Comparison of 3-Dimensional Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography and Defecography for Assessment of Posterior Pelvic Floor Disorders.
3-Dimensional pelvic floor ultrasonography
Defecography
Pelvic floor disorders
Journal
Annals of coloproctology
ISSN: 2287-9714
Titre abrégé: Ann Coloproctol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101605121
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
28
11
2019
accepted:
09
02
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
18
3
2020
entrez:
18
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) pelvic floor ultrasonography and compare it with defecography in assessment of posterior pelvic disorders. Eligible patients were consecutive women undergoing 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography at one hospital between August 2017 and February 2019. All 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography was performed by one examiner. A total of 167 patients with suspected posterior pelvic disorder was retrospectively enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the main symptoms. There were 82 rectoceles on defecography (55 barium trapping) and 84 on 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. Each modality identified 6 enteroceles. There were 43 patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography and 41 on ultrasonography. There were 84 patients with intussusception on defecography and 41 on 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. Agreement of the 2 diagnostic tests was confirmed using Cohen's kappa value. Rectocele (kappa, 0.784) and enterocele (kappa, 0.654) both indicated good agreement between defecography and 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. In addition, pelvic floor dyssynergia (kappa, 0.406) showed moderate agreement, while internal intussusception (kappa, 0.296) had fair agreement. This study showed good agreement for detection of posterior pelvic disorders between defecography and 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32178497
pii: ac.2020.02.09
doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.02.09
pmc: PMC7508475
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
256-263Subventions
Organisme : Seoul Songdo Hospital
Références
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jan;6(1):45-53
pubmed: 14692953
Gastrointest Radiol. 1988;13(1):72-80
pubmed: 3350272
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):974-9
pubmed: 17705074
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1496-501; discussion 1501-3
pubmed: 11408873
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Aug;59(8):800-3
pubmed: 27384099
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;26(1):73-7
pubmed: 15973648
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;30(2):201-9
pubmed: 17605148
Abdom Imaging. 2013 Dec;38(6):1391-408
pubmed: 24114036
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Aug;12(8):834
pubmed: 20128840
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Nov;44(11):1575-83; discussion 1583-4
pubmed: 11711726
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Feb;9(2):159-65
pubmed: 17223941
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jun;12(6):533-9
pubmed: 19438878
Gut. 2002 Nov;51(5):695-700
pubmed: 12377809
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):1167-72
pubmed: 20860722
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;30(1):86-94
pubmed: 17587218
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;31(5):567-71
pubmed: 18409183
Endoscopy. 2000 Apr;32(4):300-5
pubmed: 10774969
World J Urol. 2011 Oct;29(5):615-23
pubmed: 21671056
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Dec;19(6):941-58
pubmed: 16198148
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 May;23(5):513-9
pubmed: 18256847
Eur Radiol. 1997;7(8):1309-17
pubmed: 9377520
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;40(1):14-27
pubmed: 22045564
Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9(3):247-51
pubmed: 6468862
Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Apr;35(4):481-7
pubmed: 2318094
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jun;30(6):835-41
pubmed: 25820786
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jun;54(6):686-92
pubmed: 21552052
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;18(5):511-4
pubmed: 11844174
Rom J Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;14(3):293-302
pubmed: 16200243
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;114(1):66-72
pubmed: 19546760
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004 Jan;19(1):60-7
pubmed: 12761642
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):740-7
pubmed: 21781232