Chiral twisting in a bacterial cytoskeletal polymer affects filament size and orientation.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 03 2020
Historique:
received: 08 11 2019
accepted: 24 01 2020
entrez: 18 3 2020
pubmed: 18 3 2020
medline: 28 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In many rod-shaped bacteria, the actin homolog MreB directs cell-wall insertion and maintains cell shape, but it remains unclear how structural changes to MreB affect its organization in vivo. Here, we perform molecular dynamics simulations for Caulobacter crescentus MreB to extract mechanical parameters for inputs into a coarse-grained biophysical polymer model that successfully predicts MreB filament properties in vivo. Our analyses indicate that MreB double protofilaments can exhibit left-handed twisting that is dependent on the bound nucleotide and membrane binding; the degree of twisting correlates with the length and orientation of MreB filaments observed in vitro and in vivo. Our molecular dynamics simulations also suggest that membrane binding of MreB double protofilaments induces a stable membrane curvature of similar magnitude to that observed in vivo. Thus, our multiscale modeling correlates cytoskeletal filament size with conformational changes inferred from molecular dynamics simulations, providing a paradigm for connecting protein filament structure and mechanics to cellular organization and function.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32179732
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14752-9
pii: 10.1038/s41467-020-14752-9
pmc: PMC7075873
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bacterial Proteins 0
Polymers 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1408

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : DP2 OD006466
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM116961
Pays : United States

Références

Van Teeffelen, S. et al. The bacterial actin MreB rotates, and rotation depends on cell-wall assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 15822–15827 (2011).
pubmed: 21903929 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108999108 pmcid: 21903929
Adams, D. W. & Errington, J. Bacterial cell division: assembly, maintenance and disassembly of the Z ring. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 642–653 (2009).
pubmed: 19680248 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2198 pmcid: 19680248
Szwedziak, P., Wang, Q., Freund, S. M. & Löwe, J. FtsA forms actin‐like protofilaments. EMBO J. 31, 2249–2260 (2012).
pubmed: 22473211 pmcid: 3364754 doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.76
Gayathri, P. et al. A bipolar spindle of antiparallel ParM filaments drives bacterial plasmid segregation. Science 338, 1334–1337 (2012).
pubmed: 23112295 pmcid: 3694215 doi: 10.1126/science.1229091
Van den Ent, F., Izoré, T., Bharat, T. A., Johnson, C. M. & Löwe, J. Bacterial actin MreB forms antiparallel double filaments. Elife 3, e02634 (2014).
pubmed: 24843005 pmcid: 4051119 doi: 10.7554/eLife.02634
Holtje, J. V. Growth of the stress-bearing and shape-maintaining murein sacculus of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 181–203 (1998).
pubmed: 9529891 pmcid: 98910 doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.1.181-203.1998
van den Ent, F., Amos, L. A. & Löwe, J. Prokaryotic origin of the actin cytoskeleton. Nature 413, 39–44 (2001).
pubmed: 11544518 doi: 10.1038/35092500
Ursell, T. S. et al. Rod-like bacterial shape is maintained by feedback between cell curvature and cytoskeletal localization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, E1025–E1034 (2014).
pubmed: 24550515 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317174111
Jones, L. J., Carballido-López, R. & Errington, J. Control of cell shape in bacteria: helical, actin-like filaments in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 104, 913–922 (2001).
pubmed: 11290328 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00287-2
Wachi, M. et al. Mutant isolation and molecular cloning of mre genes, which determine cell shape, sensitivity to mecillinam, and amount of penicillin-binding proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 169, 4935–4940 (1987).
pubmed: 2822655 pmcid: 213889 doi: 10.1128/JB.169.11.4935-4940.1987
Bean, G. et al. A22 disrupts the bacterial actin cytoskeleton by directly binding and inducing a low-affinity state in MreB. Biochemistry 48, 4852–4857 (2009).
pubmed: 19382805 pmcid: 3951351 doi: 10.1021/bi900014d
Harris, L. K., Dye, N. A. & Theriot, J. A. A Caulobacter MreB mutant with irregular cell shape exhibits compensatory widening to maintain a preferred surface area to volume ratio. Mol. Microbiol. 94, 988–1005 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/mmi.12811
Monds, R. D. et al. Systematic perturbation of cytoskeletal function reveals a linear scaling relationship between cell geometry and fitness. Cell Rep. 9, 1528–1537 (2014).
pubmed: 25456141 pmcid: 6586469 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.040
Shi, H. et al. Deep phenotypic mapping of bacterial cytoskeletal mutants reveals physiological robustness to cell size. Curr. Biol. 27, 3419–3429.e3414 (2017).
pubmed: 29103935 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.065 pmcid: 29103935
Dye, N. A., Pincus, Z., Fisher, I. C., Shapiro, L. & Theriot, J. A. Mutations in the nucleotide binding pocket of MreB can alter cell curvature and polar morphology in Caulobacter. Mol. Microbiol. 81, 368–394 (2011).
pubmed: 21564339 pmcid: 3137890 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07698.x
Kawazura, T. et al. Exclusion of assembled MreB by anionic phospholipids at cell poles confers cell polarity for bidirectional growth. Mol. Microbiol. 104, 472–486 (2017).
pubmed: 28164388 doi: 10.1111/mmi.13639 pmcid: 28164388
Tropini, C. et al. Principles of bacterial cell-size determination revealed by cell-wall synthesis perturbations. Cell Rep. 9, 1520–1527 (2014).
pubmed: 25456140 pmcid: 4254626 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.027
Colavin, A., Hsin, J. & Huang, K. C. Effects of polymerization and nucleotide identity on the conformational dynamics of the bacterial actin homolog MreB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 3585–3590 (2014).
pubmed: 24550504 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317061111 pmcid: 24550504
Colavin, A., Shi, H. & Huang, K. C. RodZ modulates geometric localization of the bacterial actin MreB to regulate cell shape. Nat. Commun. 9, 1280 (2018).
pubmed: 29599448 pmcid: 5876373 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03633-x
Salje, J., van den Ent, F., de Boer, P. & Löwe, J. Direct membrane binding by bacterial actin MreB. Mol. Cell 43, 478–487 (2011).
pubmed: 21816350 pmcid: 3163269 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.008
Gitai, Z., Dye, N. A., Reisenauer, A., Wachi, M. & Shapiro, L. MreB actin-mediated segregation of a specific region of a bacterial chromosome. Cell 120, 329–341 (2005).
pubmed: 15707892 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.007 pmcid: 15707892
Awuni, Y., Jiang, S., Robinson, R. C. & Mu, Y. Exploring the A22-bacterial actin MreB interaction through molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 9867–9874 (2016).
pubmed: 27600765 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b05199 pmcid: 27600765
Hussain, S. et al. MreB filaments align along greatest principal membrane curvature to orient cell wall synthesis. eLife 7, e32471 (2018).
pubmed: 29469806 pmcid: 5854468 doi: 10.7554/eLife.32471
Shiomi, D. et al. Mutations in cell elongation genes mreB, mrdA and mrdB suppress the shape defect of RodZ‐deficient cells. Mol. Microbiol. 87, 1029–1044 (2013).
pubmed: 23301723 pmcid: 3599482 doi: 10.1111/mmi.12148
Ent, VanDen, Johnson, F., Persons, C. M., De Boer, L. & Löwe, P. J. Bacterial actin MreB assembles in complex with cell shape protein RodZ. EMBO J. 29, 1081–1090 (2010).
pubmed: 20168300 pmcid: 2845281 doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.9
Bendezú, F. O., Hale, C. A., Bernhardt, T. G. & De Boer, P. A. RodZ (YfgA) is required for proper assembly of the MreB actin cytoskeleton and cell shape in E. coli. EMBO J. 28, 193–204 (2009).
pubmed: 19078962 doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.264 pmcid: 19078962
Schmidt, A. et al. The quantitative and condition-dependent Escherichia coli proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 104 (2016).
pubmed: 26641532 doi: 10.1038/nbt.3418 pmcid: 26641532
Deng, Y., Sun, M. & Shaevitz, J. W. Direct measurement of cell wall stress stiffening and turgor pressure in live bacterial cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 158101 (2011).
pubmed: 22107320 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.158101 pmcid: 22107320
Howard, J. Mechanics of motor proteins and the cytoskeleton. p182 (Sinauer Associates, 2001).
Quint, D. A., Gopinathan, A. & Grason, G. M. Shape selection of surface-bound helical filaments: biopolymers on curved membranes. Biophys. J. 111, 1575–1585 (2016).
pubmed: 27705779 pmcid: 5052453 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.017
Ouzounov, N. et al. MreB orientation correlates with cell diameter in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 111, 1035–1043 (2016).
pubmed: 27602731 pmcid: 5018124 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.07.017
Jauffred, L., Vejborg, R. M., Korolev, K. S., Brown, S. & Oddershede, L. B. Chirality in microbial biofilms is mediated by close interactions between the cell surface and the substratum. ISME J. 11, 1688 (2017).
pubmed: 28362723 pmcid: 5584475 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.19
Wang, S., Furchtgott, L., Huang, K. C. & Shaevitz, J. W. Helical insertion of peptidoglycan produces chiral ordering of the bacterial cell wall. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E595–E604 (2012).
pubmed: 22343529 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117132109 pmcid: 22343529
Leaver-Fay, A. et al. ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods in enzymology 487, 545–574 (2011).
pubmed: 21187238 pmcid: 4083816 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381270-4.00019-6
Wang, S. & Wingreen, N. S. Cell shape can mediate the spatial organization of the bacterial cytoskeleton. Biophys. J. 104, 541–552 (2013).
pubmed: 23442905 pmcid: 3566457 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.027
de Prado Salas, P. G. et al. Torsion and curvature of FtsZ filaments. Soft Matter 10, 1977–1986 (2014).
doi: 10.1039/c3sm52516c
Ng, N., Shi, H., Colavin, A. & Huang, K. C. Conservation of conformational dynamics across prokaryotic actins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006683 (2019).
pubmed: 30951524 pmcid: 6450608 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006683
Polka, J. K., Kollman, J. M., Agard, D. A. & Mullins, R. D. The structure and assembly dynamics of plasmid actin AlfA imply a novel mechanism of DNA segregation. J. Bacteriol. 191, 6219–6230 (2009).
pubmed: 19666709 pmcid: 2753045 doi: 10.1128/JB.00676-09
Wan, L. Q. et al. Micropatterned mammalian cells exhibit phenotype-specific left-right asymmetry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 12295–12300 (2011).
pubmed: 21709270 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103834108
Pereira, A. R. et al. FtsZ-dependent elongation of a coccoid bacterium. MBio 7, e00908–e00916 (2016).
pubmed: 27601570 pmcid: 5013293 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00908-16
Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
pubmed: 16222654 pmcid: 16222654 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20289
Shaw, D. E. et al. in Proc. International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. 41–53 (IEEE Press).
Best, R. B. et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone phi, psi and side-chain chi(1) and chi(2) dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3257–3273 (2012).
pubmed: 23341755 pmcid: 3549273 doi: 10.1021/ct300400x
Mackerell, A. D. Jr., Feig, M. & Brooks, C. L. 3rd Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1400–1415 (2004).
pubmed: 15185334 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20065 pmcid: 15185334
Jorgensen, J. H., Johnson, J. E., Alexander, G. A., Paxson, R. & Alderson, G. L. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 79, 683–687 (1983).
pubmed: 6342361 doi: 10.1093/ajcp/79.6.683 pmcid: 6342361
Tuckerman, M., Berne, B. J. & Martyna, G. J. Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1990–2001 (1992).
doi: 10.1063/1.463137
Brünger, A., Brooks, C. L. & Karplus, M. Stochastic boundary conditions for molecular dynamics simulations of ST2 water. Chem. Phys. Lett. 105, 495–500 (1984).
doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(84)80098-6
Feller, S. E., Zhang, Y., Pastor, R. W. & Brooks, B. R. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4613–4621 (1995).
doi: 10.1063/1.470648
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996). 27-28.
pubmed: 8744570 doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 pmcid: 8744570
Hsin, J., Gopinathan, A. & Huang, K. C. Nucleotide-dependent conformations of FtsZ dimers and force generation observed through molecular dynamics simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9432–9437 (2012).
pubmed: 22647609 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120761109 pmcid: 22647609
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084 pmcid: 15264254
Zoete, V., Cuendet, M. A., Grosdidier, A. & Michielin, O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2359–2368 (2011).
pubmed: 21541964 doi: 10.1002/jcc.21816 pmcid: 21541964
Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 86, 2.9. 1–2.9. 37 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/cpps.20
Ursell, T. et al. Rapid, precise quantification of bacterial cellular dimensions across a genomic-scale knockout library. BMC Biol. 15, 17 (2017).
pubmed: 28222723 pmcid: 5320674 doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0348-8
Sliusarenko, O., Heinritz, J., Emonet, T. & Jacobs‐Wagner, C. High‐throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio‐temporal dynamics. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 612–627 (2011).
pubmed: 21414037 pmcid: 3090749 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07579.x

Auteurs

Handuo Shi (H)

Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

David A Quint (DA)

Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Department of Physics, University of California at Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
NSF-CREST: Center for Cellular and Biomolecular Machines, University of California at Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.

Gregory M Grason (GM)

Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.

Ajay Gopinathan (A)

Department of Physics, University of California at Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
NSF-CREST: Center for Cellular and Biomolecular Machines, University of California at Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.

Kerwyn Casey Huang (KC)

Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. kchuang@stanford.edu.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. kchuang@stanford.edu.
Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. kchuang@stanford.edu.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Semiconductors Photosynthesis Polymers Carbon Dioxide Bacteria
Humans Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Awards and Prizes Biomechanical Phenomena
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans

Classifications MeSH