Let's talk about pain catastrophizing measures: an item content analysis.

Catastrophizing Content validity Pain Questionnaires Validity Worrying

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 25 04 2019
accepted: 27 01 2020
entrez: 18 3 2020
pubmed: 18 3 2020
medline: 18 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Concerns have been raised about whether self-report measures of pain catastrophizing reflect the construct as defined in the cognitive-behavioral literature. We investigated the content of these self-report measures; that is, whether items assess the construct 'pain catastrophizing' and not other theoretical constructs (i.e., related constructs or pain outcomes) using the discriminant content validity method. Items ( Data were analyzed using Bayesian hierarchical models. The results revealed that the items from pain-related worrying, vigilance, pain severity, distress, and disability questionnaires were distinctively related to their respective constructs. This was not observed for the items from the pain catastrophizing questionnaires. The content of the pain catastrophizing measures was equally well, or even better, captured by pain-related worrying or pain-related distress. Based upon current findings, a recommendation may be to develop a novel pain catastrophizing questionnaire. However, we argue that pain catastrophizing cannot be assessed by self-report questionnaires. Pain catastrophizing requires contextual information, and expert judgment, which cannot be provided by self-report questionnaires. We argue for a person-centered approach, and propose to rename 'pain catastrophizing' measures in line with what is better measured: 'pain-related worrying'.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Concerns have been raised about whether self-report measures of pain catastrophizing reflect the construct as defined in the cognitive-behavioral literature. We investigated the content of these self-report measures; that is, whether items assess the construct 'pain catastrophizing' and not other theoretical constructs (i.e., related constructs or pain outcomes) using the discriminant content validity method.
METHOD METHODS
Items (
RESULTS RESULTS
Data were analyzed using Bayesian hierarchical models. The results revealed that the items from pain-related worrying, vigilance, pain severity, distress, and disability questionnaires were distinctively related to their respective constructs. This was not observed for the items from the pain catastrophizing questionnaires. The content of the pain catastrophizing measures was equally well, or even better, captured by pain-related worrying or pain-related distress.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Based upon current findings, a recommendation may be to develop a novel pain catastrophizing questionnaire. However, we argue that pain catastrophizing cannot be assessed by self-report questionnaires. Pain catastrophizing requires contextual information, and expert judgment, which cannot be provided by self-report questionnaires. We argue for a person-centered approach, and propose to rename 'pain catastrophizing' measures in line with what is better measured: 'pain-related worrying'.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32181053
doi: 10.7717/peerj.8643
pii: 8643
pmc: PMC7060750
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e8643

Informations de copyright

©2020 Crombez et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Références

J Pain. 2006 Apr;7(4):261-71
pubmed: 16618470
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45
pubmed: 20494804
Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):65-71
pubmed: 11289090
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 23;7:1270
pubmed: 27602013
Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1560-2
pubmed: 22516589
Clin J Pain. 2001 Mar;17(1):52-64
pubmed: 11289089
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):477-484
pubmed: 31066141
J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27-36
pubmed: 3972947
Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):276-86
pubmed: 17071000
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):551-61
pubmed: 25542191
Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 May;9(5):745-58
pubmed: 19402782
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Aug;69(4):655-62
pubmed: 11550731
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011 Apr;7(4):216-24
pubmed: 21283147
Br J Clin Psychol. 1990 Nov;29(4):383-94
pubmed: 2149663
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981 Aug;49(4):517-25
pubmed: 6455451
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):22-9
pubmed: 24073095
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):1034-40; discussion 1041-6
pubmed: 22122674
Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1607-10
pubmed: 26859821
J Pain. 2015 Apr;16(4):306-17
pubmed: 25584430
Patient. 2018 Feb;11(1):107-117
pubmed: 28871427
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):11-23
pubmed: 26889874
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;34(1):11-23
pubmed: 12763390
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Feb;71(1):81-91
pubmed: 12602428
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 May;22(2):295-329
pubmed: 28271592
J Occup Rehabil. 2008 Dec;18(4):362-74
pubmed: 18958407
Br J Health Psychol. 2014 May;19(2):240-57
pubmed: 24628841
Eur J Pain. 2007 Jan;11(1):75-81
pubmed: 16545973
Pain. 2015 Oct;156(10):1978-90
pubmed: 26067388
J Pain. 2004 May;5(4):195-211
pubmed: 15162342
Pain. 2000 Apr;85(3):317-32
pubmed: 10781906
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94
pubmed: 20685078
J Headache Pain. 2015 Dec;16:1053
pubmed: 25971239
Pain. 2019 Sep;160(9):1946-1953
pubmed: 30694929
Qual Life Res. 2012 Jun;21(5):739-46
pubmed: 21866374
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Eur J Pain. 2009 Jul;13(6):620-8
pubmed: 19101182
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S12-21
pubmed: 17443114
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):437-55
pubmed: 22506584
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Nov;107(4):576-86
pubmed: 9830245
Pain. 2004 Feb;107(3):234-41
pubmed: 14736586
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:191-197
pubmed: 27792962
Pain. 2009 Sep;145(1-2):31-5
pubmed: 19427734
Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(4):461-70
pubmed: 3741311
Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jan;31(1):63-73
pubmed: 8417730
Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):193-203
pubmed: 11690733
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Aug;43(8):1055-67
pubmed: 15967176
J Appl Biobehav Res. 2013 Jun;18(2):82-103
pubmed: 24143062
Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):385-94
pubmed: 15207520
Pain. 1985 Dec;23(4):345-56
pubmed: 4088697
F1000Res. 2017 Apr 11;6:461
pubmed: 28413627
Pain. 2009 Sep;145(1-2):45-51
pubmed: 19477072
Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):33-44
pubmed: 6226916
Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-49
pubmed: 1408309
Cogn Behav Ther. 2013;42(3):215-23
pubmed: 23978106
Pain. 2007 Aug;130(3):249-53
pubmed: 17257751
Eur J Pain. 2016 Nov;20(10):1573-1586
pubmed: 27136510
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519

Auteurs

Geert Crombez (G)

Deparment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Annick L De Paepe (AL)

Deparment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Elke Veirman (E)

Deparment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Christopher Eccleston (C)

Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

Gregory Verleysen (G)

Ghent University, Research Support Office, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.

Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem (DML)

Deparment of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Experimental Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Institute for Health and Behaviour, INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Classifications MeSH