HYPHYCA: a prospective study in 613 patients conducting a comprehensive analysis for predictive factors of physiological

18F-FDG Anal cancer PET Physiological uptake

Journal

EJNMMI research
ISSN: 2191-219X
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101560946

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 17 12 2019
accepted: 25 02 2020
entrez: 21 3 2020
pubmed: 21 3 2020
medline: 21 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Anal cancer is a relatively rare tumor of which incidence increases in developed countries. Over a 2-month period, patients aged 18 years old and more, referred for Six hundred and thirteen patients were included (sex ratio F/M = 0.99) and 545 (89%) questionnaires were entirely completed. Significantly more males presented anal canal hypermetabolism (sex ratio (M/F) = 1.18 versus 0.85, p = 0.048). Moreover, patients with anal canal hypermetabolism had higher BMI (27.6 (5.7) kg/m According to our study, the predictive factors of physiological anal canal hypermetabolism are high BMI, male gender, hemorrhoid history, and rectum filled with only feces. This may pave the way to a more specific interpretation of post radio-chemotherapy PET evaluations of anal canal cancer, provided that other studies are conducted in this specific population. This prospective study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT03506529; HYPHYCA on April 24, 2018.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Anal cancer is a relatively rare tumor of which incidence increases in developed countries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
Over a 2-month period, patients aged 18 years old and more, referred for
RESULTS RESULTS
Six hundred and thirteen patients were included (sex ratio F/M = 0.99) and 545 (89%) questionnaires were entirely completed. Significantly more males presented anal canal hypermetabolism (sex ratio (M/F) = 1.18 versus 0.85, p = 0.048). Moreover, patients with anal canal hypermetabolism had higher BMI (27.6 (5.7) kg/m
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
According to our study, the predictive factors of physiological anal canal hypermetabolism are high BMI, male gender, hemorrhoid history, and rectum filled with only feces. This may pave the way to a more specific interpretation of post radio-chemotherapy PET evaluations of anal canal cancer, provided that other studies are conducted in this specific population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
This prospective study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT03506529; HYPHYCA on April 24, 2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32193623
doi: 10.1186/s13550-020-0615-5
pii: 10.1186/s13550-020-0615-5
pmc: PMC7082447
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03506529']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

28

Références

Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jun;87(3):376-82
pubmed: 18453023
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(9):1414-1420
pubmed: 28280225
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Apr 30;25(2):189-204
pubmed: 30827084
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(11):3574-81
pubmed: 25652048
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(Suppl 1):17-31
pubmed: 28623376
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Nov;29(11):1393-9
pubmed: 25092560
J Clin Oncol. 1997 May;15(5):2040-9
pubmed: 9164216
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;26(2):201-10
pubmed: 21061012
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;27(2):215-20
pubmed: 21932016
Clin Nucl Med. 2015 Jan;40(1):e17-22
pubmed: 24873794
Br J Cancer. 2011 Aug 9;105(4):498-504
pubmed: 21792197
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54
pubmed: 25452219
Ann Nucl Med. 2010 Apr;24(3):157-61
pubmed: 20204552
Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1056):20150223
pubmed: 26395671
Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jan;2(1):A13
pubmed: 15670466
Sex Health. 2012 Dec;9(6):504-8
pubmed: 22958581
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jan;43(1):197-199
pubmed: 26475306
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jan;46(1):224-237
pubmed: 30350009
Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):539-48
pubmed: 24865311
Clin Nucl Med. 2013 Oct;38(10):e402-3
pubmed: 22996249
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Feb;43(2):249-258
pubmed: 26280981
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):66-72
pubmed: 22592047
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jun;45(6):941-950
pubmed: 29279943
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997 Sep;32(9):920-4
pubmed: 9299672
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Sep-Oct;6(5):e149-e154
pubmed: 26948134

Auteurs

Nicolas Aide (N)

Normandie University, Caen, France. aide-n@chu-caen.fr.
Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France. aide-n@chu-caen.fr.
INSERM 1086 ANTICIPE, Normandie University, Caen, France. aide-n@chu-caen.fr.

Laure-Eugénie Tainturier (LE)

Normandie University, Caen, France.
Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.

Cathy Nganoa (C)

Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.

Benjamin Houdu (B)

Nuclear Medicine Department, Caen University Hospital, Avenue Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.

Jennifer Kammerer (J)

Normandie University, Caen, France.
Radiation Oncology Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France.

Marie-Pierre Galais (MP)

Digestive Oncology Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France.

Renaud Ciappuccini (R)

Nuclear Medicine Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France.

Charline Lasnon (C)

INSERM 1086 ANTICIPE, Normandie University, Caen, France.
Nuclear Medicine Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France.

Classifications MeSH