Analysis of anatomical variations of intrapelvic vessels for advanced pelvic surgery.
Iliac artery
Iliac vein
Pelvic anatomy
Rectal cancer
Journal
BMC surgery
ISSN: 1471-2482
Titre abrégé: BMC Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968567
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Mar 2020
16 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
15
12
2019
accepted:
05
03
2020
entrez:
18
3
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
12
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In pelvic surgery, it is important to anticipate potential anatomic variations, which may be unknown, and inter-relationships among intrapelvic vessels. Here, we comprehensively analyzed intrapelvic vessel patterns. This retrospective analysis included 81 patients that underwent colorectal surgery in our institution in 2016. A total of 162 half-pelvises were imaged with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. We scrutinized thin-slice images. We found variations in the number of internal iliac veins. In 47.5% of cases, one internal iliac vein drained into the ipsilateral common iliac vein in both halves of the pelvis. In the other cases, several internal iliac veins were observed in one or both halves of the pelvis. We analyzed the inter-relationships between the superior gluteal artery and the sacral nerve plexus in pelvic halves. Superior gluteal arteries ran between the 5th lumbar nerve and 1st sacral nerves, in 82% of halves, and lateral to the 5th lumbar nerve, in 17% of halves. Dorsally, the superior gluteal artery ran on the medial side of the internal iliac vein in 15% of halves. In 28% of half-pelvises, two superior gluteal veins were observed. Superior gluteal veins passed through the sacral nerve plexus lateral to 5th lumbar, between 5th lumbar and 1st sacral, and between 1st and 2nd sacral nerve, in 42.0, 47.5, and 37.7% of halves, respectively. We evaluated the rate of symmetric pelvic anatomies, and found that all anatomic variations formed symmetrically, except the number of internal iliac veins. This study clarified the anatomical variations of intrapelvic vessels and their inter-relationships. These findings will benefit our understanding of pelvic anatomy and enhance the safety of radical surgery for treating pelvic diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In pelvic surgery, it is important to anticipate potential anatomic variations, which may be unknown, and inter-relationships among intrapelvic vessels. Here, we comprehensively analyzed intrapelvic vessel patterns.
METHOD
METHODS
This retrospective analysis included 81 patients that underwent colorectal surgery in our institution in 2016. A total of 162 half-pelvises were imaged with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. We scrutinized thin-slice images.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We found variations in the number of internal iliac veins. In 47.5% of cases, one internal iliac vein drained into the ipsilateral common iliac vein in both halves of the pelvis. In the other cases, several internal iliac veins were observed in one or both halves of the pelvis. We analyzed the inter-relationships between the superior gluteal artery and the sacral nerve plexus in pelvic halves. Superior gluteal arteries ran between the 5th lumbar nerve and 1st sacral nerves, in 82% of halves, and lateral to the 5th lumbar nerve, in 17% of halves. Dorsally, the superior gluteal artery ran on the medial side of the internal iliac vein in 15% of halves. In 28% of half-pelvises, two superior gluteal veins were observed. Superior gluteal veins passed through the sacral nerve plexus lateral to 5th lumbar, between 5th lumbar and 1st sacral, and between 1st and 2nd sacral nerve, in 42.0, 47.5, and 37.7% of halves, respectively. We evaluated the rate of symmetric pelvic anatomies, and found that all anatomic variations formed symmetrically, except the number of internal iliac veins.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study clarified the anatomical variations of intrapelvic vessels and their inter-relationships. These findings will benefit our understanding of pelvic anatomy and enhance the safety of radical surgery for treating pelvic diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32178647
doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00711-0
pii: 10.1186/s12893-020-00711-0
pmc: PMC7077149
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
47Références
Clin Anat. 2012 Nov;25(8):957-60
pubmed: 23112208
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1661-1667
pubmed: 29616421
Anat Res Int. 2014;2014:597103
pubmed: 25580296
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Feb;29(2):193-200
pubmed: 24322736
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21 Suppl 3:S429-35
pubmed: 24633663
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2007;48(1):71-3
pubmed: 17502955
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jun;60(6):577-585
pubmed: 28481851
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;30(9):1157-63
pubmed: 25989927
Anat Rec. 1967 Jun;158(2):191-6
pubmed: 6034641
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):383-387
pubmed: 28500466
J Anat. 1952 Oct;86(4):423-30
pubmed: 12999644
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Apr;138(4):735-8
pubmed: 6978040
Surg Radiol Anat. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(3-4):339-41
pubmed: 12910379
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Sep;53(9):1248-57
pubmed: 20706067
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jul;58(7):677-85
pubmed: 26200682
Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Oct;34(8):731-6
pubmed: 21861157