Technical and Clinical Outcomes After Colorectal Stenting in Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction: A Single-Center Experience.
Colorectal stent
Large bowel obstruction
Stoma
Journal
Annals of coloproctology
ISSN: 2287-9714
Titre abrégé: Ann Coloproctol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101605121
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
17
02
2019
accepted:
12
06
2019
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
18
3
2020
entrez:
18
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Malignant large bowel obstruction is a surgical emergency that requires urgent decompression. Stents are increasingly being used, though reported outcomes are variable. We describe our multidisciplinary experience in using stents to manage malignant large bowel obstruction. All patients undergoing colorectal stent insertion for acute large bowel obstruction in a teaching hospital were included. Outcomes, complications, and length of stay (LOS) were recorded. Over a 7-year period, 73 procedures were performed on 67 patients (37 male, mean age of 76 years). Interventional radiology was involved in all cases. Endoscopic guidance was required in 24 cases (32.9%). In 18 patients (26.9%), treatment intent was to bridge to elective surgery; 16 had successful stent placement; all had subsequent curative resection (laparoscopic resection, 8 of 18; primary anastomosis, 14 of 18). Overall LOS, including both index admission and elective admission, was 16.4 days. Treatment intent was palliative in 49 patients (73.1%). In this group, stents were successfully placed in 41 of 49 (83.7%). Complication rate within 30 days was 20%, including perforation (2 patients), per rectal bleeding (2), stent migration (1), and stent passage (5). Nineteen patients (38.8%) required subsequent stoma formation (6, during same admission; 13, during subsequent admission). Overall LOS was 16.9 days. In our experience colorectal stents can be used effectively to manage malignant large bowel obstruction, with only selective endoscopic input. As a bridge to surgery, most patients can avoid emergency surgery and have a primary anastomosis. In the palliative setting, the complication rate is acceptable and two-thirds avoid a permanent stoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32178502
pii: ac.2019.06.12.1
doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.06.12.1
pmc: PMC8134929
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
85-89Références
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb 25;8(4):198-204
pubmed: 26962401
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1201-7
pubmed: 15164246
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Sep;58(9):838-49
pubmed: 26252845
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1290-1297
pubmed: 30171397
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 09;(11):CD007378
pubmed: 22071835
Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):517-24
pubmed: 25590181
Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;22(1):14-21
pubmed: 23183301
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):328-336
pubmed: 28664441
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;20(4):288-295
pubmed: 29091349
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):499-509
pubmed: 30006840
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Dec;14(12):1489-92
pubmed: 22443254
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1087-93
pubmed: 19935785
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 28;20(20):6309-13
pubmed: 24876752
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Oct;8(5):867-876
pubmed: 29184691
Br J Surg. 2014 Jun;101(7):867-73
pubmed: 24740753
Epidemiol Health. 2015 Mar 30;37:e2015017
pubmed: 25868638
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Dec;60(6):865-74
pubmed: 15604999