Chiral twisting in a bacterial cytoskeletal polymer affects filament size and orientation.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 03 2020
16 03 2020
Historique:
received:
08
11
2019
accepted:
24
01
2020
entrez:
18
3
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In many rod-shaped bacteria, the actin homolog MreB directs cell-wall insertion and maintains cell shape, but it remains unclear how structural changes to MreB affect its organization in vivo. Here, we perform molecular dynamics simulations for Caulobacter crescentus MreB to extract mechanical parameters for inputs into a coarse-grained biophysical polymer model that successfully predicts MreB filament properties in vivo. Our analyses indicate that MreB double protofilaments can exhibit left-handed twisting that is dependent on the bound nucleotide and membrane binding; the degree of twisting correlates with the length and orientation of MreB filaments observed in vitro and in vivo. Our molecular dynamics simulations also suggest that membrane binding of MreB double protofilaments induces a stable membrane curvature of similar magnitude to that observed in vivo. Thus, our multiscale modeling correlates cytoskeletal filament size with conformational changes inferred from molecular dynamics simulations, providing a paradigm for connecting protein filament structure and mechanics to cellular organization and function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32179732
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14752-9
pii: 10.1038/s41467-020-14752-9
pmc: PMC7075873
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Proteins
0
Polymers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1408Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : DP2 OD006466
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM116961
Pays : United States
Références
Van Teeffelen, S. et al. The bacterial actin MreB rotates, and rotation depends on cell-wall assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 15822–15827 (2011).
pubmed: 21903929
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108999108
pmcid: 21903929
Adams, D. W. & Errington, J. Bacterial cell division: assembly, maintenance and disassembly of the Z ring. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 642–653 (2009).
pubmed: 19680248
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2198
pmcid: 19680248
Szwedziak, P., Wang, Q., Freund, S. M. & Löwe, J. FtsA forms actin‐like protofilaments. EMBO J. 31, 2249–2260 (2012).
pubmed: 22473211
pmcid: 3364754
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.76
Gayathri, P. et al. A bipolar spindle of antiparallel ParM filaments drives bacterial plasmid segregation. Science 338, 1334–1337 (2012).
pubmed: 23112295
pmcid: 3694215
doi: 10.1126/science.1229091
Van den Ent, F., Izoré, T., Bharat, T. A., Johnson, C. M. & Löwe, J. Bacterial actin MreB forms antiparallel double filaments. Elife 3, e02634 (2014).
pubmed: 24843005
pmcid: 4051119
doi: 10.7554/eLife.02634
Holtje, J. V. Growth of the stress-bearing and shape-maintaining murein sacculus of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 181–203 (1998).
pubmed: 9529891
pmcid: 98910
doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.1.181-203.1998
van den Ent, F., Amos, L. A. & Löwe, J. Prokaryotic origin of the actin cytoskeleton. Nature 413, 39–44 (2001).
pubmed: 11544518
doi: 10.1038/35092500
Ursell, T. S. et al. Rod-like bacterial shape is maintained by feedback between cell curvature and cytoskeletal localization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, E1025–E1034 (2014).
pubmed: 24550515
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317174111
Jones, L. J., Carballido-López, R. & Errington, J. Control of cell shape in bacteria: helical, actin-like filaments in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 104, 913–922 (2001).
pubmed: 11290328
doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00287-2
Wachi, M. et al. Mutant isolation and molecular cloning of mre genes, which determine cell shape, sensitivity to mecillinam, and amount of penicillin-binding proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 169, 4935–4940 (1987).
pubmed: 2822655
pmcid: 213889
doi: 10.1128/JB.169.11.4935-4940.1987
Bean, G. et al. A22 disrupts the bacterial actin cytoskeleton by directly binding and inducing a low-affinity state in MreB. Biochemistry 48, 4852–4857 (2009).
pubmed: 19382805
pmcid: 3951351
doi: 10.1021/bi900014d
Harris, L. K., Dye, N. A. & Theriot, J. A. A Caulobacter MreB mutant with irregular cell shape exhibits compensatory widening to maintain a preferred surface area to volume ratio. Mol. Microbiol. 94, 988–1005 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/mmi.12811
Monds, R. D. et al. Systematic perturbation of cytoskeletal function reveals a linear scaling relationship between cell geometry and fitness. Cell Rep. 9, 1528–1537 (2014).
pubmed: 25456141
pmcid: 6586469
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.040
Shi, H. et al. Deep phenotypic mapping of bacterial cytoskeletal mutants reveals physiological robustness to cell size. Curr. Biol. 27, 3419–3429.e3414 (2017).
pubmed: 29103935
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.065
pmcid: 29103935
Dye, N. A., Pincus, Z., Fisher, I. C., Shapiro, L. & Theriot, J. A. Mutations in the nucleotide binding pocket of MreB can alter cell curvature and polar morphology in Caulobacter. Mol. Microbiol. 81, 368–394 (2011).
pubmed: 21564339
pmcid: 3137890
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07698.x
Kawazura, T. et al. Exclusion of assembled MreB by anionic phospholipids at cell poles confers cell polarity for bidirectional growth. Mol. Microbiol. 104, 472–486 (2017).
pubmed: 28164388
doi: 10.1111/mmi.13639
pmcid: 28164388
Tropini, C. et al. Principles of bacterial cell-size determination revealed by cell-wall synthesis perturbations. Cell Rep. 9, 1520–1527 (2014).
pubmed: 25456140
pmcid: 4254626
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.027
Colavin, A., Hsin, J. & Huang, K. C. Effects of polymerization and nucleotide identity on the conformational dynamics of the bacterial actin homolog MreB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 3585–3590 (2014).
pubmed: 24550504
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317061111
pmcid: 24550504
Colavin, A., Shi, H. & Huang, K. C. RodZ modulates geometric localization of the bacterial actin MreB to regulate cell shape. Nat. Commun. 9, 1280 (2018).
pubmed: 29599448
pmcid: 5876373
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03633-x
Salje, J., van den Ent, F., de Boer, P. & Löwe, J. Direct membrane binding by bacterial actin MreB. Mol. Cell 43, 478–487 (2011).
pubmed: 21816350
pmcid: 3163269
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.008
Gitai, Z., Dye, N. A., Reisenauer, A., Wachi, M. & Shapiro, L. MreB actin-mediated segregation of a specific region of a bacterial chromosome. Cell 120, 329–341 (2005).
pubmed: 15707892
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.007
pmcid: 15707892
Awuni, Y., Jiang, S., Robinson, R. C. & Mu, Y. Exploring the A22-bacterial actin MreB interaction through molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 9867–9874 (2016).
pubmed: 27600765
doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b05199
pmcid: 27600765
Hussain, S. et al. MreB filaments align along greatest principal membrane curvature to orient cell wall synthesis. eLife 7, e32471 (2018).
pubmed: 29469806
pmcid: 5854468
doi: 10.7554/eLife.32471
Shiomi, D. et al. Mutations in cell elongation genes mreB, mrdA and mrdB suppress the shape defect of RodZ‐deficient cells. Mol. Microbiol. 87, 1029–1044 (2013).
pubmed: 23301723
pmcid: 3599482
doi: 10.1111/mmi.12148
Ent, VanDen, Johnson, F., Persons, C. M., De Boer, L. & Löwe, P. J. Bacterial actin MreB assembles in complex with cell shape protein RodZ. EMBO J. 29, 1081–1090 (2010).
pubmed: 20168300
pmcid: 2845281
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.9
Bendezú, F. O., Hale, C. A., Bernhardt, T. G. & De Boer, P. A. RodZ (YfgA) is required for proper assembly of the MreB actin cytoskeleton and cell shape in E. coli. EMBO J. 28, 193–204 (2009).
pubmed: 19078962
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.264
pmcid: 19078962
Schmidt, A. et al. The quantitative and condition-dependent Escherichia coli proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 104 (2016).
pubmed: 26641532
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3418
pmcid: 26641532
Deng, Y., Sun, M. & Shaevitz, J. W. Direct measurement of cell wall stress stiffening and turgor pressure in live bacterial cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 158101 (2011).
pubmed: 22107320
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.158101
pmcid: 22107320
Howard, J. Mechanics of motor proteins and the cytoskeleton. p182 (Sinauer Associates, 2001).
Quint, D. A., Gopinathan, A. & Grason, G. M. Shape selection of surface-bound helical filaments: biopolymers on curved membranes. Biophys. J. 111, 1575–1585 (2016).
pubmed: 27705779
pmcid: 5052453
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.017
Ouzounov, N. et al. MreB orientation correlates with cell diameter in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 111, 1035–1043 (2016).
pubmed: 27602731
pmcid: 5018124
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.07.017
Jauffred, L., Vejborg, R. M., Korolev, K. S., Brown, S. & Oddershede, L. B. Chirality in microbial biofilms is mediated by close interactions between the cell surface and the substratum. ISME J. 11, 1688 (2017).
pubmed: 28362723
pmcid: 5584475
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.19
Wang, S., Furchtgott, L., Huang, K. C. & Shaevitz, J. W. Helical insertion of peptidoglycan produces chiral ordering of the bacterial cell wall. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E595–E604 (2012).
pubmed: 22343529
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117132109
pmcid: 22343529
Leaver-Fay, A. et al. ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods in enzymology 487, 545–574 (2011).
pubmed: 21187238
pmcid: 4083816
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6
Wang, S. & Wingreen, N. S. Cell shape can mediate the spatial organization of the bacterial cytoskeleton. Biophys. J. 104, 541–552 (2013).
pubmed: 23442905
pmcid: 3566457
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.027
de Prado Salas, P. G. et al. Torsion and curvature of FtsZ filaments. Soft Matter 10, 1977–1986 (2014).
doi: 10.1039/c3sm52516c
Ng, N., Shi, H., Colavin, A. & Huang, K. C. Conservation of conformational dynamics across prokaryotic actins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006683 (2019).
pubmed: 30951524
pmcid: 6450608
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006683
Polka, J. K., Kollman, J. M., Agard, D. A. & Mullins, R. D. The structure and assembly dynamics of plasmid actin AlfA imply a novel mechanism of DNA segregation. J. Bacteriol. 191, 6219–6230 (2009).
pubmed: 19666709
pmcid: 2753045
doi: 10.1128/JB.00676-09
Wan, L. Q. et al. Micropatterned mammalian cells exhibit phenotype-specific left-right asymmetry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 12295–12300 (2011).
pubmed: 21709270
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103834108
Pereira, A. R. et al. FtsZ-dependent elongation of a coccoid bacterium. MBio 7, e00908–e00916 (2016).
pubmed: 27601570
pmcid: 5013293
doi: 10.1128/mBio.00908-16
Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
pubmed: 16222654
pmcid: 16222654
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20289
Shaw, D. E. et al. in Proc. International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. 41–53 (IEEE Press).
Best, R. B. et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone phi, psi and side-chain chi(1) and chi(2) dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3257–3273 (2012).
pubmed: 23341755
pmcid: 3549273
doi: 10.1021/ct300400x
Mackerell, A. D. Jr., Feig, M. & Brooks, C. L. 3rd Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1400–1415 (2004).
pubmed: 15185334
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20065
pmcid: 15185334
Jorgensen, J. H., Johnson, J. E., Alexander, G. A., Paxson, R. & Alderson, G. L. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 79, 683–687 (1983).
pubmed: 6342361
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/79.6.683
pmcid: 6342361
Tuckerman, M., Berne, B. J. & Martyna, G. J. Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1990–2001 (1992).
doi: 10.1063/1.463137
Brünger, A., Brooks, C. L. & Karplus, M. Stochastic boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations of ST2 water. Chem. Phys. Lett. 105, 495–500 (1984).
doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(84)80098-6
Feller, S. E., Zhang, Y., Pastor, R. W. & Brooks, B. R. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4613–4621 (1995).
doi: 10.1063/1.470648
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996). 27-28.
pubmed: 8744570
doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
pmcid: 8744570
Hsin, J., Gopinathan, A. & Huang, K. C. Nucleotide-dependent conformations of FtsZ dimers and force generation observed through molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9432–9437 (2012).
pubmed: 22647609
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120761109
pmcid: 22647609
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
pmcid: 15264254
Zoete, V., Cuendet, M. A., Grosdidier, A. & Michielin, O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2359–2368 (2011).
pubmed: 21541964
doi: 10.1002/jcc.21816
pmcid: 21541964
Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 86, 2.9. 1–2.9. 37 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/cpps.20
Ursell, T. et al. Rapid, precise quantification of bacterial cellular dimensions across a genomic-scale knockout library. BMC Biol. 15, 17 (2017).
pubmed: 28222723
pmcid: 5320674
doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0348-8
Sliusarenko, O., Heinritz, J., Emonet, T. & Jacobs‐Wagner, C. High‐throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio‐temporal dynamics. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 612–627 (2011).
pubmed: 21414037
pmcid: 3090749
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07579.x