Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Two-Year Results.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Choroidal Neovascularization
/ diagnosis
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Middle Aged
Ranibizumab
/ therapeutic use
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Wet Macular Degeneration
/ diagnosis
Journal
Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
24
03
2012
revised:
29
03
2012
accepted:
29
03
2012
entrez:
24
3
2020
pubmed:
24
3
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe effects of ranibizumab and bevacizumab when administered monthly or as needed for 2 years and to describe the impact of switching to as-needed treatment after 1 year of monthly treatment. Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Patients (n = 1107) who were followed up during year 2 among 1185 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who were enrolled in the clinical trial. At enrollment, patients were assigned to 4 treatment groups defined by drug (ranibizumab or bevacizumab) and dosing regimen (monthly or as needed). At 1 year, patients initially assigned to monthly treatment were reassigned randomly to monthly or as-needed treatment, without changing the drug assignment. Mean change in visual acuity. Among patients following the same regimen for 2 years, mean gain in visual acuity was similar for both drugs (bevacizumab-ranibizumab difference, -1.4 letters; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.7 to 0.8; P = 0.21). Mean gain was greater for monthly than for as-needed treatment (difference, -2.4 letters; 95% CI, -4.8 to -0.1; P = 0.046). The proportion without fluid ranged from 13.9% in the bevacizumab-as-needed group to 45.5% in the ranibizumab monthly group (drug, P = 0.0003; regimen, P < 0.0001). Switching from monthly to as-needed treatment resulted in greater mean decrease in vision during year 2 (-2.2 letters; P = 0.03) and a lower proportion without fluid (-19%; P < 0.0001). Rates of death and arteriothrombotic events were similar for both drugs (P > 0.60). The proportion of patients with 1 or more systemic serious adverse events was higher with bevacizumab than ranibizumab (39.9% vs. 31.7%; adjusted risk ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57; P = 0.009). Most of the excess events have not been associated previously with systemic therapy targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Ranibizumab and bevacizumab had similar effects on visual acuity over a 2-year period. Treatment as needed resulted in less gain in visual acuity, whether instituted at enrollment or after 1 year of monthly treatment. There were no differences between drugs in rates of death or arteriothrombotic events. The interpretation of the persistence of higher rates of serious adverse events with bevacizumab is uncertain because of the lack of specificity to conditions associated with inhibition of VEGF. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32200813
pii: S0161-6420(20)30072-5
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.029
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
VEGFA protein, human
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Types de publication
Classical Article
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S135-S145Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY017823
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY017825
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY017826
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY017828
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.