Diagnostic Accuracy of Thoracic Ultrasonography to Differentiate Transudative From Exudative Pleural Effusion.


Journal

Chest
ISSN: 1931-3543
Titre abrégé: Chest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0231335

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 28 10 2019
revised: 11 02 2020
accepted: 16 02 2020
pubmed: 21 3 2020
medline: 26 5 2021
entrez: 21 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There are limited data examining the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) in distinguishing transudative from exudative pleural effusions. What is the diagnostic accuracy of TUS in distinguishing transudative from exudative effusions in consecutive patients with pleural effusion? Consecutive patients who underwent TUS and subsequently a diagnostic thoracentesis with a pleural fluid analysis were identified. TUS images of the pleural effusions were interpreted by previously published criteria. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of TUS findings in predicting a transudative vs exudative pleural effusions and specific pleural diagnoses. We evaluated 300 consecutive pleural effusions in 285 patients. The pleural effusions were classified as exudative in 229 of 300 cases (76%). TUS showed anechoic effusions in 122 of 300 cases (40%) and complex effusions in 178 of 300 cases (60%). An anechoic appearance on TUS was associated with exudative effusions (68/122; 56%) as compared with transudative effusions (54/122; 44%). The presence of a complex-appearing effusion on TUS was highly predictive of an exudative effusion (positive predictive value of 90%). However, none of the four TUS characteristics were highly specific of a pleural diagnosis. Thoracic ultrasonography is inadequate to diagnose a transudative pleural effusion reliably. Although the TUS findings of a complex effusion may suggest an exudative pleural effusion, specific pleural diagnoses cannot be predicted confidently.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There are limited data examining the diagnostic accuracy of thoracic ultrasonography (TUS) in distinguishing transudative from exudative pleural effusions.
RESEARCH QUESTION
What is the diagnostic accuracy of TUS in distinguishing transudative from exudative effusions in consecutive patients with pleural effusion?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Consecutive patients who underwent TUS and subsequently a diagnostic thoracentesis with a pleural fluid analysis were identified. TUS images of the pleural effusions were interpreted by previously published criteria. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of TUS findings in predicting a transudative vs exudative pleural effusions and specific pleural diagnoses.
RESULTS
We evaluated 300 consecutive pleural effusions in 285 patients. The pleural effusions were classified as exudative in 229 of 300 cases (76%). TUS showed anechoic effusions in 122 of 300 cases (40%) and complex effusions in 178 of 300 cases (60%). An anechoic appearance on TUS was associated with exudative effusions (68/122; 56%) as compared with transudative effusions (54/122; 44%). The presence of a complex-appearing effusion on TUS was highly predictive of an exudative effusion (positive predictive value of 90%). However, none of the four TUS characteristics were highly specific of a pleural diagnosis.
INTERPRETATION
Thoracic ultrasonography is inadequate to diagnose a transudative pleural effusion reliably. Although the TUS findings of a complex effusion may suggest an exudative pleural effusion, specific pleural diagnoses cannot be predicted confidently.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32194059
pii: S0012-3692(20)30465-7
doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.051
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

692-697

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Boris Shkolnik (B)

Departments of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

Marc A Judson (MA)

Departments of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

Adam Austin (A)

Departments of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

Kurt Hu (K)

Departments of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

Melissa D'Souza (M)

Departments of Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

Alexis Zumbrunn (A)

Departments of Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY.

John T Huggins (JT)

Ralph H.Johnson VA Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Recai Yucel (R)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, SUNY-Albany, NY.

Amit Chopra (A)

Departments of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY. Electronic address: chopraa1@mail.amc.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH