Perception of Dental Students and Laypersons to Altered Dentofacial Aesthetics.
Aesthetics
dental students
dentofacial
laypersons
perception
Journal
Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
ISSN: 2231-0762
Titre abrégé: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101618802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
15
08
2019
accepted:
03
10
2019
entrez:
18
3
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
18
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aims of the study were to comprehensively assess the perception of altered dentofacial aesthetics between dental students and laypersons and to identify the threshold where different variables such gender and clinical training impair dentofacial attractiveness. Ten photographs were digitally manipulated involving three facial, two smile, four dental, and one gingival components. Fifty images were randomized and rated according to attractiveness by two groups dental students which subdivided into preclinical students and clinical students, and laypersons. The participants evaluated the original and manipulated images using a visual analog scale. The responses were then analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. The results showed threshold levels of noticeable differences between varying levels of discrepancy. The overall perception of aesthetics was high among dental clinical students with the highest perception toward facial profile and the lowest toward gingival margin height. Of the respondents, no differences were found in the perception between male and female participants. Dental students perceived aesthetic components more accurately than laypersons. Dental students group had a better perception of dentofacial aesthetics than included laypersons. Unlike gender, clinical training has a substantial positive effect on the assessment of beauty. Dental students sub divided into dental preclinical students and dental clinical students (clinical training is a variable of all subgroups).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32181225
doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_340_19
pii: JISPCD-10-85
pmc: PMC7055345
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
85-95Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2020 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):957-65
pubmed: 24673657
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):141-51
pubmed: 16905057
Int J Esthet Dent. 2018;13(2):220-230
pubmed: 29687100
J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 Nov;8(4):
pubmed: 27590143
Semin Orthod. 1995 Jun;1(2):105-26
pubmed: 8935049
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):e171-80
pubmed: 21967955
Int Orthod. 2013 Dec;11(4):432-44
pubmed: 24427802
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):335-9
pubmed: 21447783
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Nov;117(3):313-32
pubmed: 15500809
Angle Orthod. 1993 Fall;63(3):175-82
pubmed: 8214785
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):69-75
pubmed: 30820086
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):349-54
pubmed: 15961569
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):103-11
pubmed: 20558590
Am J Orthod. 1985 Nov;88(5):402-8
pubmed: 3864374
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Aug;55(8):811-6; discussion 817
pubmed: 9251608
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Sep;30(5):415-426
pubmed: 30144369
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Aug;25(4):274-82
pubmed: 23910186
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):382-9
pubmed: 25466472
J Dent. 2012 Jul;40 Suppl 1:e72-81
pubmed: 22330323
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jun;145(6):750-6
pubmed: 24880845
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Mar;30(2):136-145
pubmed: 29285855
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018 Sep;18(3):193-202
pubmed: 30077373
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jan;115(1):29-37
pubmed: 22858016
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Feb;123(2):314-321
pubmed: 31153615