Evidence, theory and context: using intervention mapping in the development of a community-based self-management program for chronic low back pain in a rural African primary care setting - the good back program.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 22 01 2019
accepted: 24 02 2020
entrez: 19 3 2020
pubmed: 19 3 2020
medline: 23 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Rural Nigeria has one of the greatest burdens of low back pain but there are no effective evidence-based interventions to manage it in this population. This paper presents the application of the intervention mapping (IM) approach in the development of a complex behavior change intervention - The Good Back program, aimed at reducing non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) disability in rural Nigeria. The first four steps of IM were applied. A critical review of the literature, 2 qualitative studies and a population-based cross-sectional study in rural Nigeria helped to identify two key program objectives in order to reduce CLBP disability in this population: reduce the impact of illness perceptions, fear avoidance beliefs, catastrophising, anxiety and depression by targeting maladaptive illness perceptions about CLBP; and facilitate the adoption of exercises and good posture to limit disability. A systematic review plus these studies, identified the personal and environmental determinants of the performance objectives including health literacy, self-awareness, self-efficacy, personal preference, health professional skills, health facility structure and family/community support. The theory, techniques and strategies for modifying personal and environmental determinants were also identified from these studies. Intervention components and materials were then produced for practical application. The initial developed intervention was described. The feasibility and acceptability of the developed program was then tested using a small pragmatic non-randomised controlled study incorporating qualitative exit feedback interviews in a rural Nigerian primary health care centre. The program appeared feasible and acceptable when delivered by a highly trained physiotherapist. There were promising clinical outcomes in disability, pain intensity, illness perceptions, fear avoidance beliefs and pain medication use. Suggestions for program improvement included shorter but ongoing sessions, video demonstration of exercises/good posture, spacious exercise/demonstration rooms, and community legitimisation of exercise as treatment for back pain. Subsequent modifications to program content and delivery were then described. Theoretical modification included the addition of aspects of the social cognitive theory to the Leventhal's self-regulatory model of illness cognitions. IM appears to be a suitable framework for designing complex behavior change interventions in rural Nigeria. The need for further testing of the intervention was highlighted.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Rural Nigeria has one of the greatest burdens of low back pain but there are no effective evidence-based interventions to manage it in this population. This paper presents the application of the intervention mapping (IM) approach in the development of a complex behavior change intervention - The Good Back program, aimed at reducing non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) disability in rural Nigeria.
METHODS METHODS
The first four steps of IM were applied. A critical review of the literature, 2 qualitative studies and a population-based cross-sectional study in rural Nigeria helped to identify two key program objectives in order to reduce CLBP disability in this population: reduce the impact of illness perceptions, fear avoidance beliefs, catastrophising, anxiety and depression by targeting maladaptive illness perceptions about CLBP; and facilitate the adoption of exercises and good posture to limit disability. A systematic review plus these studies, identified the personal and environmental determinants of the performance objectives including health literacy, self-awareness, self-efficacy, personal preference, health professional skills, health facility structure and family/community support. The theory, techniques and strategies for modifying personal and environmental determinants were also identified from these studies. Intervention components and materials were then produced for practical application. The initial developed intervention was described.
RESULTS RESULTS
The feasibility and acceptability of the developed program was then tested using a small pragmatic non-randomised controlled study incorporating qualitative exit feedback interviews in a rural Nigerian primary health care centre. The program appeared feasible and acceptable when delivered by a highly trained physiotherapist. There were promising clinical outcomes in disability, pain intensity, illness perceptions, fear avoidance beliefs and pain medication use. Suggestions for program improvement included shorter but ongoing sessions, video demonstration of exercises/good posture, spacious exercise/demonstration rooms, and community legitimisation of exercise as treatment for back pain. Subsequent modifications to program content and delivery were then described. Theoretical modification included the addition of aspects of the social cognitive theory to the Leventhal's self-regulatory model of illness cognitions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
IM appears to be a suitable framework for designing complex behavior change interventions in rural Nigeria. The need for further testing of the intervention was highlighted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32183758
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8392-7
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-8392-7
pmc: PMC7077009
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

343

Subventions

Organisme : University Of Nigeria Nsukka
ID : 0000
Organisme : Schlumberger Foundation
ID : 0000

Références

Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(2):150-8
pubmed: 16581707
PM R. 2009 Feb;1(2):137-46
pubmed: 19627887
Int Health. 2018 May 1;10(3):137-148
pubmed: 29554307
J Pain. 2013 May;14(5):475-82
pubmed: 23452825
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 15;2(3):e000284
pubmed: 29225944
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367
pubmed: 29573870
Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):435-48
pubmed: 23162040
Lancet. 2003 Jan 18;361(9353):225-6
pubmed: 12547548
Br J Nutr. 2009 Dec;102(12):1847-53
pubmed: 19678966
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):309-18
pubmed: 22340966
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):426-37
pubmed: 21898672
BMJ. 2015 Feb 18;350:h444
pubmed: 25694111
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 07;(7):CD002014
pubmed: 20614428
Br J Health Psychol. 2013 May;18(2):296-309
pubmed: 23480428
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2013 Jul;41(4):398-407
pubmed: 23507293
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800
pubmed: 26063472
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):205-11
pubmed: 19931372
BMJ. 2010 Nov 24;341:c6325
pubmed: 21106618
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD007407
pubmed: 23152245
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Apr;39(8):779-790
pubmed: 27111492
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92
pubmed: 23159157
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Health Serv Insights. 2018 Oct 30;11:1178632918808783
pubmed: 30397385
BMC Public Health. 2014;14 Suppl 2:S5
pubmed: 25080940
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Apr;41(8):948-957
pubmed: 29239235
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(13):1100-6
pubmed: 19802926
JAMA. 2016 Dec 27;316(24):2618-2626
pubmed: 28027368
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2302
pubmed: 29573869
Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):153-66
pubmed: 24547801
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):297-312
pubmed: 26262912
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383
pubmed: 29573872
Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):180-185
pubmed: 27913064
Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701
pubmed: 19916637
Psychooncology. 2013 Oct;22(10):2186-92
pubmed: 23576518
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2013 Aug;26(4):621-7
pubmed: 24235028
Pain. 2010 Mar;148(3):398-406
pubmed: 20022697
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Dec;24(6):769-81
pubmed: 21665125
Trop Doct. 2004 Jan;34(1):17-20
pubmed: 14959964

Auteurs

Chinonso N Igwesi-Chidobe (CN)

Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria (Enugu Campus), Nsukka, Nigeria. chinonso.chidobe@unn.edu.ng.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK. chinonso.chidobe@unn.edu.ng.

Sheila Kitchen (S)

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.

Isaac O Sorinola (IO)

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.

Emma L Godfrey (EL)

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Population Health Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH