Birch bark tar in early Medieval England - Continuity of tradition or technological revival?

Betulin Birch bark tar Early Medieval HT-GC/MS Lipids

Journal

Journal of archaeological science, reports
ISSN: 2352-409X
Titre abrégé: J Archaeol Sci Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101695468

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
entrez: 20 3 2020
pubmed: 20 3 2020
medline: 20 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Birch bark tar is a manufactured product with a history of production and use that reaches back to the Palaeolithic. Its sticky, water resistant and biocidal properties mean that it has a wide range of applications, for example, as a multipurpose adhesive, sealant and in medicine. Archaeological evidence for birch bark tar in the old world covers a broad geographic range from the UK to the Baltic and from the Mediterranean to Scandinavia. In the east and north of this range there is continuity of use to modern times but in western Europe and the British Isles the use of birch bark tar has generally been viewed as limited to prehistory, with gradual displacement by pine tars during the Roman period. Here, we report new finds of birch bark tar from two early Medieval sites in the east of England. Analysis by HT-GC/MS to identify the tars also revealed fatty material, possibly added to modify the tar. The different contexts of the finds point to diverse applications of the material: in one case perhaps a medicine, the other associated with a ceramic container, possibly used for processing the tar. The results present the first identification of birch bark tar from early Medieval archaeological contexts in the UK. Together they indicate a later period of use for birch bark tar in the UK than has been previously observed and raise the question of whether this indicates evidence of a longer continuity of use than hitherto recognised or a later reintroduction of the technology in the Medieval period, in which case the similarities between the find sites, both early Anglo-Saxon cemeteries with comparable assemblages of grave goods, may be significant.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32190727
doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.102118
pii: S2352-409X(19)30382-7
pii: 102118
pmc: PMC7063695
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102118

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors.

Références

Nat Prod Rep. 2006 Dec;23(6):919-42
pubmed: 17119640
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0166276
pubmed: 27906999
Anal Chem. 2002 Mar 1;74(5):965-75
pubmed: 11924999
J Sep Sci. 2004 Feb;27(3):244-54
pubmed: 15334911
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):8033
pubmed: 28860591
PLoS One. 2016 May 06;11(5):e0154933
pubmed: 27152419

Auteurs

Rebecca J Stacey (RJ)

Department of Scientific Research, British Museum, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DG, UK.

Julie Dunne (J)

Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK.

Sue Brunning (S)

Department of Britain, Europe and Prehistory, British Museum, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DG, UK.

Thibaut Devièse (T)

Department of Scientific Research, British Museum, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DG, UK.

Richard Mortimer (R)

Oxford Archaeology East, 15 Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridgeshire, CB23 8SQ, UK.

Stuart Ladd (S)

Oxford Archaeology East, 15 Trafalgar Way, Bar Hill, Cambridgeshire, CB23 8SQ, UK.

Keith Parfitt (K)

Canterbury Archaeological Trust Ltd, 92A Broad Street, Canterbury, Kent CT1 2LU, UK.

Richard Evershed (R)

Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK.

Ian Bull (I)

Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, UK.

Classifications MeSH