Challenges and lessons learned from the Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Database study.
Challenges
Echocardiography
paediatric cardiology
Journal
Cardiology in the young
ISSN: 1467-1107
Titre abrégé: Cardiol Young
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9200019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
14
1
2021
entrez:
18
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Database Study had unanticipated challenges. We sought to describe these challenges and lessons learned to improve the design of future studies. Challenges were divided into three categories: enrolment, echocardiographic imaging, and protocol violations. Memoranda, Core Lab reports, and adjudication logs were reviewed. A centre-level questionnaire provided information regarding local processes for data collection. Descriptive statistics were used, and chi-square tests determined differences in imaging quality. For the 19 participating centres, challenges with enrolment included variations in Institutional Review Board definitions of "retrospective" eligibility, overestimation of non-White participants, centre categorisation of Hispanic participants that differed from National Institutes of Health definitions, and exclusion of potential participants due to missing demographic data. Institutional Review Board amendments resolved many of these challenges. There was an unanticipated burden imposed on centres due to high numbers of echocardiograms that were reviewed but failed to meet submission criteria. Additionally, image transfer software malfunctions delayed Core Lab image review and feedback. Between the early and late study periods, the proportion of unacceptable echocardiograms submitted to the Core Lab decreased (14 versus 7%, p < 0.01). Most protocol violations were from eligibility violations and inadvertent protected health information disclosure (overall 2.5%). Adjudication committee reviews led to protocol changes. Numerous challenges encountered during the Normal Echocardiogram Database Study prolonged study enrolment. The retrospective design and flaws in image transfer software were key impediments to study completion and should be considered when designing future studies collecting echocardiographic images as a primary outcome.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Database Study had unanticipated challenges. We sought to describe these challenges and lessons learned to improve the design of future studies.
METHODS
METHODS
Challenges were divided into three categories: enrolment, echocardiographic imaging, and protocol violations. Memoranda, Core Lab reports, and adjudication logs were reviewed. A centre-level questionnaire provided information regarding local processes for data collection. Descriptive statistics were used, and chi-square tests determined differences in imaging quality.
RESULTS
RESULTS
For the 19 participating centres, challenges with enrolment included variations in Institutional Review Board definitions of "retrospective" eligibility, overestimation of non-White participants, centre categorisation of Hispanic participants that differed from National Institutes of Health definitions, and exclusion of potential participants due to missing demographic data. Institutional Review Board amendments resolved many of these challenges. There was an unanticipated burden imposed on centres due to high numbers of echocardiograms that were reviewed but failed to meet submission criteria. Additionally, image transfer software malfunctions delayed Core Lab image review and feedback. Between the early and late study periods, the proportion of unacceptable echocardiograms submitted to the Core Lab decreased (14 versus 7%, p < 0.01). Most protocol violations were from eligibility violations and inadvertent protected health information disclosure (overall 2.5%). Adjudication committee reviews led to protocol changes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Numerous challenges encountered during the Normal Echocardiogram Database Study prolonged study enrolment. The retrospective design and flaws in image transfer software were key impediments to study completion and should be considered when designing future studies collecting echocardiographic images as a primary outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32180543
pii: S1047951120000438
doi: 10.1017/S1047951120000438
pmc: PMC7255408
mid: NIHMS1578501
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
456-461Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HL135646
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL133447
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HL135685
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U10 HL109743
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U24 HL135691
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U10 HL068270
Pays : United States
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):662-6
pubmed: 19841324
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 May;23(5):465-95; quiz 576-7
pubmed: 20451803
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54999
pubmed: 23383026
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;10(11):
pubmed: 29138232