Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up: Results of the French section of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).


Journal

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie
ISSN: 1166-7087
Titre abrégé: Prog Urol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9307844

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 20 01 2020
revised: 16 02 2020
accepted: 18 02 2020
pubmed: 22 3 2020
medline: 12 5 2021
entrez: 22 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) mortality results were reported for 7 European countries (excluding France) and showed a significant reduction in Prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. As those results have not been part of the global ERSPC results, it is of interest to report PCa mortality at a median follow-up of 9 years for French section of ERSPC. Two administrative departments were involved in the study. Only men after randomization in the screening group were invited by mail to be screened by PSA testing with two rounds at 4-6 year intervals. Biopsy was recommended if PSA>=3.0 ng/mL. No information other that the French Association of Urology recommandations on the use of PSA was offered to the control group (own decision of physicians and patients). Follow up was based on cancer registry database. Contamination defined as the receipt of PSA testing in control arm was measured. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the Rate Ratio (RR) of PCa mortality and incidence in the screening vs. control arm. Starting from 2003, 80,696 men aged 55-69 years were included. The percentage of men in the screening arm with at least one PSA test (compliance) was 31%. Compared to the control arm, PCa incidence increased by 10% in the screening arm (RR=1.10; 95% CI=[1.04-1.16], P=0.001), but PCa mortality did not differ (0.222 and 0.215 deaths/1000 person-years; RR=1.03[0.75-1.42], P=0.9). Limitations include low participation rate. PSA testing in the control arm was observed in 32% of men (contamination). Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up. 3.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32197936
pii: S1166-7087(20)30056-7
doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.02.011
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

252-260

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

A Villers (A)

Department of Urology, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France. Electronic address: arnauld.villers@wanadoo.fr.

F Bessaoud (F)

Hérault cancer registry, ICM Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

B Trétarre (B)

Hérault cancer registry, ICM Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

P Grosclaude (P)

Tarn cancer registry, Albi, Toulouse, France.

B Malavaud (B)

Department of Urology, University Toulouse, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

X Rebillard (X)

Department of Urology, Clinique Beau Soleil, Montpellier, France.

F Iborra (F)

Department of Urology, University Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

L Daubisse (L)

Hérault cancer registry, ICM Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

S Malavaud (S)

Department of Public Health, University Toulouse, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

M Roobol (M)

Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

E A Heijnsdijk (EA)

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

H J de Koning (HJ)

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

J Hugosson (J)

Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.

P Rischmann (P)

Department of Urology, University Toulouse, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

M Soulié (M)

Department of Urology, University Toulouse, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH