Parenchyma Abundance in Wood of Evergreen Trees Varies Independently of Nutrients.
hydraulic traits
plant adaptation strategy
plant functional traits
soil phosphorus
tissue fractions
wood anatomy
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
03
2019
accepted:
21
01
2020
entrez:
18
3
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
18
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The abundance of living cells in wood-mainly as interconnected axial and ray parenchyma networks-varies widely between species. However, the functional significance of this variation and its role in plant ecological strategies is poorly understood, as is the extent to which different parenchyma fractions are favored in relation to soil nutrients and hydraulic functions. We analyzed wood tissue fractions of 16 Australian angiosperm species sampled from two nearby areas with similar climate but very different soil nutrient profiles and investigated structure-function links with soil and tissue nutrient concentrations and other plant traits. We expected the variation in parenchyma fractions to influence nutrient concentrations in wood xylem, and to find species with lower parenchyma fractions and accordingly lower nutrient requirements on lower-nutrient soils. Surprisingly, both axial and ray parenchyma fractions were mostly unrelated to tissue and soil nutrient concentrations, except for nitrogen concentration in stem sapwood. Species from low nutrient soils showed higher fractional P translocation from both leaves and sapwood, but little patterning with respect to tissue nitrogen. While species from high and low nutrient soils clearly clustered along the soil-fertility axis, their tissue composition varied independently from plant functional traits related to construction costs and hydraulic anatomy. Our findings imply that there is considerable variation among species in the nutrient concentrations within different parenchyma tissues. The anatomical composition of wood tissue seems unrelated to plant nutrient requirements. Even though xylem parenchyma is involved in metabolic functions such as nutrient translocation and storage, parenchyma abundance on its own does not directly explain variation in these functions, even in co-occurring species. While parenchyma is highly abundant in wood of angiosperm trees, we are still lacking a convincing ecological interpretation of its variability and role in whole-tree nutrient budgets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32180778
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00086
pmc: PMC7045414
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
86Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Kotowska, Wright and Westoby.
Références
Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2015 Feb 1;24(2):147-156
pubmed: 25983656
Am J Bot. 2018 Feb;105(2):151-160
pubmed: 29578292
Ann Bot. 2013 Mar;111(3):445-54
pubmed: 23293017
J Exp Bot. 2014 Apr;65(7):1829-48
pubmed: 24453225
Tree Physiol. 2004 Jan;24(1):99-105
pubmed: 14652219
New Phytol. 2013 Mar;197(4):1204-13
pubmed: 23278439
New Phytol. 2014 Nov;204(3):484-95
pubmed: 25046797
Plant Physiol. 2009 Nov;151(3):1646-57
pubmed: 19755536
Front Plant Sci. 2019 May 31;10:664
pubmed: 31214212
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Dec;34(12):2060-70
pubmed: 21819412
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Nov;9(11):548-55
pubmed: 15501180
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Aug;30(8):934-43
pubmed: 17617821
Ecol Lett. 2014 Aug;17(8):988-97
pubmed: 24847972
Ecol Lett. 2008 Oct;11(10):1065-71
pubmed: 18627410
Plant Physiol. 2011 Jul;156(3):997-1005
pubmed: 21571668
Am J Bot. 2016 Apr;103(4):603-12
pubmed: 26993972
Ann Bot. 2013 Sep;112(5):927-35
pubmed: 23904446
Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;173(2):1177-1196
pubmed: 27927981
New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):439-50
pubmed: 20158616
Plant Physiol. 1995 Jul;108(3):913-918
pubmed: 12228516
Oecologia. 1992 Apr;90(1):80-87
pubmed: 28312274
Am J Bot. 2009 Aug;96(8):1388-98
pubmed: 21628286
New Phytol. 2012 Jul;195(2):306-20
pubmed: 22691045
Tree Physiol. 2000 Oct;20(16):1105-12
pubmed: 11269962
Planta. 2001 Sep;213(5):811-23
pubmed: 11678287
Plant Sci. 2012 Oct;195:48-53
pubmed: 22920998
Tree Physiol. 2017 Nov 1;37(11):1493-1502
pubmed: 28575521
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Jan;41(1):245-260
pubmed: 29047119
New Phytol. 2013 Apr;198(2):486-95
pubmed: 23316689
New Phytol. 2016 Jul;211(2):440-54
pubmed: 26922861
Tree Physiol. 2001 Jan;21(1):9-17
pubmed: 11260819
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Feb;23(2):95-103
pubmed: 18191280
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0124892
pubmed: 25906320
Ecol Appl. 2010 Jan;20(1):5-15
pubmed: 20349827
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2010 Mar;12(2):259-67
pubmed: 20398233
Ann Bot. 2004 Jun;93(6):671-80
pubmed: 15072979
Tree Physiol. 2015 Jul;35(7):706-22
pubmed: 26163488
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Apr 24;4:108
pubmed: 23630539
New Phytol. 2016 Mar;209(4):1553-65
pubmed: 26551018
Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Dec;29(12):2153-67
pubmed: 17081249
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Jun;40(6):858-871
pubmed: 27628165
Plant Physiol. 1938 Oct;13(4):791-814
pubmed: 16653526