Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the management of post-cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures.
Bilioenteric anastomosis
Hepaticoduodenostomy
Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy
Post-cholecystectomy benign biliary stricture
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
23
12
2019
accepted:
02
03
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
21
7
2021
entrez:
18
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical management by a bilioenteric anastomosis is the standard for the repair of post-cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures (BBS). This is traditionally done as an open operation. There are a few reports describing the procedure by a laparoscopic technique. The aim of the present study was to describe our experience of laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis [Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (LRYHJ)/laparoscopic hepaticoduodenostomy (LHD)] in the management of post-cholecystectomy BBS and compare the outcomes with our patients operated by the open approach. Retrospective analysis of prospective data of post-cholecystectomy BBS patients treated by laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis. The outcomes were compared with patients who underwent an open repair. Between January 2016 and February 2019, 63 patients underwent surgery for post-cholecystectomy BBS. Twenty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis (LRYHJ-13, LHD-16) were compared with 34 patients who underwent an open repair. The median age (40 vs 39) years, type of index surgery [laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 vs 15), laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy (10 vs 16), and open cholecystectomy (6 vs 3)], type of injury low stricture (7 vs 5) and high stricture (22 vs 29), preoperative biliary fistula (23 vs 30), and time from injury to repair (6 vs 7 months) were similar in the 2 groups. The median duration of surgery was also similar (210 vs 200 min, p = 0.937); however, the median intraoperative blood loss (50 mL vs 200 mL, p = 0.001), time to resume oral diet (2 vs 4 days p = 0.023),** and median duration of postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.001) were significantly less in the laparoscopy group. Overall morbidity rate (within 30 days post-surgery) was significantly higher in the open repair group (38% vs 20%). In a subgroup analysis of the laparoscopic repair group, the operative time in patients who underwent an LHD was significantly less than LRYHJ (190 vs 230 min, p = 0.034). The other parameters like the mean intraoperative blood loss, time to initiate oral diet, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative bile leak were similar. Patients undergoing open repair had a median follow-up of 26 months with two developing anastomotic stenosis and those undergoing laparoscopic repair had a median follow-up for 9 months with one developing anastomotic stenosis. Laparoscopic surgery for post-cholecystectomy BBS with an LRYHJ or LHD is feasible and safe and compares favourably with the open approach.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Surgical management by a bilioenteric anastomosis is the standard for the repair of post-cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures (BBS). This is traditionally done as an open operation. There are a few reports describing the procedure by a laparoscopic technique. The aim of the present study was to describe our experience of laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis [Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (LRYHJ)/laparoscopic hepaticoduodenostomy (LHD)] in the management of post-cholecystectomy BBS and compare the outcomes with our patients operated by the open approach.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of prospective data of post-cholecystectomy BBS patients treated by laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis. The outcomes were compared with patients who underwent an open repair.
RESULTS
Between January 2016 and February 2019, 63 patients underwent surgery for post-cholecystectomy BBS. Twenty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic bilio-enteric anastomosis (LRYHJ-13, LHD-16) were compared with 34 patients who underwent an open repair. The median age (40 vs 39) years, type of index surgery [laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 vs 15), laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy (10 vs 16), and open cholecystectomy (6 vs 3)], type of injury low stricture (7 vs 5) and high stricture (22 vs 29), preoperative biliary fistula (23 vs 30), and time from injury to repair (6 vs 7 months) were similar in the 2 groups. The median duration of surgery was also similar (210 vs 200 min, p = 0.937); however, the median intraoperative blood loss (50 mL vs 200 mL, p = 0.001), time to resume oral diet (2 vs 4 days p = 0.023),** and median duration of postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 8 days, p = 0.001) were significantly less in the laparoscopy group. Overall morbidity rate (within 30 days post-surgery) was significantly higher in the open repair group (38% vs 20%). In a subgroup analysis of the laparoscopic repair group, the operative time in patients who underwent an LHD was significantly less than LRYHJ (190 vs 230 min, p = 0.034). The other parameters like the mean intraoperative blood loss, time to initiate oral diet, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative bile leak were similar. Patients undergoing open repair had a median follow-up of 26 months with two developing anastomotic stenosis and those undergoing laparoscopic repair had a median follow-up for 9 months with one developing anastomotic stenosis.
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic surgery for post-cholecystectomy BBS with an LRYHJ or LHD is feasible and safe and compares favourably with the open approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32179999
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07496-6
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07496-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1254-1263Références
Shimada H, Endo I, Shimada K, Matsuyama R, Kobayashi N, Kubota K (2012) The current diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary stricture. Surg Today 42:1143–1153
doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0333-3
Kaman L, Sanyal S, Behera A, Singh R, Katariya RN (2006) Comparison of major bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 76(9):788–791
doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03868.x
Carroll BJ, Birth M, Phillips EH (1998) Common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that result in litigation. Surg Endosc 12(4):310–313
doi: 10.1007/s004649900660
Visrodia KH, Tabibian JH, Baron TH (2015) Endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:1003–1013
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i11.1003
Costamagna G, Pandolfi M, Mutignani M, Spada C, Perri V (2001) Long-term results of endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct strictures with increasing numbers of stents. Gastrointest Endosc 54:162–168
doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.116876
Sikora SS (2012) Postcholecystectomy benign biliary stricture: surgery is the gold standard. J Dig Endosc 3(Suppl S1):36–39
Agha R, Muir G (2003) Does laparoscopic surgery spell the end of the open surgeon? J R Soc Med 96(11):544–546
doi: 10.1177/014107680309601107
Bismuth H, Majno PE (2001) Biliary strictures: classification based on the principles of surgical treatment. World J Surg 25:1241–1244
doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0102-8
Cho JY, Baron TH, Carr-Locke DL, Chapman WC, Costamagna G, de Santibanes E et al (2018) Proposed standards for reporting outcomes of treating biliary injuries. HPB 20:370–378
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.10.012
Hepp J, Couinaud C (1956) L'abord et l'utilisation du canal hépatique gauche dans les réparations de la voiebiliaireprincipale. Presse Med 64(41):947–948
pubmed: 13335941
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Mercado MA, Chan C, Orozco H, Tielve M, Hinojosa CA (2003) Acute bile duct injury. The need for a high repair. Surg Endosc 17:1351–1355
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8705-1
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125
pubmed: 8000648
He Z, Fu Z, Wu Y, Gong J, Zhang W (2016) Surgical management of benign biliary strictures: a 20-year experience. Int J Clin Exp Med 9(2):4630–4634
Cuendis-Velázquez A, Morales-Chávez C, Aguirre-Olmedo I, Torres-Ruiz F, Rojano-Rodríguez M, Fernández-Álvarez L et al (2016) Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct injury. Surg Endosc 30:876–882
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4282-y
Chowbey PK, Soni V, Sharma A, Khullar R, Baijal M (2005) Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for biliary strictures an experience of 10 patients. Surg Endosc 19:273–279
doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8288-5
Cuendis-Velázquez A, Trejo-Ávila M, Bada-Yllán O et al (2019) New era of bile duct repair: robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 23(3):451–459
doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4018-0
Marino MV, Mirabella A, Guarrasi D, Lupo M, Komorowski AL (2019) Robotic-assisted repair of iatrogenic common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Int J Med Robot 18:e1992
Dokmak S, Amharar N, Aussilhou B et al (2017) Laparoscopic Repair of Post- cholecystectomy Bile Duct Injury: An Advance in Surgical Management. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1368
doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3400-7