[The patient in clinical research: disposable guinea pig or involved actor?]

Il paziente nella ricerca clinica: cavia a disposizione o attore interessato?

Journal

Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006)
ISSN: 1972-6481
Titre abrégé: G Ital Cardiol (Rome)
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101263411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez: 24 3 2020
pubmed: 24 3 2020
medline: 2 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The request for informed consent to join a clinical trial often creates mistrust and hesitation in the patient who should be enrolled. In our study, we evaluated the reasons for refusing to participate in a clinical trial. In the last 10 years of cardiovascular clinical research, we asked an informed consent to 2586 patients for intervention studies. Overall, 59% agreed to join clinical trials, 40% refused. The 1% initially accepted and then withdrew the consent. Those who refused were more frequently women, relatively younger (mean age 62 ± 5 vs 74 ± 9 years) and had a higher level of education and income. We asked all these patients who refused to answer a brief questionnaire about the reasons for rejection. Of 1031 patients, 629 (61%), accepted to answer the interview; 176 (28%) answered they refused on relatives', friends' or other doctors' advices, or after Internet searches; 157 (25%) answered they did not agree about how the trials were carried out (double-blind control procedure, use of placebo); 126 (20%) did not trust official medicine; 63 (10%) could not guarantee their presence at the follow-up visits; 69 (11%) did not want to undergo additional medical examinations; 31 (5%) had previous bad research experiences (feeling like a guinea pig); 7 (about 1%) refused for other reasons. Recruitment into clinical research studies is still a major challenge. Patients, due to a prevailing humanistic culture, are not fully aware of the importance of participation in clinical research, which is sometimes considered as exclusive economic or prestige interest. In our experience, people who refused participation in the trials were younger, with a high level of education and income, more frequently women. The researcher's task is to motivate the patient by emphasizing that participating in a study means being the actors of a treatment choice and that one is a guinea pig when taking untested therapies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The request for informed consent to join a clinical trial often creates mistrust and hesitation in the patient who should be enrolled. In our study, we evaluated the reasons for refusing to participate in a clinical trial.
METHODS METHODS
In the last 10 years of cardiovascular clinical research, we asked an informed consent to 2586 patients for intervention studies. Overall, 59% agreed to join clinical trials, 40% refused. The 1% initially accepted and then withdrew the consent. Those who refused were more frequently women, relatively younger (mean age 62 ± 5 vs 74 ± 9 years) and had a higher level of education and income. We asked all these patients who refused to answer a brief questionnaire about the reasons for rejection.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 1031 patients, 629 (61%), accepted to answer the interview; 176 (28%) answered they refused on relatives', friends' or other doctors' advices, or after Internet searches; 157 (25%) answered they did not agree about how the trials were carried out (double-blind control procedure, use of placebo); 126 (20%) did not trust official medicine; 63 (10%) could not guarantee their presence at the follow-up visits; 69 (11%) did not want to undergo additional medical examinations; 31 (5%) had previous bad research experiences (feeling like a guinea pig); 7 (about 1%) refused for other reasons.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Recruitment into clinical research studies is still a major challenge. Patients, due to a prevailing humanistic culture, are not fully aware of the importance of participation in clinical research, which is sometimes considered as exclusive economic or prestige interest. In our experience, people who refused participation in the trials were younger, with a high level of education and income, more frequently women. The researcher's task is to motivate the patient by emphasizing that participating in a study means being the actors of a treatment choice and that one is a guinea pig when taking untested therapies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32202565
doi: 10.1714/3328.32993
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

ita

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

309-314

Auteurs

Franco Cosmi (F)

Cardiologia Valdichiana, Ospedale di Cortona (AR).

Beatrice Mariottoni (B)

Cardiologia Valdichiana, Ospedale di Cortona (AR).

Barbara Tarquini (B)

Cardiologia Valdichiana, Ospedale di Cortona (AR).

Simona D'Orazio (S)

Cardiologia Valdichiana, Ospedale di Cortona (AR).

Moira Bennati (M)

Cardiologia Valdichiana, Ospedale di Cortona (AR).

Monia Morganti (M)

Cardiologia Valdichiana, Ospedale di Cortona (AR).

Deborah Cosmi (D)

Cardiologia, Ospedale Gubbio-Gualdo Tadino, Perugia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH