Learning or leaving? An international qualitative study of factors affecting the resilience of female family doctors.
family practice
health workforce
primary health care
resilience
transition
women
Journal
BJGP open
ISSN: 2398-3795
Titre abrégé: BJGP Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101713531
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
07
10
2019
accepted:
08
11
2019
pubmed:
19
3
2020
medline:
19
3
2020
entrez:
19
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Many countries have insufficient numbers of family doctors, and more females than males leave the workforce at a younger age or have difficulty sustaining careers. Understanding the differing attitudes, pressures, and perceptions between genders toward their medical occupation is important to minimise workforce attrition. AIM: To explore factors influencing the resilience of female family doctors during lifecycle transitions. DESIGN & SETTING: International qualitative study with female family doctors from all world regions. METHOD: Twenty semi-structured online Skype interviews, followed by three focus groups to develop recommendations. Data were transcribed and analysed using applied framework analysis. RESULTS: Interview participants described a complex interface between competing demands, expectations of their gender, and internalised expectations of themselves. Systemic barriers, such as lack of flexible working, excessive workload, and the cumulative impacts of unrealistic expectations impaired the ability to fully contribute in the workplace. At the individual level, resilience related to: the ability to make choices; previous experiences that had encouraged self-confidence; effective engagement to obtain support; and the ability to handle negative experiences. External support, such as strong personal networks, and an adaptive work setting and organisation or system maximised interviewees' professional contributions. CONCLUSION: On an international scale, female family doctors experience similar pressures from competing demands during lifecycle transitions; some of which relate to expectations of the female's 'role' in society, particularly around the additional personal pressures of caring commitments. Such situations could be predicted, planned for, and mitigated with explicit support mechanisms and availability of workplace choices. Healthcare organisations and systems around the world should recognise this need and implement recommendations to help reduce workforce losses. These findings are likely to be of interest to all health professional staff of any gender.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32184214
pii: bjgpopen20X101017
doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101017
pmc: PMC7330184
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, The Authors.
Références
Acad Med. 2016 Sep;91(9):1197-9
pubmed: 27438155
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2948-2958
pubmed: 27105721
S Afr Med J. 1999 Feb;89(2):165-9
pubmed: 10191870
Med Educ. 2012 Apr;46(4):349-56
pubmed: 22429170
Clin Med (Lond). 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6 Suppl 1):S5-40
pubmed: 16408403
Educ Prim Care. 2014 Jul;25(4):202-10
pubmed: 25198714
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 27;5(3):e005845
pubmed: 25818268
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016 Oct;28(7):629-637
pubmed: 27637552
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Oct 13;14(1):62
pubmed: 27737659
Hum Resour Health. 2015 Jul 31;13:64
pubmed: 26228911
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):244-51
pubmed: 27184995
BMJ. 2018 Dec 12;363:k4926
pubmed: 30541926
Lancet. 2017 Dec 2;390(10111):2423-2424
pubmed: 29208297
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186896
pubmed: 29073172
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 21;15(1):12
pubmed: 28222735
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Nov;23(11):927-34
pubmed: 25320867