The retrospective analysis of Antarctic tracking data project.
Journal
Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 03 2020
18 03 2020
Historique:
received:
22
05
2018
accepted:
12
10
2018
entrez:
20
3
2020
pubmed:
20
3
2020
medline:
20
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Retrospective Analysis of Antarctic Tracking Data (RAATD) is a Scientific Committee for Antarctic Research project led jointly by the Expert Groups on Birds and Marine Mammals and Antarctic Biodiversity Informatics, and endorsed by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. RAATD consolidated tracking data for multiple species of Antarctic meso- and top-predators to identify Areas of Ecological Significance. These datasets and accompanying syntheses provide a greater understanding of fundamental ecosystem processes in the Southern Ocean, support modelling of predator distributions under future climate scenarios and create inputs that can be incorporated into decision making processes by management authorities. In this data paper, we present the compiled tracking data from research groups that have worked in the Antarctic since the 1990s. The data are publicly available through biodiversity.aq and the Ocean Biogeographic Information System. The archive includes tracking data from over 70 contributors across 12 national Antarctic programs, and includes data from 17 predator species, 4060 individual animals, and over 2.9 million observed locations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32188863
doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0406-x
pii: 10.1038/s41597-020-0406-x
pmc: PMC7080749
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
94Références
Gutt, J. et al. The Southern Ocean ecosystem under multiple climate change stresses - an integrated circumpolar assessment. Glob. Change Biol. 21(4), 1434–1453 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12794
Turner, J. et al. Antarctic Climate Change and the Environment – 2016. (SCAR), http://www.scar.org/scar_media/documents/policyadvice/treatypapers/ATCM39_ip035_e.pdf (2016).
Abrams, P. A. et al. Necessary elements of precautionary management: implications for the Antarctic toothfish. Fish & Fish. 17, 1152–1174 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/faf.12162
Barnes, D. K. A. & Peck, L. S. Vulnerability of Antarctic shelf biodiversity to predicted regional warming. Clim. Res. 37, 149–163 (2008).
doi: 10.3354/cr00760
Trathan, P. N. & Agnew, D. Climate change and the Antarctic marine ecosystem: an essay on management implications. Antarct. Sci. 22, 387–398 (2010).
doi: 10.1017/S0954102010000222
Ingels, J. et al. Possible effects of global environmental changes on Antarctic benthos: a synthesis across five major taxa. Ecol. Evol. 2, 453–485 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/ece3.96
Trathan, P. N. et al. Pollution, habitat loss, fishing, and climate change as critical threats to penguins. Conserv. Biol. 29(1), 31–41 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/cobi.12349
Stammerjohn, S., Massom, R., Rind, D. & Martinson, D. Regions of rapid sea ice change: An inter-hemispheric seasonal comparison. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39(6) (2012).
Kennicutt, M. C. et al. Six priorities for Antarctic science. Nature 512(7512), 23–25 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/512023a
Ropert-Coudert, Y. et al. In Biogeographic Atlas Of The Southern Ocean (eds. De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., Held, C., Hosie, G., Huettmann, F., Post, A. & Ropert-Coudert, Y.) Ch. 8 (SCAR, Cambridge, 2014).
De Broyer C. et al. Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean (Cambridge, Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, 2014).
Block, B. A. et al. Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475(7354), 86–90 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nature10082
Ropert-Coudert, Y. & Wilson, R. P. Trends and perspectives in animal-attached remote-sensing. Frontiers Ecol. Environ. 3, 437–444 (2005).
doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0437:TAPIAR]2.0.CO;2
Treasure, A. M. et al. Marine Mammals Exploring the Oceans Pole to Pole: A review of the MEOP consortium. Oceanography 30(2), 132–138 (2017).
doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2017.234
Hussey, N. E. et al. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642 (2015).
doi: 10.1126/science.1255642
Hindell, M. A. et al. In The Kerguelen Plateau: marine ecosystem and fisheries (eds. Duhamel, G. & Welsford, D.) (Paris, Société Française d’Ichtyologie, 2011).
Raymond, B. et al. Important marine habitat off east Antarctica revealed by two decades of multi-species predator tracking. Ecography 38, 121–129 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/ecog.01021
Reisinger, R. R. et al. Habitat modelling of tracking data from multiple marine predators identifies important areas in the Southern Indian Ocean. Divers. Distributions 24, 535–550 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/ddi.12702
Ballard, G. et al. Responding to climate change: Adélie penguins confront astronomical and ocean boundaries. Ecology 91, 2056–2069 (2010).
doi: 10.1890/09-0688.1
Delord, K. et al. Areas of importance for seabirds tracked from French southern territories, and recommendations for conservation. Mar. Policy 48, 1–13 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.019
Xavier, J. C. et al. Future Challenges in Southern Ocean Ecology Research. Frontiers Mar. Sci. 3, 94 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00094
Hays, G. C. et al. Key Questions in Marine Megafauna Movement. Ecology. TREE 31, 463–475 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.015
Ropert-Coudert, Y. et al. The Retrospective Analysis of Antarctic Tracking Data Project. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4246466 (2018).
Hindell, M. A. et al. Tracking predator communities to protect the Southern Ocean. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2126-y (2020).
Merkel, B. et al. probabilistic algorithm to process geolocation data. Mov. Ecol. 4, 26 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s40462-016-0091-8
Phillips, R. A., Silk, J. R. D., Croxall, J. P., Afanasyev, V. & Briggs, D. R. Accuracy of geolocation estimates for flying seabirds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 266, 265–272 (2004).
doi: 10.3354/meps266265
Sumner, M. D., Wotherspoon, S. J. & Hindell, M. A. Bayesian Estimation of Animal Movement from Archival and Satellite Tags. PLoS ONE 4(10), e7324 (2009).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007324
Lisovski, S. & Hahn, S. GeoLight - processing and analysing light-based geolocator data in R. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 1055–1059 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00248.x
Bindoff, A. geolocationHMM. GitHub, https://github.com/ABindoff/geolocationHMM (2017).
Wotherspoon, S. SGAT. GitHub, https://github.com/SWotherspoon/SGAT (2017).
Lopez, R., Malarde, J. P., Royer, F. & Gaspar, P. Improving Argos doppler location using multiple-model Kalman filtering. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 52(8), 4744–4755 (2014).
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2284293
Bannasch, R., Wilson, R. P. & Culik, B. Hydrodynamic aspects of design and attachment of a back-mounted device in penguins. J. Exp. Biol. 194(1), 83–96 (1994).
Walker, B. G. & Boveng, P. L. Effects of time–depth recorders on maternal foraging and attendance behavior of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella). Can. J. Zool. 73, 1538–1544 (1995).
doi: 10.1139/z95-182
Phillips, R. A., Xavier, J. C. & Croxall, J. P. Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. The Auk 120(4), 1082–1090 (2003).
doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[1082:EOSTOA]2.0.CO;2
McCafferty, D. J., Currie, J. & Sparling, C. E. The effect of instrument attachment on the surface temperature of juvenile grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) as measured by infrared thermography. Deep Sea Res. Part 2 Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 54(3-4), 424–436 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.11.019
Vandenabeele, S. P., Shepard, E. L., Grogan, A. & Wilson, R. P. When three per cent may not be three per cent; device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints. Mar. Biol. 159(1), 1–14 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s00227-011-1784-6
Field, I. C. et al. Refining instrument attachment on phocid seals. Mar. Mammal Sci. 28, E325–E332 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2011.00519.x
Jonsen, I. D., Flemming, J. M. & Myers, R. A. Robust State-Space modeling of animal movement data. Ecology 86, 2874–2880 (2005).
doi: 10.1890/04-1852
Nash, J. C. On best practice optimization methods in R. J. Stat. Softw. 60(2), 1–14 (2014).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v060.i02
De Pooter, D. et al. Toward a new data standard for combined marine biological and environmental datasets - expanding OBIS beyond species occurrences. Biodiv. Data J. 5, e10989 (2017).
doi: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e10989
Ropert-Coudert, Y. et al. Standardized Data from the Retrospective Analysis of Antarctic Tracking Data Project from the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Australian Antarctic Data Centre, Australia. https://doi.org/10.4225/15/5afcb927e8162 (2018).
Ropert-Coudert, Y. et al. Filtered Data from the Retrospective Analysis of Antarctic Tracking Data Project from the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research. Australian Antarctic Data Centre, Australia. https://doi.org/10.4225/15/5afcadad6c130 (2018).
Johnson, D. S., London, J. M., Lea, M. A. & Durban, J. W. Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. Ecology 89, 1208–1215 (2008).
doi: 10.1890/07-1032.1
R version 3.3.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2016).
Kristensen, K., Nielsen, A., Berg, C. W., Skaug, H. & Bell, B. M. TMB: automatic differentiation and Laplace approximation. J. Stat. Softw. 70, 1–21 (2016).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v070.i05
Albertsen, C. M., Whoriskey, K., Yurkowski, D., Nielsen, A. & Mills Flemming, J. Fast fitting of non-Gaussian state-space models to animal movement data via Template Model Builder. Ecology 96, 2598–2604 (2015).
doi: 10.1890/14-2101.1
Jonsen, I. D. et al. State-space models for bio-loggers: A methodological road map. Deep-Sea Res. II 88-89, 34–46 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.07.008
Wakefield, E. D. et al. Habitat preference, accessibility, and competition limit the global distribution of breeding Black-browed Albatrosses. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 141–167 (2011).
doi: 10.1890/09-0763.1
Parsons, M. A. et al. A conceptual framework for managing very diverse data for complex, interdisciplinary science. J. Inf. Sci. 37(6), 555–569 (2011).
doi: 10.1177/0165551511412705