Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Adult
Aminosalicylic Acid
/ adverse effects
Antitubercular Agents
/ adverse effects
Canada
/ epidemiology
Clofazimine
/ adverse effects
Diarylquinolines
/ adverse effects
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
/ epidemiology
Female
Fluoroquinolones
/ adverse effects
Humans
Incidence
Linezolid
/ adverse effects
Male
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
/ drug effects
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
/ drug therapy
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
/ drug therapy
Journal
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 2213-2619
Titre abrégé: Lancet Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
19
08
2019
revised:
08
11
2019
accepted:
11
11
2019
pubmed:
21
3
2020
medline:
1
9
2020
entrez:
21
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis requires long-term therapy with a combination of multiple second-line drugs. These drugs are associated with numerous adverse events that can cause severe morbidity, such as deafness, and in some instances can lead to death. Our aim was to estimate the absolute and relative frequency of adverse events associated with different tuberculosis drugs to provide useful information for clinicians and tuberculosis programmes in selecting optimal treatment regimens. We did a meta-analysis using individual-level patient data that were obtained from studies that reported adverse events that resulted in permanent discontinuation of anti-tuberculosis medications. We used a database created for our previous meta-analysis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment and outcomes, for which we did a systematic review of literature published between Jan 1, 2009, and Aug 31, 2015 (updated April 15, 2016), and requested individual patient-level information from authors. We also considered for this analysis studies contributing patient-level data in response to a public call made by WHO in 2018. Meta-analysis for proportions and arm-based network meta-analysis were done to estimate the incidence of adverse events for each tuberculosis drug. 58 studies were identified, including 50 studies from the updated individual patient data meta-analysis for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. 35 of these studies, with 9178 patients, were included in our analysis. Using meta-analysis of proportions, drugs with low risks of adverse event occurrence leading to permanent discontinuation included levofloxacin (1·3% [95% CI 0·3-5·0]), moxifloxacin (2·9% [1·6-5·0]), bedaquiline (1·7% [0·7-4·2]), and clofazimine (1·6% [0·5-5·3]). Relatively high incidence of adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation was seen with three second-line injectable drugs (amikacin: 10·2% [6·3-16·0]; kanamycin: 7·5% [4·6-11·9]; capreomycin: 8·2% [6·3-10·7]), aminosalicylic acid (11·6% [7·1-18·3]), and linezolid (14·1% [9·9-19·6]). Risk of bias in selection of studies was judged to be low because there were no important differences between included and excluded studies. Variability between studies was significant for most outcomes analysed. Fluoroquinolones, clofazimine, and bedaquiline had the lowest incidence of adverse events leading to permanent drug discontinuation, whereas second-line injectable drugs, aminosalicylic acid, and linezolid had the highest incidence. These results suggest that close monitoring of adverse events is important for patients being treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Our results also underscore the urgent need for safer and better-tolerated drugs to reduce morbidity from treatment itself for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA), American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis requires long-term therapy with a combination of multiple second-line drugs. These drugs are associated with numerous adverse events that can cause severe morbidity, such as deafness, and in some instances can lead to death. Our aim was to estimate the absolute and relative frequency of adverse events associated with different tuberculosis drugs to provide useful information for clinicians and tuberculosis programmes in selecting optimal treatment regimens.
METHODS
We did a meta-analysis using individual-level patient data that were obtained from studies that reported adverse events that resulted in permanent discontinuation of anti-tuberculosis medications. We used a database created for our previous meta-analysis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment and outcomes, for which we did a systematic review of literature published between Jan 1, 2009, and Aug 31, 2015 (updated April 15, 2016), and requested individual patient-level information from authors. We also considered for this analysis studies contributing patient-level data in response to a public call made by WHO in 2018. Meta-analysis for proportions and arm-based network meta-analysis were done to estimate the incidence of adverse events for each tuberculosis drug.
FINDINGS
58 studies were identified, including 50 studies from the updated individual patient data meta-analysis for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. 35 of these studies, with 9178 patients, were included in our analysis. Using meta-analysis of proportions, drugs with low risks of adverse event occurrence leading to permanent discontinuation included levofloxacin (1·3% [95% CI 0·3-5·0]), moxifloxacin (2·9% [1·6-5·0]), bedaquiline (1·7% [0·7-4·2]), and clofazimine (1·6% [0·5-5·3]). Relatively high incidence of adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation was seen with three second-line injectable drugs (amikacin: 10·2% [6·3-16·0]; kanamycin: 7·5% [4·6-11·9]; capreomycin: 8·2% [6·3-10·7]), aminosalicylic acid (11·6% [7·1-18·3]), and linezolid (14·1% [9·9-19·6]). Risk of bias in selection of studies was judged to be low because there were no important differences between included and excluded studies. Variability between studies was significant for most outcomes analysed.
INTERPRETATION
Fluoroquinolones, clofazimine, and bedaquiline had the lowest incidence of adverse events leading to permanent drug discontinuation, whereas second-line injectable drugs, aminosalicylic acid, and linezolid had the highest incidence. These results suggest that close monitoring of adverse events is important for patients being treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Our results also underscore the urgent need for safer and better-tolerated drugs to reduce morbidity from treatment itself for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
FUNDING
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA), American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, and Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32192585
pii: S2213-2600(20)30047-3
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30047-3
pmc: PMC7384398
mid: NIHMS1609642
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antitubercular Agents
0
Diarylquinolines
0
Fluoroquinolones
0
Aminosalicylic Acid
5B2658E0N2
bedaquiline
78846I289Y
Clofazimine
D959AE5USF
Linezolid
ISQ9I6J12J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
383-394Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW007124
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
N Ahmad
(N)
P Baghaei
(P)
L Barkane
(L)
A Benedetti
(A)
S K Brode
(SK)
Jcm Brust
(J)
J R Campbell
(JR)
Vwl Chang
(V)
D Falzon
(D)
L Guglielmetti
(L)
P Isaakidis
(P)
R R Kempker
(RR)
M Kipiani
(M)
L Kuksa
(L)
Z Lan
(Z)
C Lange
(C)
R Laniado-Laborín
(R)
P Nahid
(P)
D Rodrigues
(D)
R Singla
(R)
Z F Udwadia
(ZF)
D Menzies
(D)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Eur Respir J. 2017 Nov 9;50(5):
pubmed: 29122917
ERJ Open Res. 2017 Jun 21;3(2):
pubmed: 28656130
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Nov 1;21(11):1114-1126
pubmed: 29037291
Comput Biol Chem. 2008 Feb;32(1):38-46
pubmed: 17988949
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 4;360(23):2397-405
pubmed: 19494215
Eur Respir J. 2016 Apr;47(4):1235-43
pubmed: 26965290
Eur Respir J. 2010 Sep;36(3):584-93
pubmed: 20185428
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Oct;17(10):1257-66
pubmed: 23735593
Eur Respir J. 2010 Apr;35(4):936-8; author reply 938-40
pubmed: 20356997
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):41-51
pubmed: 18083461
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Mar 12;17(3):373
pubmed: 26985890
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Jul 1;72(7):1871-1879
pubmed: 28419314
Eur Respir J. 2013 Jun;41(6):1393-400
pubmed: 23018916
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 Mar;14(3):275-81
pubmed: 20132617
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 02;4(1):e004143
pubmed: 24384902
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Nov;14(11):1700-6
pubmed: 18976552
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005 Jun;9(6):640-5
pubmed: 15971391
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2016 Jun 22;15(1):41
pubmed: 27334498
Eur Respir J. 2017 May 21;49(5):
pubmed: 28529205
Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 22;49(3):
pubmed: 28331044
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007 Dec;11(12):1314-20
pubmed: 18034952
Euro Surveill. 2013 Oct 03;18(40):
pubmed: 24128699
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e63057
pubmed: 23667572
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 May;19(5):525-30
pubmed: 25868019
Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1230-9
pubmed: 24439237
Arch Bronconeumol. 2015 Oct;51(10):e49-52
pubmed: 26026689
Am J Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):e521-30
pubmed: 24284652
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Nov;70(11):3127-33
pubmed: 26203184
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;19(3):416-24
pubmed: 23622055
Eur Respir J. 2012 Dec;40(6):1430-42
pubmed: 22496332
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 7;366(23):2151-60
pubmed: 22670901
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jun;67(6):1503-7
pubmed: 22403262
Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 22;49(3):
pubmed: 28331031
Eur Respir J. 2012 Apr;39(4):956-62
pubmed: 21965225
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012 Jul;16(7):891-6
pubmed: 22507895
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):821-834
pubmed: 30215381
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014 Jan;18(1):39-43
pubmed: 24365550
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Apr;65(4):775-83
pubmed: 20150181
J Stat Softw. 2017 Aug;80:
pubmed: 28883783
Microb Drug Resist. 2010 Mar;16(1):81-6
pubmed: 20192820
N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 18;367(16):1508-18
pubmed: 23075177
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Aug;17(8):1001-7
pubmed: 23541151
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Apr;19(4):406-12
pubmed: 25859995
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Apr;7(4):603-15
pubmed: 25973226
Eur Respir J. 2018 Mar 22;51(3):
pubmed: 29419439
Am J Ther. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):e29-34
pubmed: 20019591
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 21;371(8):723-32
pubmed: 25140958
PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001300
pubmed: 22952439
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Feb;68(2):284-93
pubmed: 23054996
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun 1;167(11):1472-7
pubmed: 12569078
Am J Ther. 2011 Sep;18(5):343-9
pubmed: 20535008
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 15;60(2):188-94
pubmed: 25320286
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 15;62(4):418-430
pubmed: 26508515
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Sep;19(9):1109-14, i-ii
pubmed: 26260834
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 29;12(12):e1001932
pubmed: 26714320
Eur Respir J. 2017 Mar 22;49(3):
pubmed: 28182570
Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Jun;21(6):1002-11
pubmed: 25988954
Eur Respir J. 2016 Jun;47(6):1758-66
pubmed: 27076583
BMJ. 2010 Feb 05;340:c221
pubmed: 20139215
Eur Respir J. 2016 Feb;47(2):564-74
pubmed: 26647431
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jul;57(7):3445-9
pubmed: 23650165
Eur Respir J. 2019 Dec 19;54(6):
pubmed: 31601711
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):246-62
pubmed: 24096635