Ixazomib-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: are real-world data compatible with clinical trial outcomes? A multi-site Israeli registry study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Boron Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Data Analysis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glycine
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Israel
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Myeloma
/ diagnosis
Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
/ methods
Recurrence
Registries
Treatment Outcome
Ixazomib
Myeloma
Real-world
Relapse
Journal
Annals of hematology
ISSN: 1432-0584
Titre abrégé: Ann Hematol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9107334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
05
08
2019
accepted:
01
03
2020
pubmed:
21
3
2020
medline:
2
6
2020
entrez:
21
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), has been approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, based on the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this all-oral triplet, compared with lenalidomide-dexamethasone. However, clinical trial outcomes do not always translate into real-world outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of ixazomib-based combination for treatment of patients with RRMM in a real-world setting. All consecutive RRMM patients who received at least one cycle of ixazomib-based treatment combination between June 2013 and June 2018 were identified. Data was extracted from medical charts focusing on demographics, disease characteristics, prior treatment, and responses. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. A total of 78 patients across 7 sites were retrospectively included. Median follow-up was 22 months. Median age was 68 (range 38-90). Sixty-four percent received ixazomib in 2nd line, 19% in 3rd line. Overall, 89% of patients had been exposed to PIs (bortezomib 87%) prior to IRd, 41% to IMiDs. Twenty-nine (48%, of 60 available) had high (t(4:14), t(14:16), del17p) or intermediate (+1q21) risk aberrations. Most patients (82%) received ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. An exploratory assessment for disease aggressiveness at diagnosis was classified by a treating physician as indolent (rapid control to protect from target organ damage not required) vs aggressive (imminent target organ damage) in 63% vs 37%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with a low discontinuation rate (11%). Median PFS on ixazomib therapy was 24 months (95% CI 17-30). PFS was 77% and 47% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Median OS was not reached; OS was 91% and 80% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Higher LDH, older age, and worse clinical aggressiveness were associated with worse PFS, whereas a deeper response to ixazomib (≥ VGPR) and a longer response to first-line bortezomib (≥ 24 m) were associated with an improved PFS on ixazomib. No effect on PFS was found for cytogenetic risk by FISH, ISS/rISS, and prior anti-myeloma treatment. Ixazomib-based combinations are efficacious and safe regimens in RRMM patients in the real-world setting, regardless to cytogenetic risk, with a PFS of 24 months comparable with clinical trial data. This regimen had most favorable outcomes among patients who remained progression-free more than 24 months after a bortezomib induction and for those who have a more indolent disease phenotype.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32193630
doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-03985-9
pii: 10.1007/s00277-020-03985-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Boron Compounds
0
ixazomib
71050168A2
Glycine
TE7660XO1C
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM