Design Fluency in Children with ADHD and Comorbid Disorders.
anxiety disorders
attention deficit and disruptive behavior disorders
developmental disabilities
executive function
oppositional defiant disorder
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Mar 2020
17 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
30
06
2019
revised:
12
03
2020
accepted:
13
03
2020
entrez:
21
3
2020
pubmed:
21
3
2020
medline:
21
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often associated with frontal executive impairment in children. Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and anxiety disorders (AD) frequently accompany ADHD, but the impact of these comorbid disorders on cognition remains elusive. The five-point test (FPT), a design fluency task, has been shown to be sensitive to neurological damage, specifically to frontal lobe lesions in patients with brain injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the performances of neurotypical children with that of children with ADHD, ADHD-ODD, and ADHD-AD on the FPT in order to examine whether these groups could be distinguished from one another based on their cognitive profile. A total of 111 children aged 8 to 11 years old participated in the study. Six measures from the FPT were used to characterize their performance. Statistically significant differences between groups were observed for five of the six FPT measures. Essentially, children with ADHD-ODD made more repeated designs than the three other groups (control This suggests that comorbidities have an additive impact on the cognitive profile of children with ADHD. Design fluency may be a sensitive measure for capturing the subtle cognitive deficits that are likely to be involved in these disorders.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is often associated with frontal executive impairment in children. Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and anxiety disorders (AD) frequently accompany ADHD, but the impact of these comorbid disorders on cognition remains elusive. The five-point test (FPT), a design fluency task, has been shown to be sensitive to neurological damage, specifically to frontal lobe lesions in patients with brain injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the performances of neurotypical children with that of children with ADHD, ADHD-ODD, and ADHD-AD on the FPT in order to examine whether these groups could be distinguished from one another based on their cognitive profile.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 111 children aged 8 to 11 years old participated in the study. Six measures from the FPT were used to characterize their performance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Statistically significant differences between groups were observed for five of the six FPT measures. Essentially, children with ADHD-ODD made more repeated designs than the three other groups (control
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This suggests that comorbidities have an additive impact on the cognitive profile of children with ADHD. Design fluency may be a sensitive measure for capturing the subtle cognitive deficits that are likely to be involved in these disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32192012
pii: brainsci10030172
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10030172
pmc: PMC7139708
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;22(8):969-78
pubmed: 17920807
Front Behav Neurosci. 2009 Oct 12;3:35
pubmed: 19862349
Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Dec;55(3 Pt 1):839-44
pubmed: 7162920
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;162(6):1067-75
pubmed: 15930054
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;28(4):692-708
pubmed: 18036711
Percept Mot Skills. 1985 Dec;61(3 Pt 1):699-709
pubmed: 4088759
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):621-37
pubmed: 21044790
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Nov 30;174(2):81-8
pubmed: 19833485
Biol Psychiatry. 1998 May 1;43(9):666-73
pubmed: 9583000
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):1168-77
pubmed: 21546000
Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16(1):32-41
pubmed: 19626494
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Dec;10(12):885-92
pubmed: 19904278
Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;20(1):407-28
pubmed: 11827096
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Aug;27(8):468-74
pubmed: 15271494
Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Mar;26(1):44-72
pubmed: 26846227
Neuron. 2006 Apr 20;50(2):329-39
pubmed: 16630842
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;21(3):340-353
pubmed: 29484581
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Jul;24(6):531-539
pubmed: 29576028
Psychol Med. 2014 Jul;44(9):1989-2001
pubmed: 24176104
Behav Brain Res. 2002 Mar 10;130(1-2):3-28
pubmed: 11864714
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e69-87
pubmed: 21094938
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1215-20
pubmed: 15949990
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1224-30
pubmed: 15949992
Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(2):162-80
pubmed: 21347919
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;48(12):1251-8
pubmed: 18093031
Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Dec 06;7:174
pubmed: 24367325
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2014 Jun;17(2):125-56
pubmed: 24357109
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Fall;20(4):1145-59
pubmed: 18838035
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;4(4):310-319
pubmed: 28219628
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Apr 1;65(7):620-4
pubmed: 19150052
Psychophysiology. 2007 May;44(3):352-63
pubmed: 17433094
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Nov;37(8):1123-35
pubmed: 19543967
Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Dec;20(4):349-61
pubmed: 21069466
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Nov;14(11):786-99
pubmed: 24105343
J Atten Disord. 2015 Sep;19(9):771-8
pubmed: 23139376
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar;10(3):117-23
pubmed: 16460990
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):462-70
pubmed: 21300675
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;33(9):1005-15
pubmed: 21942563
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;52(10):1035-43
pubmed: 21827452
Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;26(2):571-93
pubmed: 15456685
Psychol Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):1475-86
pubmed: 23111120
Neuropsychologia. 1977;15(4-5):653-74
pubmed: 896022
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Aug;24(5):615-32
pubmed: 12187445
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;13(6):362-4
pubmed: 15619048
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1994 Jul-Aug;33(6):858-68
pubmed: 8083143
Child Neuropsychol. 2016;22(2):197-219
pubmed: 25495262
Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(32):5180-5
pubmed: 24410567
J Atten Disord. 2011 Nov;15(8):646-55
pubmed: 20858784
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;9(2):81-6
pubmed: 9242893
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2009 Sep;32(3):549-75
pubmed: 19716990
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;29(4):540-5
pubmed: 2387788
Child Neuropsychol. 2016;22(2):238-46
pubmed: 25495079
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;49(4):345-55
pubmed: 20410727
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997 Jul;36(7):381-93
pubmed: 9241475
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 23;11:115-26
pubmed: 25670901
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1740-8
pubmed: 12365958
J Atten Disord. 2006 Nov;10(2):141-9
pubmed: 17085624
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;16(1):52-60
pubmed: 22177031
Psychophysiology. 1999 Sep;36(5):628-37
pubmed: 10442031
Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):65-94
pubmed: 9000892
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48789
pubmed: 23144970
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2008 Jul 03;2(1):15
pubmed: 18598351
Behav Brain Sci. 2003 Feb;26(1):65-82; discussion 82-137
pubmed: 14598440
J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 27;31(17):6296-304
pubmed: 21525269
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Oct;31(10):851-61
pubmed: 24677490
Neurologia. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(6):348-55
pubmed: 22906981
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;74(9):902-17
pubmed: 24107764
Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;20(1):331-54
pubmed: 11827092
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1991 Mar;32(3):453-61
pubmed: 2061365
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;55(12):1105-12
pubmed: 9862554
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 May;37(4):551-64
pubmed: 19016322
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Mar;49(4):745-59
pubmed: 20950634
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Feb;25(1):7-13
pubmed: 9093895
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;41(11):1275-93
pubmed: 12410070
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Apr;129(4):759-765
pubmed: 29448150