Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in patients with recurrent intracranial large vessel occlusion.
Aged
Angiography, Digital Subtraction
Cerebral Angiography
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Computed Tomography Angiography
Endovascular Procedures
/ methods
Female
Humans
Ischemic Stroke
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Recurrence
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Thrombectomy
/ methods
Aspiration thrombectomy
endovascular procedures
ischemic stroke
large vessel occlusion
recurrent stroke
Journal
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
19
3
2020
medline:
4
5
2021
entrez:
19
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data on the treatment with recurrent mechanical thrombectomy of patients with acute ischemic stroke with recurrent large vessel occlusion are limited. We report our experience with recurrent mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion. During the period between May 2013 and August 2018, data on patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion were collected. Baseline clinical characteristics, recanalization technique, recanalization rates and clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy were analyzed. Patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy were compared with patients who underwent single mechanical thrombectomy. During the study period, 7 of 474 patients (1.5%) were treated with mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion. The mean age of these patients was 64.4 (±7.9) years, and the mean time interval between thrombectomies was 47 (±48) h. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 12 (range 5-24) before the first and 20 (range 3-34) before the second procedure; the mean NIHSS at discharge was 5 (range 2-25). Good clinical outcome after repeated mechanical thrombectomy defined as modified Rankin scale of 0-2 was achieved in 29% of patients at three months of follow-up. Repeat mechanical thrombectomy is a rare procedure, but appears to be a feasible, safe and effective treatment option in patients with acute ischemic stroke and early recurrent large vessel occlusion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Data on the treatment with recurrent mechanical thrombectomy of patients with acute ischemic stroke with recurrent large vessel occlusion are limited. We report our experience with recurrent mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion.
METHODS
METHODS
During the period between May 2013 and August 2018, data on patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion were collected. Baseline clinical characteristics, recanalization technique, recanalization rates and clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy were analyzed. Patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy were compared with patients who underwent single mechanical thrombectomy.
RESULTS
RESULTS
During the study period, 7 of 474 patients (1.5%) were treated with mechanical thrombectomy for recurrent large vessel occlusion. The mean age of these patients was 64.4 (±7.9) years, and the mean time interval between thrombectomies was 47 (±48) h. The median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 12 (range 5-24) before the first and 20 (range 3-34) before the second procedure; the mean NIHSS at discharge was 5 (range 2-25). Good clinical outcome after repeated mechanical thrombectomy defined as modified Rankin scale of 0-2 was achieved in 29% of patients at three months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Repeat mechanical thrombectomy is a rare procedure, but appears to be a feasible, safe and effective treatment option in patients with acute ischemic stroke and early recurrent large vessel occlusion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32183596
doi: 10.1177/1591019920911532
pmc: PMC7446596
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
376-382Références
Stroke. 2018 Nov;49(11):2643-2651
pubmed: 30355192
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan;18(1):117-126
pubmed: 30415934
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):2070-2076
pubmed: 30337435
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Aug;66:107-112
pubmed: 31113697
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):526-532
pubmed: 31865897
Front Neurol. 2018 May 03;9:289
pubmed: 29774008
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1489-94
pubmed: 21454819
Stroke. 2019 Oct;50(10):2960-2963
pubmed: 31535931
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Sep;26(9):e180-e182
pubmed: 28673810
Stroke. 2016 Aug;47(8):2133-5
pubmed: 27364530
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Aug;9(8):743-749
pubmed: 27387708
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;26(2):195-204
pubmed: 31822162
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 08;10:204
pubmed: 30906279
J Stroke. 2013 Sep;15(3):182-8
pubmed: 24396812
Case Rep Vasc Med. 2015;2015:872817
pubmed: 25692066
Neurologist. 2011 Mar;17(2):95-7
pubmed: 21364363
Interv Neurol. 2017 Mar;6(1-2):1-7
pubmed: 28611827
J Clin Neurol. 2015 Jul;11(3):275-8
pubmed: 25749820