The effects of resistance training experience on movement characteristics in the bench press exercise.
Bench press
Resistance training
Tempo
Journal
Biology of sport
ISSN: 0860-021X
Titre abrégé: Biol Sport
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 8700872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
27
10
2019
revised:
12
11
2019
accepted:
18
12
2019
entrez:
25
3
2020
pubmed:
25
3
2020
medline:
25
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The main aim of this study was to determine whether the level of experience in strength training has a significant effect on differences in the value of exercise volume determined on time under tension (TUT) and number of repetition (REP) for a specific movement tempo. The study examined 68 men divided into groups of beginners and advanced strength trained athletes. The participants performed 5 sets of bench press (BP) at 70% 1RM using either a REG, MED or SLOW metronome guided cadence. Each set was performed to failure and with 3 min of rest between sets. Significant differences in TUT were found between the groups of beginners and advanced athletes for the slow (SLO) 6/0/4/0 tempo in set 1 (p = 0.01) and set 2 (p = 0.04), and for the regular (REG) 2/0/2/0 tempo in set 5 (p = 0.01). Significant differences were documented for total TUT between the beginners and advanced athletes for the SLO 6/0/4/0 tempo (p = 0.04). The results of ANOVA revealed significant differences in the number of repetitions between groups for the SLO 6/0/4/0 tempo in set 4 (p = 0.04) and set 5 (p = 0.04), and for the REG 2/0/2/0 tempo in set 5 (p = 0.01). The main finding of this study is that strength training experience has a significant effect on training volume, both in terms of TUT and REP at a specific constant movement tempo. Significant differences do not occur for each value of the tempo used.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32205913
doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2019.83008
pii: 83008
pmc: PMC7075231
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
79-83Informations de copyright
Copyright © Biology of Sport 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.
Références
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):110-9
pubmed: 9699161
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Feb;25(2):406-13
pubmed: 20351575
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Nov;88(1-2):50-60
pubmed: 12436270
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Aug;15(3):309-14
pubmed: 11710656
Sports Med. 2004;34(10):663-79
pubmed: 15335243
J Neurol Sci. 2008 Mar 15;266(1-2):51-6
pubmed: 17916367
Sports Med. 2005;35(10):841-51
pubmed: 16180944
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Mar;76(3):1247-55
pubmed: 8005869
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Nov;31(11):3010-3017
pubmed: 29065077
Biol Sport. 2019 Mar;36(1):31-37
pubmed: 30899137
J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Aug;20(3):523-7
pubmed: 16937964
Biol Sport. 2019 Dec;36(4):351-356
pubmed: 31938006
J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Nov;20(4):760-6
pubmed: 17194227
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001 Jun;41(2):154-8
pubmed: 11447355
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Aug;16(3):373-82
pubmed: 12173951
J Hum Kinet. 2018 Jun 13;62:241-250
pubmed: 29922395
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2018 Mar;39(1):26-32
pubmed: 29803204
Can J Appl Physiol. 1997 Aug;22(4):307-27
pubmed: 9263616
J Physiol. 2010 Aug 15;588(Pt 16):3119-30
pubmed: 20581041