Influence of the Acetabular Cup Material on the Shell Deformation and Strain Distribution in the Adjacent Bone-A Finite Element Analysis.

bone stock ceramics implant deformation modular acetabular cup poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) strain distribution titanium ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMW-PE)

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 16 01 2020
revised: 06 03 2020
accepted: 13 03 2020
entrez: 22 3 2020
pubmed: 22 3 2020
medline: 22 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In total hip arthroplasty, excessive acetabular cup deformations and altered strain distribution in the adjacent bone are potential risk factors for implant loosening. Materials with reduced stiffness might alter the strain distribution less, whereas shell and liner deformations might increase. The purpose of our current computational study was to evaluate whether carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketones with a Young´s modulus of 15 GPa (CFR-PEEK-15) and 23 GPa (CFR-PEEK-23) might be an alternative shell material compared to titanium in terms of shell and liner deformation, as well as strain distribution in the adjacent bone. Using a finite element analysis, the press-fit implantation of modular acetabular cups with shells made of titanium, CFR-PEEK-15 and CFR-PEEK-23 in a human hemi-pelvis model was simulated. Liners made of ceramic and polyethylene were simulated. Radial shell and liner deformations as well as strain distributions were analyzed. The shells made of CFR-PEEK-15 were deformed most (266.7 µm), followed by CFR-PEEK-23 (136.5 µm) and titanium (54.0 µm). Subsequently, the ceramic liners were radially deformed by up to 4.4 µm and the polyethylene liners up to 184.7 µm. The shell materials slightly influenced the strain distribution in the adjacent bone with CFR-PEEK, resulting in less strain in critical regions (<400 µm/m or >3000 µm/m) and more strain in bone building or sustaining regions (400 to 3000 µm/m), while the liner material only had a minor impact. The superior biomechanical properties of the acetabular shells made of CFR-PEEK could not be determined in our present study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32197478
pii: ma13061372
doi: 10.3390/ma13061372
pmc: PMC7142599
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003 Dec;275(2):1081-101
pubmed: 14613308
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Oct;17(7):926-35
pubmed: 12375254
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Oct;59(7):954-62
pubmed: 561786
Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1215-25
pubmed: 22419869
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008 Apr;222(3):273-83
pubmed: 18491697
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006 Feb;220(2):299-309
pubmed: 16669396
Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Apr;71(2):111-21
pubmed: 10852315
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct;467(10):2651-5
pubmed: 19582522
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Aug;18(5):658-61
pubmed: 12934222
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Feb;23(2):135-46
pubmed: 17931759
Calcif Tissue Int. 1993;53 Suppl 1:S68-74
pubmed: 8275382
J Orthop Res. 2013 Mar;31(3):485-92
pubmed: 23097319
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88(4):780-7
pubmed: 16595468
Int Orthop. 2012 May;36(5):955-60
pubmed: 22012573
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Apr;32:257-269
pubmed: 24508712
Int Orthop. 2018 Feb;42(2):303-309
pubmed: 28681227
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 May;101(4):591-8
pubmed: 23281249
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2016 Apr;230(4):259-64
pubmed: 26888887
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Jun;23(6):1533-42
pubmed: 22454139
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:600-608
pubmed: 29096126
Med Eng Phys. 2007 May;29(4):465-71
pubmed: 16901743
Biomaterials. 2010 May;31(13):3465-70
pubmed: 20153890
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2007 Aug;52(4):301-7
pubmed: 17691864
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Mar;18(2):264-70
pubmed: 23377753
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2002;216(4):237-45
pubmed: 12206520
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Oct 1;140(10):
pubmed: 30029239
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jan;23(1):151-5
pubmed: 18165046
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018 Oct;232(10):1030-1038
pubmed: 30183510
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):402-9
pubmed: 22125246
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Jul;95(1):23-30
pubmed: 19231021
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155612
pubmed: 27195789
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):403-9
pubmed: 22948528
J Biomech Eng. 2005 Jun;127(3):364-73
pubmed: 16060343
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jun;470(6):1705-10
pubmed: 22383019
J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 Feb;27(2):167-75
pubmed: 8436573
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006 Feb;220(2):311-9
pubmed: 16669397
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Feb;466(2):353-8
pubmed: 18196417
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:246-53
pubmed: 17006368
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Feb;89(2):174-9
pubmed: 17322430
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Mar;31:55-67
pubmed: 23466283
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun;25(4):644-53
pubmed: 19493649
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 May;19(4):362-9
pubmed: 15109756
J Biomech. 2012 Feb 23;45(4):719-23
pubmed: 22236529
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Apr;83(4):529-36
pubmed: 11315781
Med Eng Phys. 2004 Jan;26(1):61-9
pubmed: 14644599
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan;77(1):111-7
pubmed: 7822342
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 May;458:106-10
pubmed: 17179781
Int Orthop. 2011 Aug;35(8):1131-7
pubmed: 20625898
J Orthop Res. 2009 Nov;27(11):1467-72
pubmed: 19489047
Indian J Orthop. 2016 Jan-Feb;50(1):10-5
pubmed: 26952027
Bone Joint J. 2015 Apr;97-B(4):473-7
pubmed: 25820884
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Jun;14(4):426-31
pubmed: 10428222
J Biomech. 1997 Jun;30(6):639-42
pubmed: 9165399
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Aug;25(5):741-7
pubmed: 19473807
J Biomech. 2014 Oct 17;47(13):3303-9
pubmed: 25218504
Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20(2):65-75
pubmed: 20592444
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2016 Jan;230(1):4-12
pubmed: 26511269
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):1041-9
pubmed: 25543010
Hip Int. 2012 Nov-Dec;22(6):598-606
pubmed: 23233172

Auteurs

Danny Vogel (D)

Biomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Matthias Klimek (M)

Biomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Michael Saemann (M)

Biomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Rainer Bader (R)

Biomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany.

Classifications MeSH