015 Jan;138(Pt 1):179-88
pubmed: 25367025
Neurology. 2001 Feb 27;56(4):537-9
pubmed: 11222803
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Dec 14;8(369):369ra178
pubmed: 27974666
Mol Neurodegener. 2016 Jan 12;11:3
pubmed: 26754172
Eur Neurol. 1996;36(5):268-72
pubmed: 8864706
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Nov 02;1(4):440-446
pubmed: 26835507
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):419-28
pubmed: 24581702
Neurology. 1993 Sep;43(9):1683-9
pubmed: 8414012
J Neurol. 2012 Nov;259(11):2429-33
pubmed: 22576334
J Stroke. 2018 May;20(2):228-238
pubmed: 29886723
Neuron. 1994 Jul;13(1):45-53
pubmed: 8043280
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):925-33
pubmed: 26754641