Reformulating and Mirroring in Psychotherapy: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.

RCT cognitive-behavioral therapy conversation analysis mirroring psychodynamic therapy psychotherapy process research reformulating

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 30 09 2019
accepted: 10 02 2020
entrez: 21 3 2020
pubmed: 21 3 2020
medline: 21 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The conversational actions of reformulating and mirroring constitute some of the core intervention techniques of psychotherapy. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the way in which therapists in cognitive-behavioral (CBT) and psychodynamic therapy (PDT) use reformulating and mirroring strategies to return patients' prior talk and how their differential usage can be viewed in light of the respective manualized recommendations. A mixed methods approach was applied using qualitative data that derived from a RCT. The data collection consisted of 200 excerpts assembled from both treatment conditions. The method of Conversation Analysis was used to determine the practices that accomplished instances of reformulating and mirroring, and to examine their distinct implications for subsequent talk. The quantitative analysis revealed that cognitive-behavioral therapists are significantly more likely to use reformulations, which is in harmony with what is suggested in CBT's treatment manuals. Psychodynamic therapists' frequent use of transformative formulations is, by contrast, unexpected in regard to the suggestions of the treatment protocol, as these interventions steer toward topical closure. Compared to the CBT condition, psychodynamic therapists were still significantly more likely to rely on mirroring strategies, which

Identifiants

pubmed: 32194480
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00318
pmc: PMC7066200
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

318

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Knol, Huiskes, Koole, Meganck, Loeys and Desmet.

Références

Trials. 2017 Mar 14;18(1):126
pubmed: 28292331
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Nov;74(11):1889-1906
pubmed: 30334258
Psychol Bull. 2004 Jul;130(4):631-63
pubmed: 15250817
J Affect Disord. 2014 Dec;169:128-43
pubmed: 25194781
World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):287-288
pubmed: 27717255

Auteurs

A S L Knol (ASL)

Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Mike Huiskes (M)

Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Tom Koole (T)

Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Health Communication Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Reitske Meganck (R)

Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Tom Loeys (T)

Department of Data-analysis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Mattias Desmet (M)

Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH