Parent preferences for text messages containing infant feeding advice.

Health promotion infant care pediatric obesity text messaging

Journal

mHealth
ISSN: 2306-9740
Titre abrégé: Mhealth
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101678564

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 22 08 2019
accepted: 25 10 2019
entrez: 20 3 2020
pubmed: 20 3 2020
medline: 20 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Text-messaging is beneficial in health promotion. Research on impact of message framing (gain- versus loss-framed) has had variable results, depending on type of behavior targeted. There is no research on framing of text-messaging to promote healthful infant feeding practices. The purpose of this cross-sectional survey was to examine whether parents of infants aged three months or younger viewed gain- or loss-framed text messages as more helpful and which style was viewed as more likely to affect feeding practices. A secondary purpose was to determine what time of day and frequency of messaging was preferred. Parents were recruited from an urban pediatric medical clinic. PsychData was used to administer the survey. Parents rated message pairs targeting constructs of the Health Belief Model using a five-point Likert scale. Paired t- tests compared overall ratings for helpfulness and likelihood of messages affecting feeding practices between gain- and loss-framed messages. Descriptive and frequency analyses were applied to demographics and questions regarding preferred timing for receiving messages. A total of 34 parents (3 fathers and 31 mothers, mean age 26±5.5 years) completed the survey, with 41% enrolled in WIC and 29% in SNAP. There was no overall difference in helpfulness or likelihood of messages affecting feeding practices between gain- and loss-framed messages. Message style did not affect likelihood of adopting a feeding practice. However, gain framed messages relating to benefits and self-efficacy for breastfeeding were viewed more positively (mean =2.32; P=0.034; mean =1.79; P=0.041, respectively). The greatest proportion of parents (38%) preferred receiving messages once per week, and 50% preferred morning messages. Framing of text messages appeared to have little effect on parents' acceptance of messages related to infant feeding practices. Parents were receptive to receiving messages from their infant's healthcare provider once per week, in the morning.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Text-messaging is beneficial in health promotion. Research on impact of message framing (gain- versus loss-framed) has had variable results, depending on type of behavior targeted. There is no research on framing of text-messaging to promote healthful infant feeding practices.
METHODS METHODS
The purpose of this cross-sectional survey was to examine whether parents of infants aged three months or younger viewed gain- or loss-framed text messages as more helpful and which style was viewed as more likely to affect feeding practices. A secondary purpose was to determine what time of day and frequency of messaging was preferred. Parents were recruited from an urban pediatric medical clinic. PsychData was used to administer the survey. Parents rated message pairs targeting constructs of the Health Belief Model using a five-point Likert scale. Paired t- tests compared overall ratings for helpfulness and likelihood of messages affecting feeding practices between gain- and loss-framed messages. Descriptive and frequency analyses were applied to demographics and questions regarding preferred timing for receiving messages.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 34 parents (3 fathers and 31 mothers, mean age 26±5.5 years) completed the survey, with 41% enrolled in WIC and 29% in SNAP. There was no overall difference in helpfulness or likelihood of messages affecting feeding practices between gain- and loss-framed messages. Message style did not affect likelihood of adopting a feeding practice. However, gain framed messages relating to benefits and self-efficacy for breastfeeding were viewed more positively (mean =2.32; P=0.034; mean =1.79; P=0.041, respectively). The greatest proportion of parents (38%) preferred receiving messages once per week, and 50% preferred morning messages.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Framing of text messages appeared to have little effect on parents' acceptance of messages related to infant feeding practices. Parents were receptive to receiving messages from their infant's healthcare provider once per week, in the morning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32190620
doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.11.03
pii: mh-06-2019.11.03
pmc: PMC7063264
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

9

Informations de copyright

2020 mHealth. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 May;21(2):249-67
pubmed: 26333060
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 25;6(1):e9
pubmed: 29371178
Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):
pubmed: 29159919
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Nov;47(5):674-80
pubmed: 25245800
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Sep;60:24-33
pubmed: 28600160
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 01;14(12):
pubmed: 29194402
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Apr 19;4(2):e41
pubmed: 27095507
Nutr Rev. 2015 Jan;73(1):4-11
pubmed: 26024053
Indian J Pediatr. 2018 Jun;85(6):461-462
pubmed: 29455329
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 31;9(7):e103892
pubmed: 25078965
Obes Rev. 2015 Jul;16(7):547-65
pubmed: 25893796
Children (Basel). 2017 Dec 04;4(12):
pubmed: 29207536
Child Obes. 2015 Dec;11(6):691-5
pubmed: 26562758
Eur J Nutr. 2018 Aug;57(5):1985-1993
pubmed: 29470690
Psychol Rep. 2015 Dec;117(3):692-702
pubmed: 26595292
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Oct;(288):1-8
pubmed: 29155689

Auteurs

Cassandra Brown (C)

Texas Woman's University, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Denton, TX, USA.

Kathleen E Davis (KE)

Texas Woman's University, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Denton, TX, USA.

Nusrath Habiba (N)

University of North Texas Health Science Center, Ft. Worth, TX, USA.

Marilyn Massey-Stokes (M)

Texas Woman's University, School of Health Promotion and Kinesiology, Denton, TX, USA.

Cynthia Warren (C)

Texas Woman's University, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Denton, TX, USA.

Classifications MeSH