Affordability and Availability of Child Restraints in an Under-Served Population in South Africa.


Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 03 2020
Historique:
received: 19 02 2020
revised: 14 03 2020
accepted: 14 03 2020
entrez: 21 3 2020
pubmed: 21 3 2020
medline: 29 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Child road traffic injuries are a major global public health problem and the issue is particularly burdensome in middle-income countries such as South Africa where injury death rates are 41 per 100,000 for under 5's and 24.5 per 100,000 for 5-14-year-old. Despite their known effectiveness in reducing injuries amongst children, the rates of use of child restraint systems (CRS) remains low in South Africa. Little is known about barriers to child restraint use especially in low- and middle-income countries. We carried out observation studies and parent/carer surveys in 7 suburbs of Cape Town over a three month period to assess usage rates and explore the knowledge and perceptions of parents towards child restraint legislation, ownership and cost; Results: Only 7.8% of child passengers were observed to be properly restrained in a CRS with driver seatbelt use and single child occupancy being associated with higher child restraint use. 92% of survey respondents claimed to have knowledge of current child restraint legislation, however, only 32% of those parents/carers were able to correctly identify the age requirements and penalty. Reasons given for not owning a child seat included high cost and the belief that seatbelts were a suitable alternative. These findings indicate the need for a tighter legislation with an increased fine paired with enhanced enforcement of both adult seatbelt and child restraint use. The provision of low-cost/subsidised CRS or borrowing schemes and targeted social marketing through online fora, well baby clinics, early learning centres would be beneficial in increasing ownership and use of CRS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Child road traffic injuries are a major global public health problem and the issue is particularly burdensome in middle-income countries such as South Africa where injury death rates are 41 per 100,000 for under 5's and 24.5 per 100,000 for 5-14-year-old. Despite their known effectiveness in reducing injuries amongst children, the rates of use of child restraint systems (CRS) remains low in South Africa. Little is known about barriers to child restraint use especially in low- and middle-income countries.
METHODS
We carried out observation studies and parent/carer surveys in 7 suburbs of Cape Town over a three month period to assess usage rates and explore the knowledge and perceptions of parents towards child restraint legislation, ownership and cost; Results: Only 7.8% of child passengers were observed to be properly restrained in a CRS with driver seatbelt use and single child occupancy being associated with higher child restraint use. 92% of survey respondents claimed to have knowledge of current child restraint legislation, however, only 32% of those parents/carers were able to correctly identify the age requirements and penalty. Reasons given for not owning a child seat included high cost and the belief that seatbelts were a suitable alternative.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings indicate the need for a tighter legislation with an increased fine paired with enhanced enforcement of both adult seatbelt and child restraint use. The provision of low-cost/subsidised CRS or borrowing schemes and targeted social marketing through online fora, well baby clinics, early learning centres would be beneficial in increasing ownership and use of CRS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32192206
pii: ijerph17061979
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061979
pmc: PMC7143186
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Références

Bull World Health Organ. 2015 May 1;93(5):303-13
pubmed: 26229201
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Sep;4(9):e642-53
pubmed: 27539806
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jun;160(6):617-21
pubmed: 16754824
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Sep;15(5):482-6
pubmed: 19779990
Public Health. 2017 Mar;144S:S5-S14
pubmed: 28288732
S Afr Med J. 2011 Mar 01;101(3):146
pubmed: 21382237
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 07;14:318
pubmed: 24708776
J R Soc Promot Health. 2004 Nov;124(6):280-3
pubmed: 15602998
Accid Anal Prev. 1999 Sep;31(5):555-66
pubmed: 10440553
Arch Dis Child. 2014 Jan;99(1):62-9
pubmed: 24187033
Zdr Varst. 2016 Nov 6;56(1):55-64
pubmed: 28289464
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2013;20(4):358-67
pubmed: 23230995
S Afr Med J. 2019 Jan 31;109(2):12544
pubmed: 30834854
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Oct;43(5):761-7
pubmed: 19738994
S Afr Med J. 2013 Aug 06;103(9):628-31
pubmed: 24300680
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Nov;21(4 Suppl):31-47
pubmed: 11691560
Injury. 2015;46(6):933-4
pubmed: 26003092
Inj Prev. 1998 Sep;4(3):181-7
pubmed: 9788087
Popul Health Metr. 2015 Aug 07;13:20
pubmed: 26300697
Lancet. 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):1011-1022
pubmed: 19709732
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S41-5
pubmed: 26436241
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):661-666
pubmed: 31356109
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128
pubmed: 23245604
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):85-8
pubmed: 24355676
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124(5):1281-6
pubmed: 19841126
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 28;13(10):
pubmed: 27690070
Am J Public Health. 2012 Dec;102(12):e96-102
pubmed: 23078492
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2013;20(4):385-93
pubmed: 23316999
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Jun;10(3):297-301
pubmed: 19452372
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jan;161(1):65-8
pubmed: 17199069
S Afr Med J. 2019 Jul 26;109(8):12672
pubmed: 31456543
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Apr;113:325-329
pubmed: 29477798
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):686-91
pubmed: 26889569
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 08;11:281
pubmed: 21548995

Auteurs

Prasanthi Puvanachandra (P)

The George Institute for Global Health UK, Oxford University, OX1 2BQ Oxford, UK.
University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

Aliasgher Janmohammed (A)

ChildSafe South Africa, Woolworths ChildSafe Research and Educational Centre, Red Cross Children's Hospital, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.

Pumla Mtambeka (P)

ChildSafe South Africa, Woolworths ChildSafe Research and Educational Centre, Red Cross Children's Hospital, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.

Megan Prinsloo (M)

Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Hospital, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa.

Sebastian Van As (SV)

Red Cross Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.

Margaret M Peden (MM)

The George Institute for Global Health UK, Oxford University, OX1 2BQ Oxford, UK.
University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH