Associations Between Screen Use and Child Language Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Journal
JAMA pediatrics
ISSN: 2168-6211
Titre abrégé: JAMA Pediatr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
3
2020
medline:
23
3
2021
entrez:
24
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is considerable public and scientific debate as to whether screen use helps or hinders early child development, particularly the development of language skills. To examine via meta-analyses the associations between quantity (duration of screen time and background television), quality (educational programming and co-viewing), and onset of screen use and children's language skills. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO in March 2019. The search strategy included a publication date limit from 1960 through March 2019. Inclusion criteria were a measure of screen use; a measure of language skills; and statistical data that could be transformed into an effect size. Exclusion criteria were qualitative studies; child age older than 12 years; and language assessment preverbal. The following variables were extracted: effect size, child age and sex, screen measure type, study publication year, and study design. All studies were independently coded by 2 coders and conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Based on a priori study criteria, quantity of screen use included duration of screen time and background television, quality of screen use included co-viewing and exposure to educational programs, and onset of screen use was defined as the age children first began viewing screens. The child language outcome included assessments of receptive and/or expressive language. Participants totaled 18 905 from 42 studies included. Effect sizes were measured as correlations (r). Greater quantity of screen use (hours per use) was associated with lower language skills (screen time [n = 38; r = -0.14; 95% CI, -0.18 to -0.10]; background television [n = 5; r = -0.19; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.05]), while better-quality screen use (educational programs [n = 13; r = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.24]; co-viewing [n = 12; r = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-.24]) were associated with stronger child language skills. Later age at screen use onset was also associated with stronger child language skills [n = 4; r = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.27]. The findings of this meta-analysis support pediatric recommendations to limit children's duration of screen exposure, to select high-quality programming, and to co-view when possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32202633
pii: 2762864
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327
pmc: PMC7091394
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
665-675Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Mar;49(3):193-8
pubmed: 23437778
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Oct;40(9):869-77
pubmed: 26112158
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:69-76
pubmed: 28212816
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 May;164(5):432-7
pubmed: 20194251
Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Nov;22(8):461-477
pubmed: 29601064
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013 Sep;52(9):857-65
pubmed: 23820003
Infant Behav Dev. 2015 Feb;38:20-6
pubmed: 25544743
Pediatrics. 2018 Oct;142(4):
pubmed: 30201624
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jun;41(6 Suppl 3):iii-iv
pubmed: 27306430
J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;181:74-79.e3
pubmed: 27745750
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 May;162(5):411-7
pubmed: 18458186
Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Apr;36(2):245-54
pubmed: 23454426
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;57(12):1434-1443
pubmed: 27605246
Br J Dev Psychol. 2012 Jun;30(Pt 2):326-43
pubmed: 22550951
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019 Feb/Mar;40(2):99-104
pubmed: 30753173
Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):342-9
pubmed: 19564318
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;40(1):75-82
pubmed: 11195567
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016 Oct;63(5):827-39
pubmed: 27565361
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jul;153(7):705-14
pubmed: 10401803
Child Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;72(5):1347-66
pubmed: 11700636
Pediatr Res. 2019 Oct;86(4):416-418
pubmed: 31195401
Lancet. 2004 Jul 17-23;364(9430):257-62
pubmed: 15262103
Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):993-1027
pubmed: 15535753
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(5):1-173; discussion 174-85
pubmed: 7845413
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5):
pubmed: 27940793
Psychol Bull. 1982 Jul;92(1):3-26
pubmed: 7134327
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Jul;159(7):619-25
pubmed: 15996993
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Dec;164(12):1105-11
pubmed: 21135338
Acta Paediatr. 2009 Jan;98(1):8-16
pubmed: 18793294
Pediatr Res. 2013 Sep;74(3):350-5
pubmed: 23788060
J Child Lang. 2002 Aug;29(3):519-43
pubmed: 12109362
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1559-73
pubmed: 12111920
Child Dev. 1999 Sep-Oct;70(5):1067-81
pubmed: 10546335
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0120663
pubmed: 25785449
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 17;8:1833
pubmed: 29089912
J Sleep Res. 2006 Jun;15(2):154-61
pubmed: 16704570
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Nov;165(11):979-86
pubmed: 21727260
BMC Pediatr. 2009 May 22;9:34
pubmed: 19460170
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 30;:
pubmed: 31566689
Acta Paediatr. 2008 Jul;97(7):977-82
pubmed: 18460044
Pediatrics. 2015 Jan;135(1):1-3
pubmed: 25548323
Child Dev. 2009 Sep-Oct;80(5):1360-75
pubmed: 19765005
J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Feb;28(2):401-410
pubmed: 31105418
Child Dev. 2019 Jan;90(1):e56-e65
pubmed: 29235663
J Pediatr. 2018 Nov;202:300-303
pubmed: 30139534
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 04;10(8):e0134251
pubmed: 26241892
J Pediatr. 2007 Oct;151(4):364-8
pubmed: 17889070
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):554-8
pubmed: 19487612
Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4):
pubmed: 31551396
Acta Paediatr. 2019 May;108(5):903-910
pubmed: 30372561
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):956-970
pubmed: 24112079
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jul;20(7):672-677
pubmed: 28169149
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Mar 1;173(3):244-250
pubmed: 30688984
Pediatrics. 2009 Mar;123(3):e370-5
pubmed: 19254972
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 2;115(40):9851-9858
pubmed: 30275319