ARCTIC: durvalumab with or without tremelimumab as third-line or later treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.


Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 31 10 2019
revised: 04 02 2020
accepted: 12 02 2020
pubmed: 24 3 2020
medline: 7 1 2021
entrez: 24 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) experience disease progression after first- and second-line treatment; more treatment options are required for these patients. ARCTIC, a phase III, randomized, open-label study, assessed durvalumab ± tremelimumab versus standard of care (SoC) as ≥ third-line treatment of mNSCLC. ARCTIC comprised two independent sub-studies. Study A: 126 patients with ≥25% of tumor cells (TCs) expressing programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) were randomized (1 : 1) to durvalumab [up to 12 months 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w)] or SoC. Study B: 469 patients with PD-L1 TC <25% were randomized (3 : 2 : 2 : 1) to durvalumab + tremelimumab (12 weeks durvalumab 20 mg/kg + tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w then 34 weeks durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), SoC, durvalumab (up to 12 months 10 mg/kg q2w), or tremelimumab (24 weeks 10 mg/kg q4w then 24 weeks q12w). Primary end points: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for durvalumab versus SoC (study A; descriptive only) and durvalumab + tremelimumab versus SoC (study B). Study A: median OS 11.7 (durvalumab) versus 6.8 (SoC) months {hazard ratio (HR) 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.93]}; median PFS 3.8 (durvalumab) versus 2.2 (SoC) months [HR 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49-1.04)]. Study B: median OS 11.5 (durvalumab + tremelimumab) versus 8.7 (SoC) months [HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61-1.05); P = 0.109]. Median PFS of 3.5 months for both groups [HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.01); P = 0.056]. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events: 9.7% (durvalumab) and 44.4% (SoC; study A) and 22.0% (durvalumab + tremelimumab) and 36.4% (SoC; study B). In heavily pretreated patients with mNSCLC, durvalumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS versus SoC (patients with PD-L1 TC ≥25%); numerical improvements in OS and PFS for durvalumab + tremelimumab versus SoC were observed (patients with PD-L1 TC <25%). Safety profiles were consistent with previous studies. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02352948.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Many patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) experience disease progression after first- and second-line treatment; more treatment options are required for these patients. ARCTIC, a phase III, randomized, open-label study, assessed durvalumab ± tremelimumab versus standard of care (SoC) as ≥ third-line treatment of mNSCLC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
ARCTIC comprised two independent sub-studies. Study A: 126 patients with ≥25% of tumor cells (TCs) expressing programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) were randomized (1 : 1) to durvalumab [up to 12 months 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w)] or SoC. Study B: 469 patients with PD-L1 TC <25% were randomized (3 : 2 : 2 : 1) to durvalumab + tremelimumab (12 weeks durvalumab 20 mg/kg + tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w then 34 weeks durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), SoC, durvalumab (up to 12 months 10 mg/kg q2w), or tremelimumab (24 weeks 10 mg/kg q4w then 24 weeks q12w). Primary end points: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for durvalumab versus SoC (study A; descriptive only) and durvalumab + tremelimumab versus SoC (study B).
RESULTS
Study A: median OS 11.7 (durvalumab) versus 6.8 (SoC) months {hazard ratio (HR) 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.93]}; median PFS 3.8 (durvalumab) versus 2.2 (SoC) months [HR 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49-1.04)]. Study B: median OS 11.5 (durvalumab + tremelimumab) versus 8.7 (SoC) months [HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61-1.05); P = 0.109]. Median PFS of 3.5 months for both groups [HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.01); P = 0.056]. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events: 9.7% (durvalumab) and 44.4% (SoC; study A) and 22.0% (durvalumab + tremelimumab) and 36.4% (SoC; study B).
CONCLUSIONS
In heavily pretreated patients with mNSCLC, durvalumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS versus SoC (patients with PD-L1 TC ≥25%); numerical improvements in OS and PFS for durvalumab + tremelimumab versus SoC were observed (patients with PD-L1 TC <25%). Safety profiles were consistent with previous studies.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02352948.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32201234
pii: S0923-7534(20)36041-5
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.02.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal 0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
durvalumab 28X28X9OKV
tremelimumab QEN1X95CIX

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02352948']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

609-618

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure DP has served in an advisory role and provided consultancy or lectures for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, and Roche, has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Peer CME, and Roche, has undertaken clinical trials research for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, MedImmune, Sanofi-Aventis, Taiho Pharma, Novocure, and Daiichi Sankyo, and has received travel/accommodation/expenses from AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, prIME Oncology, and Pfizer. NR reports personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffmann La-Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer, personal fees from MSD Sharp & Dohme and Takeda, and non-financial support from AbbVie, all outside the submitted work. SS has received lecture fees and research grants from AstraZeneca. DM-M has served as a speaker and advisory board member for Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, and Pierre-Fabre. SN reports speakers’ bureau/advisory work for Eli Lilly, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Bayer, and AbbVie. YT has received research funding from Taiho, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, and Kyowa Hakko Kirin. RS has served as an advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Taiho, Takeda, and Yuhan, and has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer-Ingelheim. SLG has received non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, and Novartis, and research grants from Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. RM, US, and PS are full-time employees of AstraZeneca. MP was a contractor for AstraZeneca at the time of the study. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

D Planchard (D)

Gustave Roussy, Department of Medical Oncology, Thoracic Group, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: David.PLANCHARD@gustaveroussy.fr.

N Reinmuth (N)

Asklepios Lung Clinic, Munich-Gauting, Germany.

S Orlov (S)

Pavlov State Medical University, St Petersburg, Russia.

J R Fischer (JR)

Lungenklinik Loewenstein, Löwenstein, Germany.

S Sugawara (S)

Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan.

S Mandziuk (S)

Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

D Marquez-Medina (D)

Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain.

S Novello (S)

Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Luigi, Orbassano, Italy.

Y Takeda (Y)

National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

R Soo (R)

National University Hospital, Singapore.

K Park (K)

Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

M McCleod (M)

Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, USA.

S L Geater (SL)

Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

M Powell (M)

AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA.

R May (R)

AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA.

U Scheuring (U)

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.

P Stockman (P)

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.

D Kowalski (D)

Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH