Biochemical, immunochemical and serology analytes validation of the lithium heparin BD Barricor blood collection tube on a highly automated Roche COBAS8000 instrument.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 03 2020
19 03 2020
Historique:
received:
20
01
2020
accepted:
22
01
2020
entrez:
20
3
2020
pubmed:
20
3
2020
medline:
13
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recently developed blood tubes with a barrier to provide plasma are becoming widespread. We compared 43 biochemical, 35 immunochemical and 7 serology analytes in a BD-Vacutainer® Barricor tube for local clinical validation of this lithium-heparin tube with a barrier. Samples from 70 volunteers were collected in different BD-tubes: a clot-activator tube with gel (SST), a lithium-heparin tube with gel (PST), and a lithium-heparin tube with barrier (BAR). Biases from Bland-Altman plots and 95% confidence intervals were compared with the desirable specification from the Ricos database in order to verify whether measurements from different tubes were significantly different. For most of the analytes tested, the measurements using SST, PST or BAR tubes were equivalent. Only BIC, GLU, K, LAD, LPA, P, TP, CTX, Ferritin, HGH, vitD3 and ANTIS showed statistically significant, between-tubes, differences which might have clinical implication. The study demonstrates that SST, PST and BAR can be used interchangeably for most of the analytes tested, including serology analytes. This allows the use of the same tube for assaying multiple analytes, increasing the laboratory efficiency while decreasing patients discomfort by minimizing blood withdrawal.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Recently developed blood tubes with a barrier to provide plasma are becoming widespread. We compared 43 biochemical, 35 immunochemical and 7 serology analytes in a BD-Vacutainer® Barricor tube for local clinical validation of this lithium-heparin tube with a barrier.
METHODS
Samples from 70 volunteers were collected in different BD-tubes: a clot-activator tube with gel (SST), a lithium-heparin tube with gel (PST), and a lithium-heparin tube with barrier (BAR). Biases from Bland-Altman plots and 95% confidence intervals were compared with the desirable specification from the Ricos database in order to verify whether measurements from different tubes were significantly different.
RESULTS
For most of the analytes tested, the measurements using SST, PST or BAR tubes were equivalent. Only BIC, GLU, K, LAD, LPA, P, TP, CTX, Ferritin, HGH, vitD3 and ANTIS showed statistically significant, between-tubes, differences which might have clinical implication.
CONCLUSIONS
The study demonstrates that SST, PST and BAR can be used interchangeably for most of the analytes tested, including serology analytes. This allows the use of the same tube for assaying multiple analytes, increasing the laboratory efficiency while decreasing patients discomfort by minimizing blood withdrawal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32191654
doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i1.9195
pmc: PMC7569594
doi:
Substances chimiques
Heparin
9005-49-6
Lithium
9FN79X2M3F
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
47-55Références
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jan;282:127-132
pubmed: 29197242
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Oct 15;27(3):030706
pubmed: 28900369
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Jun 15;28(2):020902
pubmed: 29666561
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Feb 15;28(1):010704
pubmed: 29187797
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2019 Nov 1;18(11):2696-2706
pubmed: 31556901
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21230
pubmed: 21760889
Clin Biochem. 2010 Jan;43(1-2):4-25
pubmed: 19822139
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 May;54(5):755-60
pubmed: 26849876
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jul;288:211-217
pubmed: 29775921
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47(2):237-41
pubmed: 19191732
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014 Oct 15;24(3):368-75
pubmed: 25351355
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Aug;483:271-274
pubmed: 29753681