Positive Psychological Micro-Interventions to Improve the Work-Family Interface: Use Your Resources and Count Your Blessings.

cognitive appraisal micro-interventions positive psychology work–family conflict work–family enrichment

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 04 11 2019
accepted: 05 02 2020
entrez: 18 3 2020
pubmed: 18 3 2020
medline: 18 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study is designed to test the effectiveness of two positive psychological micro-interventions ("use your resources" and "count your blessings") aimed at improving the combination of work and family roles. Based on the Transactional Model of Stress (TMS), the Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory and the Work-Home Resources (WH-R) Model, it was expected that the interventions would result in a more positive cognitive appraisal of combining both roles as well as in less work-to-family and family-to-work conflict and more work-to-family and family-to-work enrichment. The hypotheses were tested in a field experiment with three conditions and three measurement waves. In total, 218 working mothers participated in the study. The "use your resources" intervention appeared effective in sorting positive effects on the work-family outcome variables. Participating in the "count your blessing" micro-intervention did not result in a better (appraisal of the) combination of work and family roles. Moreover, for generating positive effects it was important that the participants performed the exercises on a regular basis: the more days women performed the exercise, the stronger the effects. The implications of our findings for future interventions to improve work-family role combining are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32180751
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00275
pmc: PMC7059610
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

275

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Peeters, van Steenbergen and Ybema.

Références

J Psychol. 2014 Jan-Feb;148(1):37-60
pubmed: 24617270
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 08;13:119
pubmed: 23390882
Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24
pubmed: 2648906
Emotion. 2011 Apr;11(2):391-402
pubmed: 21500907
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Apr;16(2):151-69
pubmed: 21280939
Am Psychol. 2012 Oct;67(7):545-56
pubmed: 22506688
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):278-308
pubmed: 10784291
Am Psychol. 2005 Jul-Aug;60(5):410-21
pubmed: 16045394
J Clin Psychol. 2009 May;65(5):467-87
pubmed: 19301241
J Occup Health Psychol. 2007 Jul;12(3):279-300
pubmed: 17638494
Res Nurs Health. 1998 Feb;21(1):73-82
pubmed: 9472239
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jan;96(1):134-50
pubmed: 20853943
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 May;50(5):992-1003
pubmed: 3712234
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Apr;19(2):182-94
pubmed: 24730427

Auteurs

Maria C W Peeters (MCW)

Department of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Elianne F van Steenbergen (EF)

Department of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Jan Fekke Ybema (JF)

Department of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH