Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score.
Journal
JAMA internal medicine
ISSN: 2168-6114
Titre abrégé: JAMA Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589534
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2020
01 05 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
3
2020
medline:
21
1
2021
entrez:
24
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The management of patients with syncope in the emergency department (ED) is challenging because no robust risk tool available has been recommended for clinical use. To validate the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) in a new cohort of patients with syncope to determine its ability to predict 30-day serious outcomes not evident during index ED evaluation. This prospective multicenter cohort study conducted at 9 EDs across Canada included patients 16 years and older who presented to EDs within 24 hours of syncope. Patients were enrolled from March 2014 to April 2018. Baseline characteristics, CSRS predictors, and 30-day adjudicated serious outcomes, including arrhythmic (arrhythmias, interventions for arrhythmia, or unknown cause of death) and nonarrhythmic (myocardial infarction, structural heart disease, pulmonary embolism, or hemorrhage) serious outcomes, were collected. Calibration and discrimination characteristics for CSRS validation were calculated. A total of 3819 patients were included (mean [SD] age 53.9 [22.8] years; 2088 [54.7%] female), of whom 139 (3.6%) experienced 30-day serious outcomes, including 13 patients (0.3%) who died. In the validation cohort, there were no differences between the predicted and observed risk, the calibration slope was 1.0, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93). The empirical probability of a 30-day serious outcome during validation was 3.64% (95% CI, 3.09%-4.28%) compared with the model-predicted probability of 3.17% (95% CI, 2.66%-3.77%; P = .26). The proportion of patients with 30-day serious outcomes increased from 3 of 1631 (0.3%) in the very-low-risk group to 40 of 78 (51.3%) in the very-high-risk group (Cochran-Armitage trend test P < .001). There was a similar significant increase in the serious outcome subtypes with increasing CSRS risk category. None of the very-low-risk and low-risk patients died or experienced ventricular arrhythmia. At a threshold score of -1 (2145 of 3819 patients), the CSRS sensitivity and specificity were 97.8% (95% CI, 93.8%-99.6%) and 44.3% (95% CI, 42.7%-45.9%), respectively. The CSRS was successfully validated and its use is recommended to guide ED management of patients when serious causes are not identified during index ED evaluation. Very-low-risk and low-risk patients can generally be discharged, while brief hospitalization can be considered for high-risk patients. We believe CSRS implementation has the potential to improve patient safety and health care efficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32202605
pii: 2763181
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0288
pmc: PMC7091474
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
737-744Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 May;47(5):448-54
pubmed: 16631985
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):276-83
pubmed: 18206736
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7
pubmed: 18064739
CMAJ. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):E289-E298
pubmed: 27378464
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;52(2):151-9
pubmed: 18282636
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;19(6):694-702
pubmed: 22687184
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Dec;48(12):1503-10
pubmed: 8543964
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;25(4):388-396
pubmed: 29136314
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:114-121
pubmed: 30224031
Circulation. 2019 Feb 25;:
pubmed: 30798615
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Mar 1;95(5):668-71
pubmed: 15721118
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):713-21
pubmed: 20170806
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;64(6):649-55.e2
pubmed: 24882667
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):998-1001
pubmed: 25943042
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 23;336(4):243-50
pubmed: 8995086
Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1396-1406
pubmed: 30661373
J Neurol. 1991 Feb;238(1):39-43
pubmed: 2030371
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):1883-1948
pubmed: 29562304
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Feb;43(2):224-32
pubmed: 14747812
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Apr;33(4):437-47
pubmed: 10092723
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63
pubmed: 25560714
Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov;30(21):2631-71
pubmed: 19713422
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;70(5):620-663
pubmed: 28286222
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1029-34
pubmed: 15466144
Eur Heart J. 2003 May;24(9):811-9
pubmed: 12727148