Brivaracetam efficacy and tolerability in clinical practice: A UK-based retrospective multicenter service evaluation.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anticonvulsants
/ adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Epilepsies, Partial
/ drug therapy
Epilepsy, Generalized
/ drug therapy
Fatigue
/ chemically induced
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrrolidinones
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Seizures
/ drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
Brivaracetam
Epilepsy
Learning disability
Levetiracetam
Seizure control
Tolerability
Journal
Epilepsy & behavior : E&B
ISSN: 1525-5069
Titre abrégé: Epilepsy Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100892858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
22
11
2019
revised:
14
01
2020
accepted:
01
02
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
20
1
2021
entrez:
18
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This multicenter service evaluation explores the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in an unselected, consecutive population in 'real-life' clinical settings. We retrospectively collected data from patient records at 11 UK hospitals and epilepsy centers. Consecutive patients prescribed BRV with at least 3 months of follow-up (FU) were included. Apart from reporting effectiveness and tolerability of BRV across the whole cohort, we compared treatment outcomes depending on previous levetiracetam use (LEV+ versus LEV-), comorbid learning disability (LD+ versus LD-), and epilepsy syndrome (focal versus generalized epilepsy). Two hundred and ninety patients (46% male, median age: 38 years, range: 15 to 77) with ≥3 months of FU were included. The median duration of BRV exposure was 12 months (range: 1 day to 72 months). Overall BRV retention was 71.1%. While 56.1% of patients improved in terms of seizure frequency category (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly seizures), 23.1% did not improve on this measure and 20.8% deteriorated. In terms of seizure frequency, 21% of patients experienced a ≥50% reduction, with 7.0% of all patients becoming seizure-free. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported by 107 (36.9%) patients, but there were no serious AEs. The commonest AEs were sedation/fatigue (18.3%), mood changes (9.0%), and irritability/aggression (4.8%). There were no significant differences in drug retention, seizure frequency outcomes, or AEs between the LEV+ and LEV- subgroups, or between patients with generalized or focal epilepsies. Although 15.5% of patients in the LD+ group achieved a ≥50% reduction, this rate was lower than in the LD- group. This 'real-life' evaluation suggests that reductions in seizure frequency can be achieved with BRV in patients with highly refractory epilepsy. Brivaracetam may be a useful treatment option in patients who have previously failed to respond to or tolerate LEV, those with LD, or (off-label) those with generalized epilepsies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32179501
pii: S1525-5050(20)30142-6
doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.106967
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticonvulsants
0
Pyrrolidinones
0
brivaracetam
U863JGG2IA
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106967Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest UCB supported this investigator-led project by funding the salary costs of the researcher responsible for data collection. UCB had no influence on the data analysis or the preparation of this manuscript. MR has received speaker's fees from UCB, Eisai, and LivaNova.