Standalone lordotic endoscopic wedge lumbar interbody fusion (LEW-LIF™) with a threaded cylindrical peek cage: report of two cases.

Intervertebral disc hernia endoscopic lumbar fusion

Journal

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)
ISSN: 2414-469X
Titre abrégé: J Spine Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101685460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez: 21 3 2020
pubmed: 21 3 2020
medline: 21 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We report two cases of a standalone lordotic endoscopic wedge lumbar interbody fusion (LEW-LIF™) with a stress-neutral non-expandable cylindrical threaded polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody fusion implant. Patients underwent full-endoscopic transforaminal decompression and fusion for symptomatic lateral recess stenosis due to disc herniation, and hypertrophy of the facet joint complex and ligamentum flavum and no more than grade I spondylolisthesis. Lumbar interbody fusion with cages traditionally calls for posterior supplemental fixation with pedicle screws for added stability. A more simplified version of lumbar decompression and fusion without pedicle screws would allow treating patients suffering from stenosis and instability induced sciatica-type low back and leg pain in an outpatient ambulatory surgery center setting (ASC). This would realize a significant reduction in cost as well as the burden to the patient with decreased postoperative pain and earlier return to function. A 62-year-old female patient had surgery at L4/5 for a 6-year history of worsening right sided sciatica-type leg- and low back pain. Another 79-year-old female had the same surgical management at L4/5 for a 5-year history of unrelenting left-sided spondylolisthesis-related symptoms. Both patients had an uneventful postoperative course until the last available follow-up of 24 weeks with greater than 60% VAS and Oswestry disability index (ODI) reductions. There was no evidence of implant expulsion, subsidence, or postoperative instability. We concluded that standalone outpatient lumbar transforaminal endoscopic interbody fusion with a non-expandable threaded cylindrical cage is feasible, and favorable clinical outcomes provide proof of concept to study long-term clinical outcomes in larger groups of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32195434
doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.06.09
pii: jss-06-S1-S275
pmc: PMC7063321
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

S275-S284

Informations de copyright

2020 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: The first author and his team of co-authors designed and marketed the standalone clyndrical interbody fusion cage and receive royalties and distributions from the sale of their product by Ortomac. Additional indirect conflicts of interest may exist due to honoraria, consultancies to other vendors and companies including Elliquence, LLC. The senior author has no direct or indirect conflicts and his involvement in this manuscript is not meant for or intended to endorse any products or push any other agenda other than the associated clinical outcomes with endoscopic standalone lumbar fusion. The senior author’s motive for assisting in the surgeries of the two patients involved in this case report and in the compilation of this clinically relevant information is by no means created and/or correlated to directly enrich anyone due to its publication. This publication was intended to substantiate contemporary endoscopic spinal surgery concepts to facilitate technology advancements.

Références

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Aug;162:211-219
pubmed: 29903488
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:596-606.e1
pubmed: 30954733
Orthop Clin North Am. 2003 Apr;34(2):281-95
pubmed: 12914268
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):E890-7
pubmed: 17108817
Eur Spine J. 2019 Jan;28(1):55-60
pubmed: 30099670
Neurospine. 2019 Mar;16(1):82-95
pubmed: 30943710
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):295-299
pubmed: 28089666
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 May;16(5):373-380
pubmed: 31044627
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Sep;31:23-9
pubmed: 27349468
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):687-695
pubmed: 30215589
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1976 Aug;15(3):185-7
pubmed: 968347
Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:130-4
pubmed: 26361455
J Neurosurg. 1996 Mar;84(3):462-7
pubmed: 8609559
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:23-29
pubmed: 28736113
Neurospine. 2019 Mar;16(1):52-62
pubmed: 30943707
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Apr;22(2):122-9
pubmed: 19342934
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952
pubmed: 11074683
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2017 Oct;48:30-34
pubmed: 28719806
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 4;98(45):3711-3715
pubmed: 30526785
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Jun 15;59(6):222-230
pubmed: 31068542

Auteurs

Jorge Felipe Ramírez León (JF)

Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.
Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN-Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia.

Álvaro Silva Ardila (ÁS)

Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.

José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz (JG)

Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.
Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN-Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia.

Carolina Ramírez Martínez (CR)

Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.
Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión, CECIMIN-Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogotá, Colombia.

Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar (GO)

Research Team, Centro de Columna, Bogotá, Colombia.

Jefferson Infante (J)

Ortomac, Bogotá, Colombia.

Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski (KU)

Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona, Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Classifications MeSH