Impact of the antidepressant citalopram on the behaviour of two different life stages of brown trout.

Antidepressant Behaviour Brown trout Citalopram Corisol Fish Pharmaceutical Stress hormone

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 12 12 2019
accepted: 17 02 2020
entrez: 24 3 2020
pubmed: 24 3 2020
medline: 24 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Over the last two decades, there has been a constant increase in prescription rates of antidepressants. In parallel, neuroactive pharmaceuticals are making their way into aquatic environments at increasing concentrations. Among the antidepressants detected in the environment citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is one of the most commonly found. Given citalopram is specifically designed to alter mood and behaviour in humans, there is growing concern it can adversely affect the behaviour on non-target wildlife. In our study, brown trout were exposed to citalopram (nominal concentrations: 1, 10, 100, 1000 µg/L) in two different life stages. Larvae were exposed at 7 and 11 °C from the eyed ova stage until 8 weeks post yolk sac consumption, and juvenile brown trout were exposed for 4 weeks at 7 °C. At both stages we measured mortality, weight, length, tissue citalopram concentration, behaviour during exposure and behaviour in a stressfull environment. For brown trout larvae additionally hatching rate and heart rate, and for juvenile brown trout the tissue cortisol concentration were assessed. During the exposure, both larvae and juvenile fish exposed to the highest test concentration of citalopram (1 mg/L) had higher swimming activity and spent longer in the upper part of the aquaria compared to control fish, which is an indicator for decreased anxiety. Most probably due to the higher swimming activity during the exposure, the juveniles and larvae exposed to 1 mg/L citalopram showed decreased weight and length. Additionally, in a stressful artificial swimming measurement device, brown trout larvae displayed the anxiolytic effect of the antidepressant by reduced swimming activity during this stress situation, already at concentrations of 100 µg/L citalopram. Chemical analysis of the tissue revealed rising citalopram tissue concentrations with rising exposure concentrations. Tissue concentrations were 10 times higher in juvenile fish compared to brown trout larvae. Fish plasma concentrations were calculated, which exceeded human therapeutic levels for the highest exposure concentration, matching the behavioural results. Developmental parameters like hatching rate and heart rate, as well as mortality and tissue cortisol content were unaffected by the antidepressant. Overall, we could trace the pharmacological mode of action of the antidepressant citalopram in the non-target organism brown trout in two different life stages.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Over the last two decades, there has been a constant increase in prescription rates of antidepressants. In parallel, neuroactive pharmaceuticals are making their way into aquatic environments at increasing concentrations. Among the antidepressants detected in the environment citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is one of the most commonly found. Given citalopram is specifically designed to alter mood and behaviour in humans, there is growing concern it can adversely affect the behaviour on non-target wildlife.
METHODS METHODS
In our study, brown trout were exposed to citalopram (nominal concentrations: 1, 10, 100, 1000 µg/L) in two different life stages. Larvae were exposed at 7 and 11 °C from the eyed ova stage until 8 weeks post yolk sac consumption, and juvenile brown trout were exposed for 4 weeks at 7 °C. At both stages we measured mortality, weight, length, tissue citalopram concentration, behaviour during exposure and behaviour in a stressfull environment. For brown trout larvae additionally hatching rate and heart rate, and for juvenile brown trout the tissue cortisol concentration were assessed.
RESULTS RESULTS
During the exposure, both larvae and juvenile fish exposed to the highest test concentration of citalopram (1 mg/L) had higher swimming activity and spent longer in the upper part of the aquaria compared to control fish, which is an indicator for decreased anxiety. Most probably due to the higher swimming activity during the exposure, the juveniles and larvae exposed to 1 mg/L citalopram showed decreased weight and length. Additionally, in a stressful artificial swimming measurement device, brown trout larvae displayed the anxiolytic effect of the antidepressant by reduced swimming activity during this stress situation, already at concentrations of 100 µg/L citalopram. Chemical analysis of the tissue revealed rising citalopram tissue concentrations with rising exposure concentrations. Tissue concentrations were 10 times higher in juvenile fish compared to brown trout larvae. Fish plasma concentrations were calculated, which exceeded human therapeutic levels for the highest exposure concentration, matching the behavioural results. Developmental parameters like hatching rate and heart rate, as well as mortality and tissue cortisol content were unaffected by the antidepressant. Overall, we could trace the pharmacological mode of action of the antidepressant citalopram in the non-target organism brown trout in two different life stages.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32201650
doi: 10.7717/peerj.8765
pii: 8765
pmc: PMC7073243
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e8765

Informations de copyright

©2020 Ziegler et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Références

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016 Apr;35(4):966-74
pubmed: 26587912
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008 Feb;54(2):325-30
pubmed: 17763886
Aquat Toxicol. 2015 Jan;158:165-70
pubmed: 25438122
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;58(3):516-23
pubmed: 20816909
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994 Mar;9 Suppl 1:19-26
pubmed: 8021435
J Chromatogr A. 2006 May 19;1115(1-2):187-95
pubmed: 16574138
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 1;42(15):5807-13
pubmed: 18754513
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Dec;28(12):2522-7
pubmed: 19449981
Aquat Toxicol. 2014 Jun;151:84-7
pubmed: 24380369
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2004 May;46(4):511-7
pubmed: 15253049
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2016 May;35(5):1297-309
pubmed: 26399705
Aquat Toxicol. 2017 Nov;192:274-283
pubmed: 28992598
Water Res. 2017 Nov 1;124:654-662
pubmed: 28825984
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Jul;28(7):1372-9
pubmed: 19245273
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2007 Nov-Dec;29(6):652-64
pubmed: 17761399
Neurochem Res. 2018 Jun;43(6):1191-1199
pubmed: 29740748
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;634:1136-1147
pubmed: 29660870
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Jan 15;47(2):661-77
pubmed: 23227929
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;607-608:1026-1036
pubmed: 28724221
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 15;573:164-177
pubmed: 27560998
Int J Comp Psychol. 2010 Jan 1;23(1):43-61
pubmed: 20523756
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2017 Jul;62:27-33
pubmed: 28438663
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;61(3):261-75
pubmed: 21889559
Aquat Toxicol. 2014 Jun;151:97-104
pubmed: 24630159
Ther Drug Monit. 2003 Oct;25(5):600-8
pubmed: 14508384
Ecotoxicology. 2018 Jan;27(1):12-22
pubmed: 29058178
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 15;490:279-87
pubmed: 24858225
Electrophoresis. 2006 Mar;27(5-6):1220-6
pubmed: 16440399
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 15;44(6):1918-25
pubmed: 20121081
Environ Pollut. 2019 Nov;254(Pt A):112999
pubmed: 31404734
J Hazard Mater. 2011 Mar 15;187(1-3):596-9
pubmed: 21300431
Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jan;62(1):135-43
pubmed: 21843537
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Jan 15;503-504:133-41
pubmed: 24908335
Nat Protoc. 2010 Feb;5(2):209-16
pubmed: 20134420
J Chromatogr A. 2010 Oct 15;1217(42):6511-21
pubmed: 20832069
Physiol Behav. 2003 Sep;79(4-5):719-24
pubmed: 12954414
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009 Dec;28(12):2677-84
pubmed: 19405782
Aquat Toxicol. 2017 Feb;183:38-45
pubmed: 27988417
Environ Pollut. 2017 Mar;222:592-599
pubmed: 28063712
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D930-D936
pubmed: 29140522
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Sep 30;148(3):751-5
pubmed: 17706342
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 1;488-489:46-50
pubmed: 24814035
Aquat Toxicol. 2010 Oct 1;100(1):128-37
pubmed: 20692053
Aquat Toxicol. 2016 Apr;173:19-28
pubmed: 26827268
Environ Res. 2015 Nov;143(Pt B):56-64
pubmed: 26409498

Auteurs

Michael Ziegler (M)

Animal Physiolgical Ecology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Sarah Knoll (S)

Effect-based Environmental Analysis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Heinz-R Köhler (HR)

Animal Physiolgical Ecology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Selina Tisler (S)

Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Carolin Huhn (C)

Effect-based Environmental Analysis, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Christian Zwiener (C)

Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Rita Triebskorn (R)

Animal Physiolgical Ecology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Steinbeis Transfer Center for Ecotoxicology and Ecophysiology, Rottenburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH