Sex differences in complications and readmission rates following shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.
Shoulder arthroplasty
perioperative complications
readmissions
reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
sex differences
total shoulder arthroplasty
Journal
JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
21
3
2020
pubmed:
21
3
2020
medline:
21
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Shoulder arthroplasty (SA) procedures are increasingly performed in the United States. However, there is a lack of data evaluating how patient sex may affect perioperative complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sex-based differences in 30-day postoperative complication and readmission rates after SA. Total SA and reverse SA cases between 2012-2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The 30-day complication rate, readmission rate, operation time, length of stay, and mortality were compared between women and men. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent perioperative complications associated with patient sex. Of 12,530 SA cases, 6949 (55.4%) were female and 5499 (44.5%) were male. Compared with women, on average men were significantly younger, had lower body mass index, and were less likely to be functionally dependent, and less likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3+ ( Though the overall complication risk is similar between the sexes, their risk profiles are distinct. Men had decreased risk of UTI, blood transfusions, and shorter length of stay but increased risk of surgical site and longer operating time compared with women. This disparity should be discussed when counseling and risk-stratifying patients for SA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32195469
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2019.11.007
pii: S2666-6383(19)30007-6
pmc: PMC7075761
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
95-99Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Author(s).
Références
Int Orthop. 2018 Jan;42(1):149-155
pubmed: 28689309
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Dec;85(12):2318-24
pubmed: 14668500
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Oct;221(4):828-36
pubmed: 26299570
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2249-54
pubmed: 22258770
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Oct;75(5):524-32
pubmed: 15513482
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Mar;24(3):460-7
pubmed: 25441557
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Oct;88(10):2279-92
pubmed: 17015609
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):754-9
pubmed: 25591461
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Sep/Oct;45(6):E386-E392
pubmed: 27737300
Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):653-658
pubmed: 30076444
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):225-30
pubmed: 19119020
Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):491-507
pubmed: 9790339
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Apr;78(4):603-16
pubmed: 8609143
J Clin Anesth. 2010 Jun;22(4):233-6
pubmed: 20522350
World J Surg. 2014 Jun;38(6):1461-7
pubmed: 24407939
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996 Jan-Feb;5(1):53-61
pubmed: 8919443
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2866
pubmed: 26937919
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1187-94
pubmed: 24503522
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):1423-1431
pubmed: 28190669
J Card Surg. 2010 May;25(3):267-71
pubmed: 20202035
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):407-15
pubmed: 24951282
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1574-81
pubmed: 24706043
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jun;26(6):1058-1063
pubmed: 28131689
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2099-105
pubmed: 25524429
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2370-2374
pubmed: 28366312
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1022-5
pubmed: 18451394
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Mar;9(1):49-53
pubmed: 26791172
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):91-7
pubmed: 25440519
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Sep;25(9):1404-11
pubmed: 27052271
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):420-7
pubmed: 23332220
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;14(6):599-601
pubmed: 16337526